All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>,
	davem <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/15] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 20:24:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_fzASk9dLbHLNtLLc+uS7hLz6nDi2CESgN55Yh-o92+rQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_eXnzjDCypRkep9JqxBFV=cMXNkSZr4nyAaMiDc1VGXJg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 7:23 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 4:12 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:08 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:00:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > Hi Xin,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >
> > > I wonder how are you planning to fix this. It is quite entangled.
> > > This is not performance critical. Maybe the cleanest way out is to
> > > move it to a .c file.
> > >
> > > Adding a
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP) || defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP_MODULE)
> > > in there doesn't seem good.
> > >
> > > >    In file included from include/net/sctp/checksum.h:27,
> > > >                     from net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c:16:
> > > >    include/net/sctp/sctp.h: In function 'sctp_mtu_payload':
> > > > >> include/net/sctp/sctp.h:583:31: error: 'struct net' has no member named 'sctp'; did you mean 'ct'?
> > > >      583 |   if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
> > > >          |                               ^~~~
> > > >          |                               ct
> > > >
> > Here is actually another problem, I'm still thinking how to fix it.
> >
> > Now sctp_mtu_payload() returns different value depending on
> > net->sctp.udp_port. but net->sctp.udp_port can be changed by
> > "sysctl -w" anytime. so:
> >
> > In sctp_packet_config() it gets overhead/headroom by calling
> > sctp_mtu_payload(). When 'udp_port' is 0, it's IP+MAC header
> > size. Then if 'udp_port' is changed to 9899 by 'sysctl -w',
> > udphdr will also be added to the packet in sctp_v4_xmit(),
> > and later the headroom may not be enough for IP+MAC headers.
> >
> > I'm thinking to add sctp_sock->udp_port, and it'll be set when
> > the sock is created with net->udp_port. but not sure if we should
> > update sctp_sock->udp_port with  net->udp_port when sending packets?
> something like:
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 6614c9fdc51e..c379d805b9df 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> __u32 vtag,
>         if (asoc) {
>                 sk = asoc->base.sk;
>                 sp = sctp_sk(sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>         packet->overhead = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, 0, 0);
>         packet->size = packet->overhead;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 21d0ff1c6ab9..f5aba9086d33 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static inline struct sctp_chunk
> *sctp_make_op_error_limited(
>         if (asoc) {
>                 size = min_t(size_t, size, asoc->pathmtu);
>                 sp = sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>
>         size = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, size, sizeof(struct sctp_errhdr));
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 8edab1533057..3e7f81d63d2e 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
>         sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
>                              sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, net->sctp.ctl_sock, NULL);
> +
>         packet = &transport->packet;
>         sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
>         sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index d793dfa94682..e5de5f98be0c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1550,6 +1550,17 @@ static int sctp_error(struct sock *sk, int
> flags, int err)
>         return err;
>  }
>
> +void sctp_sock_check_udp_port(struct net* net, struct sctp_sock *sp,
> +                             struct sctp_association *asoc)
> +{
> +       if (likely(sp->udp_port == net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (asoc && (!sp->udp_port || !net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
> +       sp->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
> +}
> +
>  /* API 3.1.3 sendmsg() - UDP Style Syntax
>   *
>   * An application uses sendmsg() and recvmsg() calls to transmit data to
> @@ -1795,6 +1806,8 @@ static int sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(struct
> sctp_association *asoc,
>                         goto err;
>         }
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, sp, asoc);
> +
>         if (sp->disable_fragments && msg_len > asoc->frag_point) {
>                 err = -EMSGSIZE;
>                 goto err;

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index 6408bbb1b95d..86f74f2fe6de 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static inline __u32 sctp_mtu_payload(const struct
sctp_sock *sp,

        if (sp) {
                overhead += sp->pf->af->net_header_len;
-               if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
+               if (sp->udp_port)
                        overhead += sizeof(struct udphdr);
        } else {
                overhead += sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
index 6614c9fdc51e..c96b13ec72f4 100644
--- a/net/sctp/output.c
+++ b/net/sctp/output.c
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
__u32 vtag,
        if (asoc) {
                sk = asoc->base.sk;
                sp = sctp_sk(sk);
+
+               if (unlikely(sp->udp_port != sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port)) {
+                       __u16 port = sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port;
+
+                       if (!sp->udp_port || !port)
+                               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
+                       sp->udp_port = port;
+               }
        }
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 8edab1533057..8deb9d1554e9 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
        sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
                             sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));

