Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Karin Hedlund]

>From an embedded device, I'm trying to mount a samba share using SMB2, with the 'vers=2.1' mount option, but I don't seem to get it to work, so I was hoping somebody could maybe shed some light.

mount -t cifs //192.168.0.1/networkshare /tmp/nas -o username=,password=,vers=2.1,nounix,noserverino,uid=123,gid=123,nobrl,file_mode=0770,dir_mode=0770,iocharset=utf8
mount: mounting //192.168.0.1/networkshare on /tmp/nas failed: Invalid argument

Client: Embedded device with Linux 3.14 kernel, BusyBox version v1.20.2p3
I have enabled and built the embedded device's kernel with CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2.
/proc/fs/cifs/DebugData:
CIFS Version 2.02
Features:
Active VFS Requests: 0
Servers:

dmesg:
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //192.168.0.1/networkshare flags: 32768
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Anonymous login
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1f8  dir mode: 0x1f8
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\192.168.0.1\networkshare
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x2bc
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 3 with uid: 0
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
<7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3359
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc = -22
<7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 2) rc = -22

Server: Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy
I do have the max protocol = SMB2 under my [global] section in my samba.conf, and have restarted samba.

I've also tried to look at the communication over wireshark, and I do see several SMB Negotiate Protocol requests and responses, but in all of the requests there's just "Requested Dialects: Dialect: NT LM 0.12, and in all the responses same thing, Dialect Index:0 NT LM 0.12 - which, as far as I know corresponds to SMB version 1 (?), not the 2.1 version I was hoping for...

I'm lost here. I thought this was all one needed to do. So, any thoughts, insights or ideas would make me very happy. Thanks you guys!

Kind regards,
Karin

Re: Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Shirish Pargaonkar]

Is it possible to attach wireshark trace here?

Regards,

Shirish

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From an embedded device, I'm trying to mount a samba share using SMB2, with the 'vers=2.1' mount option, but I don't seem to get it to work, so I was hoping somebody could maybe shed some light.
>
> mount -t cifs //192.168.0.1/networkshare /tmp/nas -o username=,password=,vers=2.1,nounix,noserverino,uid=123,gid=123,nobrl,file_mode=0770,dir_mode=0770,iocharset=utf8
> mount: mounting //192.168.0.1/networkshare on /tmp/nas failed: Invalid argument
>
> Client: Embedded device with Linux 3.14 kernel, BusyBox version v1.20.2p3
> I have enabled and built the embedded device's kernel with CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2.
> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData:
> CIFS Version 2.02
> Features:
> Active VFS Requests: 0
> Servers:
>
> dmesg:
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //192.168.0.1/networkshare flags: 32768
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Anonymous login
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1f8  dir mode: 0x1f8
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\192.168.0.1\networkshare
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x2bc
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 3 with uid: 0
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102
> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3359
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length: 0x49
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code -1073741811 to POSIX err -22
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc = -22
> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 2) rc = -22
>
> Server: Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy
> I do have the max protocol = SMB2 under my [global] section in my samba.conf, and have restarted samba.
>
> I've also tried to look at the communication over wireshark, and I do see several SMB Negotiate Protocol requests and responses, but in all of the requests there's just "Requested Dialects: Dialect: NT LM 0.12, and in all the responses same thing, Dialect Index:0 NT LM 0.12 - which, as far as I know corresponds to SMB version 1 (?), not the 2.1 version I was hoping for...
>
> I'm lost here. I thought this was all one needed to do. So, any thoughts, insights or ideas would make me very happy. Thanks you guys!
>
> Kind regards,
> Karin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Shirish Pargaonkar]

vers=2.0 does not work?

