[PATCH 1/2] regulator: rk808: Remove unused variables

[PATCH 1/2] regulator: rk808: Remove unused variables

[Axel Lin]

Also remove non-informative comment.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 26 --------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
index d91f2b6..9557428 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
@@ -28,32 +28,6 @@
 #define RK808_BUCK4_VSEL_MASK	0xf
 #define RK808_LDO_VSEL_MASK	0x1f
 
-static const int buck_set_vol_base_addr[] = {
-	RK808_BUCK1_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK2_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK3_CONFIG_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK4_ON_VSEL_REG,
-};
-
-static const int buck_contr_base_addr[] = {
-	RK808_BUCK1_CONFIG_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK2_CONFIG_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK3_CONFIG_REG,
-	RK808_BUCK4_CONFIG_REG,
-};
-
-static const int ldo_set_vol_base_addr[] = {
-	RK808_LDO1_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO2_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO3_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO4_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO5_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO6_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO7_ON_VSEL_REG,
-	RK808_LDO8_ON_VSEL_REG,
-};
-
-/* rk808 voltage number */
 static const struct regulator_linear_range rk808_buck_voltage_ranges[] = {
 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(700000, 0, 63, 12500),
 };
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH 2/2] regulator: rk808: Fix missing of_node_put

[Axel Lin]

1. Pass &pdev->dev rather than &client->dev to of_regulator_match, the *dev
   argument is used for devres to ensure devm_of_regulator_put_matches() will
   be called when unload the module.

2. of_get_child_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount incremented.
   Thus add missing of_node_put(reg_np).

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
index 9557428..07b0eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
@@ -281,8 +281,9 @@ static int rk808_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!reg_np)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	ret = of_regulator_match(&client->dev, reg_np, rk808_reg_matches,
+	ret = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, reg_np, rk808_reg_matches,
 				 RK808_NUM_REGULATORS);
+	of_node_put(reg_np);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: rk808: Fix missing of_node_put

[Doug Anderson]

Axel,

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote:
> 1. Pass &pdev->dev rather than &client->dev to of_regulator_match, the *dev
>    argument is used for devres to ensure devm_of_regulator_put_matches() will
>    be called when unload the module.
>
> 2. of_get_child_by_name() returns a node pointer with refcount incremented.
>    Thus add missing of_node_put(reg_np).
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I've tested that things still work fine after applying this patch and
confirmed both of your statements are true to the best of my
knowledge.  I haven't tested module removal (which is where some of
this matters) but what's here looks good.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

-Doug

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: rk808: Remove unused variables

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 120 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:21:10PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Also remove non-informative comment.

Applied both, thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: rk808: Remove unused variables

[Doug Anderson]

Axel,

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> wrote:
> Also remove non-informative comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 26 --------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)

Seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>