+       sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock)->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
+
        packet = &transport->packet;
        sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
        sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);

Actually doing this is enough, more simple and clear.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>,
	davem <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/15] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:24:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_fzASk9dLbHLNtLLc+uS7hLz6nDi2CESgN55Yh-o92+rQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_eXnzjDCypRkep9JqxBFV=cMXNkSZr4nyAaMiDc1VGXJg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 7:23 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 4:12 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:08 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:00:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > Hi Xin,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >
> > > I wonder how are you planning to fix this. It is quite entangled.
> > > This is not performance critical. Maybe the cleanest way out is to
> > > move it to a .c file.
> > >
> > > Adding a
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP) || defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP_MODULE)
> > > in there doesn't seem good.
> > >
> > > >    In file included from include/net/sctp/checksum.h:27,
> > > >                     from net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c:16:
> > > >    include/net/sctp/sctp.h: In function 'sctp_mtu_payload':
> > > > >> include/net/sctp/sctp.h:583:31: error: 'struct net' has no member named 'sctp'; did you mean 'ct'?
> > > >      583 |   if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
> > > >          |                               ^~~~
> > > >          |                               ct
> > > >
> > Here is actually another problem, I'm still thinking how to fix it.
> >
> > Now sctp_mtu_payload() returns different value depending on
> > net->sctp.udp_port. but net->sctp.udp_port can be changed by
> > "sysctl -w" anytime. so:
> >
> > In sctp_packet_config() it gets overhead/headroom by calling
> > sctp_mtu_payload(). When 'udp_port' is 0, it's IP+MAC header
> > size. Then if 'udp_port' is changed to 9899 by 'sysctl -w',
> > udphdr will also be added to the packet in sctp_v4_xmit(),
> > and later the headroom may not be enough for IP+MAC headers.
> >
> > I'm thinking to add sctp_sock->udp_port, and it'll be set when
> > the sock is created with net->udp_port. but not sure if we should
> > update sctp_sock->udp_port with  net->udp_port when sending packets?
> something like:
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 6614c9fdc51e..c379d805b9df 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> __u32 vtag,
>         if (asoc) {
>                 sk = asoc->base.sk;
>                 sp = sctp_sk(sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>         packet->overhead = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, 0, 0);
>         packet->size = packet->overhead;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 21d0ff1c6ab9..f5aba9086d33 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static inline struct sctp_chunk
> *sctp_make_op_error_limited(
>         if (asoc) {
>                 size = min_t(size_t, size, asoc->pathmtu);
>                 sp = sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>
>         size = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, size, sizeof(struct sctp_errhdr));
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 8edab1533057..3e7f81d63d2e 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
>         sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
>                              sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, net->sctp.ctl_sock, NULL);
> +
>         packet = &transport->packet;
>         sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
>         sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index d793dfa94682..e5de5f98be0c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1550,6 +1550,17 @@ static int sctp_error(struct sock *sk, int
> flags, int err)
>         return err;
>  }
>
> +void sctp_sock_check_udp_port(struct net* net, struct sctp_sock *sp,
> +                             struct sctp_association *asoc)
> +{
> +       if (likely(sp->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (asoc && (!sp->udp_port || !net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
> +       sp->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
> +}
> +
>  /* API 3.1.3 sendmsg() - UDP Style Syntax
>   *
>   * An application uses sendmsg() and recvmsg() calls to transmit data to
> @@ -1795,6 +1806,8 @@ static int sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(struct
> sctp_association *asoc,
>                         goto err;
>         }
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, sp, asoc);
> +
>         if (sp->disable_fragments && msg_len > asoc->frag_point) {
>                 err = -EMSGSIZE;
>                 goto err;

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index 6408bbb1b95d..86f74f2fe6de 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static inline __u32 sctp_mtu_payload(const struct
sctp_sock *sp,

        if (sp) {
                overhead += sp->pf->af->net_header_len;
-               if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
+               if (sp->udp_port)
                        overhead += sizeof(struct udphdr);
        } else {
                overhead += sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
index 6614c9fdc51e..c96b13ec72f4 100644
--- a/net/sctp/output.c
+++ b/net/sctp/output.c
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
__u32 vtag,
        if (asoc) {
                sk = asoc->base.sk;
                sp = sctp_sk(sk);
+
+               if (unlikely(sp->udp_port != sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port)) {
+                       __u16 port = sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port;
+
+                       if (!sp->udp_port || !port)
+                               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
+                       sp->udp_port = port;
+               }
        }
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 8edab1533057..8deb9d1554e9 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
        sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
                             sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));

