From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>, Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:08:51 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CADvbK_eMOPQfB2URNshOizSe9_j0dpbA47TVWSwctziFas3GaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201015174252.GB11030@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:42 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually.. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 03:27:41PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > ... > > Also add sysctl udp_port to allow changing the listening > > sock's port by users. > ... > > --- > > net/sctp/protocol.c | 5 +++++ > > net/sctp/sysctl.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) > > Xin, sorry for not noticing this earlier, but we need a documentation > update here for this new sysctl. This is important. Please add its > entry in ip-sysctl.rst. no problem, I will add it. > > > > > diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c > > index be002b7..79fb4b5 100644 > > --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c > > +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c > > @@ -1469,6 +1469,10 @@ static int __net_init sctp_ctrlsock_init(struct net *net) > > if (status) > > pr_err("Failed to initialize the SCTP control sock\n"); > > > > + status = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > + if (status) > > + pr_err("Failed to initialize the SCTP udp tunneling sock\n"); > ^^^ upper case please. > Nit. There are other occurrences of this. You mean we can remove this log, as it's been handled well in sctp_udp_sock_start()? > > > + > > return status; > ... > > + ret = proc_dointvec(&tbl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > > + if (write && ret == 0) { > > + struct sock *sk = net->sctp.ctl_sock; > > + > > + if (new_value > max || new_value < min) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + net->sctp.udp_port = new_value; > > + sctp_udp_sock_stop(net); > > So, if it would be disabling the encapsulation, it shouldn't be > calling _start() then, right? Like > > if (new_value) > ret = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > Otherwise _start() here will call ..._bind() with port 0, which then > will be a random one. right, somehow I thought it wouldn't bind with port 0. Thanks. > > > + ret = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > + if (ret) > > + net->sctp.udp_port = 0; > > + > > + /* Update the value in the control socket */ > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port); > > + release_sock(sk); > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > int sctp_sysctl_net_register(struct net *net) > > { > > struct ctl_table *table; > > -- > > 2.1.0 > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>, Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:08:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CADvbK_eMOPQfB2URNshOizSe9_j0dpbA47TVWSwctziFas3GaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201015174252.GB11030@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:42 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually.. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 03:27:41PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > ... > > Also add sysctl udp_port to allow changing the listening > > sock's port by users. > ... > > --- > > net/sctp/protocol.c | 5 +++++ > > net/sctp/sysctl.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) > > Xin, sorry for not noticing this earlier, but we need a documentation > update here for this new sysctl. This is important. Please add its > entry in ip-sysctl.rst. no problem, I will add it. > > > > > diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c > > index be002b7..79fb4b5 100644 > > --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c > > +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c > > @@ -1469,6 +1469,10 @@ static int __net_init sctp_ctrlsock_init(struct net *net) > > if (status) > > pr_err("Failed to initialize the SCTP control sock\n"); > > > > + status = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > + if (status) > > + pr_err("Failed to initialize the SCTP udp tunneling sock\n"); > ^^^ upper case please. > Nit. There are other occurrences of this. You mean we can remove this log, as it's been handled well in sctp_udp_sock_start()? > > > + > > return status; > ... > > + ret = proc_dointvec(&tbl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > > + if (write && ret = 0) { > > + struct sock *sk = net->sctp.ctl_sock; > > + > > + if (new_value > max || new_value < min) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + net->sctp.udp_port = new_value; > > + sctp_udp_sock_stop(net); > > So, if it would be disabling the encapsulation, it shouldn't be > calling _start() then, right? Like > > if (new_value) > ret = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > Otherwise _start() here will call ..._bind() with port 0, which then > will be a random one. right, somehow I thought it wouldn't bind with port 0. Thanks. > > > + ret = sctp_udp_sock_start(net); > > + if (ret) > > + net->sctp.udp_port = 0; > > + > > + /* Update the value in the control socket */ > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + sctp_sk(sk)->udp_port = htons(net->sctp.udp_port); > > + release_sock(sk); > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > int sctp_sysctl_net_register(struct net *net) > > { > > struct ctl_table *table; > > -- > > 2.1.0 > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 7:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-13 7:27 [PATCHv3 net-next 00/16] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 01/16] udp: check udp sock encap_type in __udp_lib_err Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 02/16] udp6: move the mss check after udp gso tunnel processing Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 03/16] udp: support sctp over udp in skb_udp_tunnel_segment Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 04/16] sctp: create udp4 sock and add its encap_rcv Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 05/16] sctp: create udp6 sock and set " Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 06/16] sctp: add encap_err_lookup for udp encap socks Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 07/16] sctp: add encap_port for netns sock asoc and transport Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 08/16] sctp: add SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT sockopt Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 09/16] sctp: allow changing transport encap_port by peer packets Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 10/16] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 11/16] sctp: call sk_setup_caps in sctp_packet_transmit instead Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 12/16] sctp: support for sending packet over udp4 sock Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 13/16] sctp: support for sending packet over udp6 sock Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 14/16] sctp: add the error cause for new encapsulation port restart Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 15/16] sctp: handle the init chunk matching an existing asoc Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks Xin Long 2020-10-13 7:27 ` Xin Long 2020-10-15 17:42 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2020-10-15 17:42 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2020-10-15 21:23 ` David Laight 2020-10-15 21:35 ` Michael Tuexen 2020-10-15 21:35 ` Michael Tuexen 2020-10-16 7:08 ` Xin Long [this message] 2020-10-16 7:08 ` Xin Long 2020-10-19 10:40 ` Xin Long 2020-10-19 10:40 ` Xin Long 2020-10-13 17:19 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 02/16] udp6: move the mss check after udp gso tunnel processing Willem de Bruijn 2020-10-13 17:19 ` Willem de Bruijn 2020-10-15 3:34 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 00/16] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Jakub Kicinski 2020-10-15 3:34 ` Jakub Kicinski 2020-10-15 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2020-10-15 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CADvbK_eMOPQfB2URNshOizSe9_j0dpbA47TVWSwctziFas3GaQ@mail.gmail.com \ --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=gnault@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \ --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \ --cc=tuexen@fh-muenster.de \ --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.