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> What I said about wireshark was all wrong! So sorry, my bad!
> (I had another device connected also, and it was that device's SMB protocol negotiation I saw now that I look at it again).
>
> For this specific problem and device I get only one request and one response, and yes, it's indeed SMB protocol version 2 they're trying to negotiate. But I get
> NegotiateProcotol Response, Error: STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>Is it possible to attach wireshark trace here?
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Shirish
>
> No, unfortunately I can't post the wireshark trace. Sorry about that. I've attached wireshark screenshots for the SMB request and response packets though, hopefully it's better than nothing.
>
>>>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> From an embedded device, I'm trying to mount a samba share using SMB2, with the 'vers=2.1' mount option, but I don't seem to get it to work, so I was hoping somebody could maybe shed some light.
>>>
>>> mount -t cifs //192.168.0.1/networkshare /tmp/nas -o
>>> username=,password=,vers=2.1,nounix,noserverino,uid=123,gid=123,nobrl,
>>> file_mode=0770,dir_mode=0770,iocharset=utf8
>>> mount: mounting //192.168.0.1/networkshare on /tmp/nas failed: Invalid
>>> argument
>>>
>>>Client: Embedded device with Linux 3.14 kernel, BusyBox version
>>> v1.20.2p3 I have enabled and built the embedded device's kernel with CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2.
>>> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData:
>>> CIFS Version 2.02
>>> Features:
>>> Active VFS Requests: 0
>>> Servers:
>>>
>>> dmesg:
>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname:
>>> //192.168.0.1/networkshare flags: 32768 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: Anonymous login <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1f8  dir mode: 0x1f8 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0 <7>[
>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\192.168.0.1\networkshare <7>[
>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x2bc <7>[
>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid:
>>> 3 with uid: 0 <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess
>>> not found <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol <7>[
>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 <7>[
>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3359 <7>[
>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 <7>[ 3937.480000]
>>> fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length:
>>> 0x49 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 0
>>> <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 <7>[ 3937.480000]
>>> fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 <7>[
>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code
>>> -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null
>>> buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release <7>[ 3937.480000]
>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc =
>>> -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount
>>> (xid = 2) rc = -22
>>>
>>> Server: Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy
>>> I do have the max protocol = SMB2 under my [global] section in my samba.conf, and have restarted samba.
>>>
>>> I've also tried to look at the communication over wireshark, and I do see several SMB Negotiate Protocol requests and responses, but in all of the requests there's just "Requested Dialects: Dialect: NT LM 0.12, and in all the responses same thing, Dialect Index:0 NT LM 0.12 - which, as far as I know corresponds to SMB version 1 (?), not the 2.1 version I was hoping for...
>>>
>>> I'm lost here. I thought this was all one needed to do. So, any thoughts, insights or ideas would make me very happy. Thanks you guys!
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Karin

RE: Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Karin Hedlund]

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>vers=2.0 does not work?

Well, actually vers=2.0 does work fine! Thanks for the suggestion! :) I did try it earlier, but probably did not have all the other things in place by then, because I know it didn't work then, but it does now.
I wonder why nothing above vers=2.0 works though, any ideas?

>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund@axis.com> wrote:
>> What I said about wireshark was all wrong! So sorry, my bad!
>>(I had another device connected also, and it was that device's SMB protocol negotiation I saw now that I look at it again).
>>
>>For this specific problem and device I get only one request and one 
>> response, and yes, it's indeed SMB protocol version 2 they're trying to negotiate. But I get NegotiateProcotol Response, Error: STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Is it possible to attach wireshark trace here?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Shirish
>>
>> No, unfortunately I can't post the wireshark trace. Sorry about that. I've attached wireshark screenshots for the SMB request and response packets though, hopefully it's better than nothing.
>>
>>>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund@axis.com> wrote:
>>>> From an embedded device, I'm trying to mount a samba share using SMB2, with the 'vers=2.1' mount option, but I don't seem to get it to work, so I was hoping somebody could maybe shed some light.
>>>>
>>>> mount -t cifs //192.168.0.1/networkshare /tmp/nas -o 
>>>> username=,password=,vers=2.1,nounix,noserverino,uid=123,gid=123,nobr
>>>> l,
>>>> file_mode=0770,dir_mode=0770,iocharset=utf8
>>>> mount: mounting //192.168.0.1/networkshare on /tmp/nas failed: 
>>>> Invalid argument
>>>>
>>>>Client: Embedded device with Linux 3.14 kernel, BusyBox version
>>>> v1.20.2p3 I have enabled and built the embedded device's kernel with CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2.
>>>> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData:
>>>> CIFS Version 2.02
>>>> Features:
>>>> Active VFS Requests: 0
>>>> Servers:
>>>>
>>>> dmesg:
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname:
>>>> //192.168.0.1/networkshare flags: 32768 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: Anonymous login <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1f8  dir mode: 0x1f8 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0 
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\192.168.0.1\networkshare 
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x2bc <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid:
>>>> 3 with uid: 0 <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess 
>>>> not found <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol 
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3359 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length:
>>>> 0x49 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset 
>>>> 0 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 <7>[ 
>>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code
>>>> -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null 
>>>> buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release <7>[ 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc =
>>>> -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving 
>>>> cifs_mount (xid = 2) rc = -22
>>>>
>>>> Server: Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy I do have the max protocol = 
>>>> SMB2 under my [global] section in my samba.conf, and have restarted samba.
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried to look at the communication over wireshark, and I do see several SMB Negotiate Protocol requests and responses, but in all of the requests there's just "Requested Dialects: Dialect: NT LM 0.12, and in all the responses same thing, Dialect Index:0 NT LM 0.12 - which, as far as I know corresponds to SMB version 1 (?), not the 2.1 version I was hoping for...
>>>>
>>>> I'm lost here. I thought this was all one needed to do. So, any thoughts, insights or ideas would make me very happy. Thanks you guys!
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Karin