+       sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock)->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
+
        packet = &transport->packet;
        sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
        sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);

Actually doing this is enough, more simple and clear.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/15] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:24:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_fzASk9dLbHLNtLLc+uS7hLz6nDi2CESgN55Yh-o92+rQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_eXnzjDCypRkep9JqxBFV=cMXNkSZr4nyAaMiDc1VGXJg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6754 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 7:23 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 4:12 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:08 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:00:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > Hi Xin,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >
> > > I wonder how are you planning to fix this. It is quite entangled.
> > > This is not performance critical. Maybe the cleanest way out is to
> > > move it to a .c file.
> > >
> > > Adding a
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP) || defined(CONFIG_IP_SCTP_MODULE)
> > > in there doesn't seem good.
> > >
> > > >    In file included from include/net/sctp/checksum.h:27,
> > > >                     from net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c:16:
> > > >    include/net/sctp/sctp.h: In function 'sctp_mtu_payload':
> > > > >> include/net/sctp/sctp.h:583:31: error: 'struct net' has no member named 'sctp'; did you mean 'ct'?
> > > >      583 |   if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
> > > >          |                               ^~~~
> > > >          |                               ct
> > > >
> > Here is actually another problem, I'm still thinking how to fix it.
> >
> > Now sctp_mtu_payload() returns different value depending on
> > net->sctp.udp_port. but net->sctp.udp_port can be changed by
> > "sysctl -w" anytime. so:
> >
> > In sctp_packet_config() it gets overhead/headroom by calling
> > sctp_mtu_payload(). When 'udp_port' is 0, it's IP+MAC header
> > size. Then if 'udp_port' is changed to 9899 by 'sysctl -w',
> > udphdr will also be added to the packet in sctp_v4_xmit(),
> > and later the headroom may not be enough for IP+MAC headers.
> >
> > I'm thinking to add sctp_sock->udp_port, and it'll be set when
> > the sock is created with net->udp_port. but not sure if we should
> > update sctp_sock->udp_port with  net->udp_port when sending packets?
> something like:
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 6614c9fdc51e..c379d805b9df 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> __u32 vtag,
>         if (asoc) {
>                 sk = asoc->base.sk;
>                 sp = sctp_sk(sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>         packet->overhead = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, 0, 0);
>         packet->size = packet->overhead;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 21d0ff1c6ab9..f5aba9086d33 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -1250,6 +1250,7 @@ static inline struct sctp_chunk
> *sctp_make_op_error_limited(
>         if (asoc) {
>                 size = min_t(size_t, size, asoc->pathmtu);
>                 sp = sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk);
> +               sctp_sock_check_udp_port(sock_net(sk), sp, asoc);
>         }
>
>         size = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, size, sizeof(struct sctp_errhdr));
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 8edab1533057..3e7f81d63d2e 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
>         sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
>                              sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, net->sctp.ctl_sock, NULL);
> +
>         packet = &transport->packet;
>         sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
>         sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index d793dfa94682..e5de5f98be0c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1550,6 +1550,17 @@ static int sctp_error(struct sock *sk, int
> flags, int err)
>         return err;
>  }
>
> +void sctp_sock_check_udp_port(struct net* net, struct sctp_sock *sp,
> +                             struct sctp_association *asoc)
> +{
> +       if (likely(sp->udp_port == net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (asoc && (!sp->udp_port || !net->sctp.udp_port))
> +               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
> +       sp->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
> +}
> +
>  /* API 3.1.3 sendmsg() - UDP Style Syntax
>   *
>   * An application uses sendmsg() and recvmsg() calls to transmit data to
> @@ -1795,6 +1806,8 @@ static int sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(struct
> sctp_association *asoc,
>                         goto err;
>         }
>
> +       sctp_sock_check_udp_port(net, sp, asoc);
> +
>         if (sp->disable_fragments && msg_len > asoc->frag_point) {
>                 err = -EMSGSIZE;
>                 goto err;

