From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org> To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Christoffer Dall <Christoffer.Dall@arm.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: kvm: Inject events at the last stage of sync Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:41:10 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CADSWDzuQvZThaoFbeYM2QrDbwRPrZuiyDrVJV=jxiSMTW9O-rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200204103447.naw26xl2y2zbyrqb@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 10:34, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:24:40PM +0000, Beata Michalska wrote: > > KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS might actually lead to vcpu registers being modified. > > As such this should be the last step of sync to avoid potential overwriting > > of whatever changes KVM might have done. > > > > Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org> > > --- > > target/arm/kvm32.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > > target/arm/kvm64.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c > > index 32bf8d6..cf2b47f 100644 > > --- a/target/arm/kvm32.c > > +++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c > > @@ -386,17 +386,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); > > > > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { > > return EINVAL; > > } > > > > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > I think we should put a comment above this that says basically the same > thing as the commit message in order to explain why kvm_put_vcpu_events() > *must* be after write_list_to_kvmstate(). > Will do that. > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); > > > > return ret; > > @@ -462,11 +462,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > } > > vfp_set_fpscr(env, fpscr); > > > > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { > > return EINVAL; > > } > > @@ -475,6 +470,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > */ > > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu); > > > > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > Why are we moving kvm_get_vcpu_events()? This is only to make things consistent with put_registeres. There is no functional change per se. BR Beata > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu); > > > > return 0; > > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c > > index 6344113..d06fd32 100644 > > --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c > > +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c > > @@ -1043,17 +1043,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); > > > > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); > > > > return ret; > > @@ -1251,11 +1251,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > } > > vfp_set_fpcr(env, fpr); > > > > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > @@ -1264,6 +1259,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > */ > > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu); > > > > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu); > > > > /* TODO: other registers */ > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > Same comments for kvm64.c as for kvm32.c > > Thanks, > drew >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org> To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: kvm: Inject events at the last stage of sync Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:41:10 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CADSWDzuQvZThaoFbeYM2QrDbwRPrZuiyDrVJV=jxiSMTW9O-rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200204103447.naw26xl2y2zbyrqb@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 10:34, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:24:40PM +0000, Beata Michalska wrote: > > KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS might actually lead to vcpu registers being modified. > > As such this should be the last step of sync to avoid potential overwriting > > of whatever changes KVM might have done. > > > > Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org> > > --- > > target/arm/kvm32.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > > target/arm/kvm64.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c > > index 32bf8d6..cf2b47f 100644 > > --- a/target/arm/kvm32.c > > +++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c > > @@ -386,17 +386,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); > > > > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { > > return EINVAL; > > } > > > > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > I think we should put a comment above this that says basically the same > thing as the commit message in order to explain why kvm_put_vcpu_events() > *must* be after write_list_to_kvmstate(). > Will do that. > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); > > > > return ret; > > @@ -462,11 +462,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > } > > vfp_set_fpscr(env, fpscr); > > > > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { > > return EINVAL; > > } > > @@ -475,6 +470,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > */ > > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu); > > > > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > Why are we moving kvm_get_vcpu_events()? This is only to make things consistent with put_registeres. There is no functional change per se. BR Beata > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu); > > > > return 0; > > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c > > index 6344113..d06fd32 100644 > > --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c > > +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c > > @@ -1043,17 +1043,17 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) > > return ret; > > } > > > > - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); > > > > if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); > > > > return ret; > > @@ -1251,11 +1251,6 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > } > > vfp_set_fpcr(env, fpr); > > > > - ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > - if (ret) { > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > @@ -1264,6 +1259,11 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) > > */ > > write_list_to_cpustate(cpu); > > > > + ret = kvm_get_vcpu_events(cpu); > > + if (ret) { > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_qemu(cpu); > > > > /* TODO: other registers */ > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > Same comments for kvm64.c as for kvm32.c > > Thanks, > drew > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 22:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-01-29 20:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] target/arm: kvm: Support for KVM DABT without valid ISS Beata Michalska 2020-01-29 20:24 ` Beata Michalska 2020-01-29 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] target/arm: kvm: Inject events at the last stage of sync Beata Michalska 2020-01-29 20:24 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-04 10:34 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-04 10:34 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-06 21:41 ` Beata Michalska [this message] 2020-02-06 21:41 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-07 7:41 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-07 7:41 ` Andrew Jones 2020-01-29 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/arm: kvm: Handle DABT with no valid ISS Beata Michalska 2020-01-29 20:24 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-05 16:57 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-05 16:57 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-06 21:48 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-06 21:48 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-07 8:19 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-07 8:19 ` Andrew Jones 2020-02-11 23:10 ` Beata Michalska 2020-02-11 23:10 ` Beata Michalska
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CADSWDzuQvZThaoFbeYM2QrDbwRPrZuiyDrVJV=jxiSMTW9O-rg@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=beata.michalska@linaro.org \ --cc=Christoffer.Dall@arm.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \ --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.