RE: Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Karin Hedlund]

On Jun 10, 2014 12:45, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On Jun 10, 2014 3:19 AM, "Karin Hedlund" <karin.hedlund@axis.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> vers=2.0 does not work?
>
>> Well, actually vers=2.0 does work fine! Thanks for the suggestion! :) I did try it earlier, but probably did not have all the other things in place by then, because I know it didn't work then, but it does now.
>> I wonder why nothing above vers=2.0 works though, any ideas?
>
>The obvious reason would be samba 3.6 on the server instead of samba 4 or later

Ah, ok, I see. I thought the client and server would sort of 'autonegotiate' and agree on the highest version they both support, but I guess that's not the case when using the 'vers' mount.cifs option then? In that case what I'm seeing is very much expected, so I'm very happy now. Thanks for all the support!

Any news on the upgrade of the default SMB version of the in-kernel cifs module, by the way?
 I found the SDC2013 "SMB3.02 And Linux: A Status Update" presentation (http://www.snia.org/sites/default/files2/SDC2013/presentations/Revisions/StevenFrench_SMB3_Meets_Linux_ver3_revision.pdf), but since it's almost already old by now and I'm curious, I thought I'd ask. :)

Re: Mount cifs using SMB2 - Invalid argument

[Steve French]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2014 12:45, Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>>On Jun 10, 2014 3:19 AM, "Karin Hedlund" <karin.hedlund-VrBV9hrLPhE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> vers=2.0 does not work?
>>
>>> Well, actually vers=2.0 does work fine! Thanks for the suggestion! :) I did try it earlier, but probably did not have all the other things in place by then, because I know it didn't work then, but it does now.
>>> I wonder why nothing above vers=2.0 works though, any ideas?
>>
>>The obvious reason would be samba 3.6 on the server instead of samba 4 or later
>
> Ah, ok, I see. I thought the client and server would sort of 'autonegotiate' and agree on the highest version they both support, but I guess that's not the case when using the 'vers' mount.cifs option then? In that case what I'm seeing is very much expected, so I'm very happy now. Thanks for all the support!

We don't autonegotiate smb2 vs. smb2.1 vs. smb3 vs. smb3.02 (yet) -
specify specific dialect on mount.  Not clear if this should be
handled in user space or kernel either (if at all).    On the other
hand, looks like the server does not support smb3 (thus my guess that
you are running an SMB3.6 based, rather than Samba 4.x based filer).

> Any news on the upgrade of the default SMB version of the in-kernel cifs module, by the way?

1) MultiCredit support (faster large file copy) needs to be added
(Pavel is looking at this)

2) Unix extensions (I have a prototype small patch which requests such
support on open, but no server support yet)

>  I found the SDC2013 "SMB3.02 And Linux: A Status Update" presentation (http://www.snia.org/sites/default/files2/SDC2013/presentations/Revisions/StevenFrench_SMB3_Meets_Linux_ver3_revision.pdf), but since it's almost already old by now and I'm curious, I thought I'd ask. :)



-- 
Thanks,

Steve