[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: make run results better visible

[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: make run results better visible

[Vadim Bendebury]

For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.

Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.

Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
observed error messages in the script output.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
---

 tools/patman/patman.py | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
index c60aa5a..0163ccd 100755
--- a/tools/patman/patman.py
+++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
@@ -154,13 +154,19 @@ else:
 
     # Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel)
     cmd = ''
-    if ok or options.ignore_errors:
+    its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
+    if its_a_go:
         cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args,
                 options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file,
                 in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
+    else:
+        print col.Color(col.RED,
+                        "Not sending emails due to checkpatch errors/warnings")
 
     # For a dry run, just show our actions as a sanity check
     if options.dry_run:
         series.ShowActions(args, cmd, options.process_tags)
+        if not its_a_go:
+            print col.Color(col.RED, "Email would not be sent")
 
     os.remove(cc_file)
-- 
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5

[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: make run results better visible

[Doug Anderson]

Vadim,

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> wrote:
> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
> that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
> shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
>
> Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
>
> Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
> observed error messages in the script output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
> ---
>
>  tools/patman/patman.py | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
> index c60aa5a..0163ccd 100755
> --- a/tools/patman/patman.py
> +++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
> @@ -154,13 +154,19 @@ else:
>
>      # Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel)
>      cmd = ''
> -    if ok or options.ignore_errors:
> +    its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
> +    if its_a_go:
>          cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args,
>                  options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file,
>                  in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
> +    else:
> +        print col.Color(col.RED,
> +                        "Not sending emails due to checkpatch errors/warnings")

Technically it could be due to other problems, too (like errors applying).


>      # For a dry run, just show our actions as a sanity check
>      if options.dry_run:
>          series.ShowActions(args, cmd, options.process_tags)
> +        if not its_a_go:
> +            print col.Color(col.RED, "Email would not be sent")
>
>      os.remove(cc_file)

Looks good to me, other than that.

-Doug

[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: make run results better visible

[Vadim Bendebury]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> Vadim,
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> wrote:
>> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
>> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
>> that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
>> shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
>>
>> Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
>>
>> Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
>> observed error messages in the script output.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>>  tools/patman/patman.py | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
>> index c60aa5a..0163ccd 100755
>> --- a/tools/patman/patman.py
>> +++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
>> @@ -154,13 +154,19 @@ else:
>>
>>      # Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel)
>>      cmd = ''
>> -    if ok or options.ignore_errors:
>> +    its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
>> +    if its_a_go:
>>          cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args,
>>                  options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file,
>>                  in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
>> +    else:
>> +        print col.Color(col.RED,
>> +                        "Not sending emails due to checkpatch errors/warnings")
>
> Technically it could be due to other problems, too (like errors applying).

good point, what wording would you suggest?

--vb

>
>
>>      # For a dry run, just show our actions as a sanity check
>>      if options.dry_run:
>>          series.ShowActions(args, cmd, options.process_tags)
>> +        if not its_a_go:
>> +            print col.Color(col.RED, "Email would not be sent")
>>
>>      os.remove(cc_file)
>
> Looks good to me, other than that.
>
> -Doug

[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: make run results better visible

[Doug Anderson]

Vadim,

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Vadim,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
>>> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
>>> that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
>>> shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
>>>
>>> Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
>>>
>>> Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
>>> observed error messages in the script output.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  tools/patman/patman.py | 8 +++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
>>> index c60aa5a..0163ccd 100755
>>> --- a/tools/patman/patman.py
>>> +++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
>>> @@ -154,13 +154,19 @@ else:
>>>
>>>      # Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel)
>>>      cmd = ''
>>> -    if ok or options.ignore_errors:
>>> +    its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
>>> +    if its_a_go:
>>>          cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args,
>>>                  options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file,
>>>                  in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
>>> +    else:
>>> +        print col.Color(col.RED,
>>> +                        "Not sending emails due to checkpatch errors/warnings")
>>
>> Technically it could be due to other problems, too (like errors applying).
>
> good point, what wording would you suggest?

You don't think that just removing the word "checkpatch" is enough.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] patman: make run results better visible

[Vadim Bendebury]

For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.

Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.

Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
observed error messages in the script output.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
  - modified the error message for accuracy

 tools/patman/patman.py | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
index c60aa5a..86e8e63 100755
--- a/tools/patman/patman.py
+++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
@@ -154,13 +154,18 @@ else:
 
     # Email the patches out (giving the user time to check / cancel)
     cmd = ''
-    if ok or options.ignore_errors:
+    its_a_go = ok or options.ignore_errors
+    if its_a_go:
         cmd = gitutil.EmailPatches(series, cover_fname, args,
                 options.dry_run, not options.ignore_bad_tags, cc_file,
                 in_reply_to=options.in_reply_to)
+    else:
+        print col.Color(col.RED, "Not sending emails due to errors/warnings")
 
     # For a dry run, just show our actions as a sanity check
     if options.dry_run:
         series.ShowActions(args, cmd, options.process_tags)
+        if not its_a_go:
+            print col.Color(col.RED, "Email would not be sent")
 
     os.remove(cc_file)
-- 
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] patman: make run results better visible

[Doug Anderson]

Vadim,

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> wrote:
> For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
> instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
> that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
> shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
>
> Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
>
> Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
> observed error messages in the script output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
>   - modified the error message for accuracy
>
>  tools/patman/patman.py | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] patman: make run results better visible

[Simon Glass]

On 4 September 2014 12:57, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:

> Vadim,
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > For an occasional user of patman some failures are not obvious: for
> > instance when checkpatch reports warnings, the dry run still reports
> > that the email would be sent. If it is not dry run, the warnings are
> > shown on the screen, but it is not clear that the email was not sent.
> >
> > Add some code to report failure to send email explicitly.
> >
> > Tested by running the script on a patch with style violations,
> > observed error messages in the script output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - modified the error message for accuracy
> >
> >  tools/patman/patman.py | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>

Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] patman: make run results better visible

[Simon Glass]

Applied to u-boot-x86/buildman, thanks!