Is Hammer end of life now?

Is Hammer end of life now?

[Ken Dreyer]

http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/ says Hammer's estimated
retirement is "November 2016"

Is Hammer EOL now? Should I put "December 2016" for actual retirement?

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Nathan Cutler]

> Is Hammer EOL now? Should I put "December 2016" for actual retirement?

We are preparing a 0.94.10 point release, which will possibly be the 
last. If the retirement month is the month in which the last point 
release is published, you could put December 2016 or January 2017.

People keep earmarking issues for hammer backport, so I am getting ready 
to do another round of PR testing/merging, after which I will ask 
Abhishek if a 0.94.10 should be published.

Does anyone have anything in particular they would like to see in 0.94.10?

-- 
Nathan Cutler
Software Engineer Distributed Storage
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Tel.: +420 284 084 037

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub]

Need to have 18187 and 17985 backported.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
>> Is Hammer EOL now? Should I put "December 2016" for actual retirement?
>
>
> We are preparing a 0.94.10 point release, which will possibly be the last.
> If the retirement month is the month in which the last point release is
> published, you could put December 2016 or January 2017.
>
> People keep earmarking issues for hammer backport, so I am getting ready to
> do another round of PR testing/merging, after which I will ask Abhishek if a
> 0.94.10 should be published.
>
> Does anyone have anything in particular they would like to see in 0.94.10?
>
> --
> Nathan Cutler
> Software Engineer Distributed Storage
> SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
> Tel.: +420 284 084 037
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Yehuda:

> Need to have 18187 and 17985 backported.

Both of those are already staged. I will schedule another round of tests 
today.

I see you marked http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16122 for backport to 
hammer. I gave it a try, but it is beyond my capabilities. Depending on 
if this backport is a "must-have" or a "nice-to-have", either someone 
other than me would have to do it or we could just omit it.

Thanks,
Nathan

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Mykola Golub]

Hi, Nathan,

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:31:58AM +0100, Nathan Cutler wrote:

> Both of those are already staged. I will schedule another round of tests 
> today.

If it is not too late, could you please include this PR to your test
branch:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12446

I am going to test this myself too, still the more tests the better :-)

-- 
Mykola Golub

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Mykola:

> If it is not too late, could you please include this PR to your test
> branch:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12446

That one is included in the integration branch wip-hammer-backports - 
see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-28

> I am going to test this myself too, still the more tests the better :-)

I am unable to convince Shaman to build my hammer-based testing branch, 
maybe you'll have better luck?

In my case, the build log says:

configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating scripts/gtest-config
config.status: creating build-aux/config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing libtool commands
+ mkdir -p release
+ releasedir=release
+ versionfile=release/version
+ git diff --quiet
+ echo

+ echo '**** REPOSITORY IS DIRTY ****'
**** REPOSITORY IS DIRTY ****

Also, I'm confused about where to push the testing branch. For now I'm 
pushing to both ceph/ceph-ci and ceph/ceph.

-- 
Nathan Cutler
Software Engineer Distributed Storage
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Tel.: +420 284 084 037

Re: Is Hammer end of life now?

[Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Yehuda:
>
>> Need to have 18187 and 17985 backported.
>
>
> Both of those are already staged. I will schedule another round of tests
> today.
>
> I see you marked http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16122 for backport to
> hammer. I gave it a try, but it is beyond my capabilities. Depending on if
> this backport is a "must-have" or a "nice-to-have", either someone other
> than me would have to do it or we could just omit it.
>

We'd still want to see it in, so maybe someone else can pick it up.

Thanks,
Yehuda