* [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.
@ 2022-04-13 15:26 Gavin Wan
2022-04-14 14:24 ` Alex Deucher
2022-04-14 17:58 ` Paul Menzel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Wan @ 2022-04-13 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amd-gfx; +Cc: Gavin Wan
[why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.
When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and
multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch
registers address are changed each other. Then it caused
reading/writing to wrong GPU.
[fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
in stack.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan <Gavin.Wan@amd.com>
Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
@@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
uint32_t timeout = 50000;
uint32_t i, tmp;
uint32_t ret = 0;
- static void *scratch_reg0;
- static void *scratch_reg1;
- static void *scratch_reg2;
- static void *scratch_reg3;
- static void *spare_int;
+ void *scratch_reg0;
+ void *scratch_reg1;
+ void *scratch_reg2;
+ void *scratch_reg3;
+ void *spare_int;
if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
dev_err(adev->dev,
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.
2022-04-13 15:26 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW Gavin Wan
@ 2022-04-14 14:24 ` Alex Deucher
2022-04-14 17:58 ` Paul Menzel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2022-04-14 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin Wan; +Cc: amd-gfx list
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:27 AM Gavin Wan <Gavin.Wan@amd.com> wrote:
>
> [why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.
> When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and
> multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch
> registers address are changed each other. Then it caused
> reading/writing to wrong GPU.
>
> [fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
> in stack.
Please add:
Fixes: 5d447e29670148 ("drm/amdgpu: add helper for rlcg indirect reg access")
With that added.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan <Gavin.Wan@amd.com>
> Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
> uint32_t timeout = 50000;
> uint32_t i, tmp;
> uint32_t ret = 0;
> - static void *scratch_reg0;
> - static void *scratch_reg1;
> - static void *scratch_reg2;
> - static void *scratch_reg3;
> - static void *spare_int;
> + void *scratch_reg0;
> + void *scratch_reg1;
> + void *scratch_reg2;
> + void *scratch_reg3;
> + void *spare_int;
>
> if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
> dev_err(adev->dev,
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.
2022-04-13 15:26 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW Gavin Wan
2022-04-14 14:24 ` Alex Deucher
@ 2022-04-14 17:58 ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-14 18:34 ` Wan, Gavin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2022-04-14 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin Wan; +Cc: amd-gfx
Dear Gavin,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 13.04.22 um 17:26 schrieb Gavin Wan:
Should you re-roll your patch (v2), please remove the dot/period from
the end of the git commit message summary (subject).
> [why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.
s/saves/save/
> When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and
s/installed/install/
> multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch
… same time, the RLC …
> registers address are changed each other. Then it caused
s/caused/causes/
> reading/writing to wrong GPU.
I see from other patches posted here, that [why] is put on a separate
line, so you do not need to indent the text.
[why]
These static …
>
> [fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
> in stack.
Same here, though *how* instead of *fix* seems more common.
s/Removed/Remove/
s/in stack/on the stack/
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan <Gavin.Wan@amd.com>
> Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe
Without the Gerrit URL that line is useless.
Kind regards.
Paul
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
> uint32_t timeout = 50000;
> uint32_t i, tmp;
> uint32_t ret = 0;
> - static void *scratch_reg0;
> - static void *scratch_reg1;
> - static void *scratch_reg2;
> - static void *scratch_reg3;
> - static void *spare_int;
> + void *scratch_reg0;
> + void *scratch_reg1;
> + void *scratch_reg2;
> + void *scratch_reg3;
> + void *spare_int;
>
> if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
> dev_err(adev->dev,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.
2022-04-14 17:58 ` Paul Menzel
@ 2022-04-14 18:34 ` Wan, Gavin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wan, Gavin @ 2022-04-14 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menzel; +Cc: amd-gfx
[AMD Official Use Only]
Dear Paul,
Thanks for you comments. Let me do it.
Thanks,
Gavin
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 1:59 PM
To: Wan, Gavin <Gavin.Wan@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW.
Dear Gavin,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 13.04.22 um 17:26 schrieb Gavin Wan:
Should you re-roll your patch (v2), please remove the dot/period from the end of the git commit message summary (subject).
> [why] These static variables saves the RLC Scratch registers address.
s/saves/save/
> When we installed multiple GPUs (for example: XGMI setting) and
s/installed/install/
> multiple GPUs call the function at same time. The RLC Scratch
… same time, the RLC …
> registers address are changed each other. Then it caused
s/caused/causes/
> reading/writing to wrong GPU.
I see from other patches posted here, that [why] is put on a separate line, so you do not need to indent the text.
[why]
These static …
>
> [fix] Removed the static from the variables. The variables are
> in stack.
Same here, though *how* instead of *fix* seems more common.
s/Removed/Remove/
s/in stack/on the stack/
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Wan <Gavin.Wan@amd.com>
> Change-Id: Iee78849291d4f7a9688ecc5165bec70ee85cdfbe
Without the Gerrit URL that line is useless.
Kind regards.
Paul
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> index d5eea031c3e3..d18a05a20566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
> @@ -868,11 +868,11 @@ static u32 amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 offset, u32 v
> uint32_t timeout = 50000;
> uint32_t i, tmp;
> uint32_t ret = 0;
> - static void *scratch_reg0;
> - static void *scratch_reg1;
> - static void *scratch_reg2;
> - static void *scratch_reg3;
> - static void *spare_int;
> + void *scratch_reg0;
> + void *scratch_reg1;
> + void *scratch_reg2;
> + void *scratch_reg3;
> + void *spare_int;
>
> if (!adev->gfx.rlc.rlcg_reg_access_supported) {
> dev_err(adev->dev,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-14 18:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-13 15:26 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Remove static from variable in RLCG Reg RW Gavin Wan
2022-04-14 14:24 ` Alex Deucher
2022-04-14 17:58 ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-14 18:34 ` Wan, Gavin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.