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index 6408bbb1b95d..86f74f2fe6de 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static inline __u32 sctp_mtu_payload(const struct
sctp_sock *sp,

        if (sp) {
                overhead += sp->pf->af->net_header_len;
-               if (sock_net(&sp->inet.sk)->sctp.udp_port)
+               if (sp->udp_port)
                        overhead += sizeof(struct udphdr);
        } else {
                overhead += sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
index 6614c9fdc51e..c96b13ec72f4 100644
--- a/net/sctp/output.c
+++ b/net/sctp/output.c
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ void sctp_packet_config(struct sctp_packet *packet,
__u32 vtag,
        if (asoc) {
                sk = asoc->base.sk;
                sp = sctp_sk(sk);
+
+               if (unlikely(sp->udp_port != sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port)) {
+                       __u16 port = sock_net(sk)->sctp.udp_port;
+
+                       if (!sp->udp_port || !port)
+                               sctp_assoc_update_frag_point(asoc);
+                       sp->udp_port = port;
+               }
        }
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 8edab1533057..8deb9d1554e9 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -6276,6 +6276,8 @@ static struct sctp_packet *sctp_ootb_pkt_new(
        sctp_transport_route(transport, (union sctp_addr *)&chunk->dest,
                             sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock));

+       sctp_sk(net->sctp.ctl_sock)->udp_port = net->sctp.udp_port;
+
        packet = &transport->packet;
        sctp_packet_init(packet, transport, sport, dport);
        sctp_packet_config(packet, vtag, 0);

Actually doing this is enough, more simple and clear.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-03 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 13:48 [PATCH net-next 00/15] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48 ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] udp: check udp sock encap_type in __udp_lib_err Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48   ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48   ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] udp6: move the mss check after udp gso tunnel processing Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48     ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48     ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] udp: do checksum properly in skb_udp_tunnel_segment Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48       ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48       ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] udp: support sctp over udp " Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48         ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48         ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] sctp: create udp4 sock and add its encap_rcv Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48           ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48           ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] sctp: create udp6 sock and set " Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48             ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48             ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] sctp: add encap_err_lookup for udp encap socks Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:48               ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49               ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] sctp: add encap_port for netns sock asoc and transport Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                 ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] sctp: add SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT sockopt Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                   ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                   ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] sctp: allow changing transport encap_port by peer packets Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                     ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                     ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                       ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                       ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] sctp: call sk_setup_caps in sctp_packet_transmit instead Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                         ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                         ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] sctp: support for sending packet over udp4 sock Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                           ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                           ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] sctp: support for sending packet over udp6 sock Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                             ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                             ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks Xin Long
2020-09-29 13:49                               ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  4:12                               ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:12                                 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  8:20                                 ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  8:20                                   ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 16:25                           ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] sctp: support for sending packet over udp4 sock kernel test robot
2020-09-29 16:25                             ` kernel test robot
2020-09-29 16:25                             ` kernel test robot
2020-09-30  6:26                             ` Xin Long
2020-09-30  6:26                               ` Xin Long
2020-09-30  6:26                               ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 19:19                           ` kernel test robot
2020-09-29 19:19                             ` kernel test robot
2020-09-29 19:19                             ` kernel test robot
2020-10-03  4:09                         ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] sctp: call sk_setup_caps in sctp_packet_transmit instead Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:09                           ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  7:45                           ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  7:45                             ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 19:00                       ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set kernel test robot
2020-09-29 19:00                         ` kernel test robot
2020-09-29 19:00                         ` kernel test robot
2020-10-03  4:08                         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:08                           ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:08                           ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  7:57                           ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  8:12                             ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  8:12                             ` Xin Long
2020-10-03 11:23                             ` Xin Long
2020-10-03 11:23                               ` Xin Long
2020-10-03 11:23                               ` Xin Long
2020-10-03 12:24                               ` Xin Long [this message]
2020-10-03 12:24                                 ` Xin Long
2020-10-03 12:24                                 ` Xin Long
2020-10-05 19:01                                 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-05 19:01                                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-05 19:01                                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-05 20:08                                   ` Michael Tuexen
2020-10-05 20:08                                     ` Michael Tuexen
2020-10-08  9:37                                   ` Xin Long
2020-10-08  9:37                                     ` Xin Long
2020-10-08  9:37                                     ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  4:07                       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:07                         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  7:54                         ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  7:54                           ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  4:06                     ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] sctp: allow changing transport encap_port by peer packets Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:06                       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:05                   ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] sctp: add SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT sockopt Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:05                     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  7:41                     ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  7:41                       ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  4:04       ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] udp: do checksum properly in skb_udp_tunnel_segment Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  4:04         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-03  7:40         ` Xin Long
2020-10-03  7:40           ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 16:39 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Michael Tuexen
2020-09-29 16:39   ` Michael Tuexen
2020-09-29 17:49   ` Xin Long
2020-09-29 18:04     ` Xin Long
2020-10-01 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-01 12:41   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADvbK_fzASk9dLbHLNtLLc+uS7hLz6nDi2CESgN55Yh-o92+rQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tuexen@fh-muenster.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.