Re: [RFC v2] ARM VM System Specification

[Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>]

Start with Linaro publishing it. It can always be moved to another
venue if someone dislikes Linaro having maintainership.

g.


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Michael Casadevall
<michael.casadevall@linaro.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 04/01/2014 05:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:26 -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> However, that may be a pain to update
>>
>> Very much, and there would be nothing worse than having multiple
>> divergent copies of the spec.
>>
>>> so the preferred method could be to host it in either its current
>>> form (clear-text) or publish some versioned PDF somewhere and
>>> simply point to it from the compliant software pieces.
>>
>> I think that would be best.
>>
>> I'm at a loss to suggest a suitable neutral home though I'm
>> afraid.
>>
>
> I agree with formal PDF (or TeX/plain text) releases + versioning;
> something I can print out and hit people with always works great for
> spec compliance.
>
> On the topic of hosting, if Linaro itself isn't neutral enough, what
> about under the Linux Foundation? They already host a bunch of
> standards like the FHS.
> Michael
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTOo2JAAoJEGKVRgSEnX1Qu+gH/ja+aqOqc04gbpFvuarHtzeM
> nLtJ1ie4JKOJTVqqQz+lgPhx+r3H9PrMFZnGvzs8H6GYSaU66i/SHKU150J1Ig5M
> 1w4DYqQj7DEClpoNmpPZVJJbevp70/wDH1wFSJZXJmxV9yOpMtrNZXwB60KANP2f
> MJDF+iDLIkv8vRPYQJEmuV4PMcJQs88X91eEb67jChX1ntMiiDAFSM6t2cRyfVG0
> la4Ujk/p/u+Kr43wbhQITOKXZpWCtI8gjp7wTuZc+EDIhmufd5uiQ2VyTZaMkPkV
> xuX9871Y8VHGxCkAmhHPODbp3Wd4VUP2ewOYnTRYR2IIRpa4gNNLUa+MSdrL/sU=
> =2ub7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----