Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Joseph Yasi]

Hi,

I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.

Thanks,
Joe Yasi

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Ben Hutchings]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 793 bytes --]

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
> v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
> v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
> HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.

This was previously requested
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).

For now, I think we should delete the current version.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:

> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> 
> This was previously requested
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).

(c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)

Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a summary
of the firmware situation here.

Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant
gave us license to re-distribute.

According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same
for two different chips. On their words:

	"The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."

The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c,
cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:

$ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media
drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"

$ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
#define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
#define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
#define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"

Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at 
linux-firmware:

-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
-rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw

And those are their corresponding md5sum:

7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw

So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are
identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.

Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their
zip file, we have:

-r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
-r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw

With different checksums:

b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

So:
1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
   Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
   Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
   it on their driver.

2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
   equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
   a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
   firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.

What's more intriguing is that the firmware size is so different
between those two versions. Also, having the encoder and the 
decoder using the same firmware looks weird.

In any case, it is clear, from the reports, that the cx25840 driver
doesn't work with the 16KB v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware provided by
Conexant.

It should also be noticed that the other firmwares used by cx25840 driver
also has only 16 KB.

So, I can see two possible situations here:

1) Conexant shipped us a wrong v4l-cx23885-enc.fw;

2) Hauppauge uses a completely different version for it, perhaps
developed by them, and the driver was written to take that special
version into account. So, the driver is not currently prepared to
use the Conexant firmware for cx23885.

As I didn't work on the development of this driver, nor I worked with
HVR1800 development, I can't tell what of the above is the case.

There are two possible solutions to solve the issue it:

1) Conexant could help us to make the cx23885 driver to work with
   their firmware, or release us the right firmware, (if this was simply a
   mistake when they sent us the firmwares). The driver could be smart
   enough to work with either firmware (it should be easy to distinguish
   between them, due to the huge difference on its size);

2) Hauppauge should re-license their v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware to
   allow it to be shipped together with linux-firmware;

> For now, I think we should delete the current version.

That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
could help solving this dilema.

Regards,
Mauro

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Joseph Yasi]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
>
>> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
>> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
>> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
>> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
>> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
>>
>> This was previously requested
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
>
> (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
>
> Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a summary
> of the firmware situation here.
>
> Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant
> gave us license to re-distribute.
>
> According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same
> for two different chips. On their words:
>
>         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
>
> The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c,
> cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
>
> $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media
> drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
>
> $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
>
> Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> linux-firmware:
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
>
> And those are their corresponding md5sum:
>
> 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
>
> So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are
> identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
>
> Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their
> zip file, we have:
>
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
>
> With different checksums:
>
> b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
>
> So:
> 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
>    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
>    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
>    it on their driver.

FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest
Hauppauge driver:
http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the
same as the current one in git:
a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw

but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

> 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
>    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
>    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
>    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
>

>> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
>
> That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
> could help solving this dilema.

I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work
with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying
to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten
everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu
repositories.

Thanks,
Joe Yasi

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Ben Hutchings]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 837 bytes --]

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 11:36 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
[...]
> >> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> >
> > That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
> > could help solving this dilema.
> 
> I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work
> with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying
> to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten
> everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu
> repositories.

Done.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Andy Walls]

Hi,

Instead of answering points in the email chain, I'm just going to
provide the best information I have.

I. Definitions:
- Thresher: broadcast video decoder
- Merlin:   broadcast audio system detection microcontroller and decoder
- Mako:     Thresher + Merlin

- CX2583[67]:   stand-alone Thresher
- CX2584[0123]: stand-alone Mako

- CX23415: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + MPEG Decoder, JHVM
- CX23416: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM
- CX23417: Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM

- CX23418: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + Mako, ARM

- CX2388[578]: PCIe host Video capture + Mako
- CX2310[012]: USB host Video capture + Mako

II. Notes about the Mako core:
1. The Merlin in every Mako uses a 16 kB firmware image.  (Technically
it is 16382 bytes instead of 16384 bytes, IIRC.)

2. The Merlin implementations appear to vary from one another, but there
are at least two distinct groupings based on hardware register
implementation:
   a. Older: CX2584[0123] (v4l-cx25840.fw)
             CX23418      (v4l-cx23418-dig.fw)

   b. Newer: CX2388[578]  (v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw)
             CX231[012]   (v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw)

The firmwares between the two groups are not interchangeable.  For
example, IIRC the older Merlin audio firmwares might manipulate video
U,V saturation registers on a CX23885.

3. There seem to be a large number of versions of Merlin firmware files,
upon examining Windows driver CD I have.  It is very possible that two
different Merlin firmware files, with different MD5 sums, are both
intended to work on the same chip, e.g. CX23885.

4. There appears to be no way to tell what chip for which a Merlin
firmware file is intended, without disassembling the Merlin firmware
file and painfully examining the assembly code.  A violation of most, if
not all, of the license agreements.

5. With the exception of the CX23418 chip and cx18 driver, all
Mako/Merlin stuff in Linux is handled by the cx25840 driver.  The cx18
driver has its own fork of cx25840-*.c in cx18-av-*.c


III. Notes on the MPEG Encoders:
1. The MPEG encoder firmware images are never 16 kB; they are around 10
times larger than that, or larger.

2. The CX2341[56] chips both use the same MPEG encoder firmware image.
(v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw)

3. It is very plausible that the CX23417 can use the same MPEG Encoder
firmware image as a CX23416, I just don't know for sure.

4. The CX23418 MPEG encoder firmware images (v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw, 
v4l-cx23418-apu.fw) and distinct from the firmware for the CX2341[567]
chips, as the underlying embedded processor has a different machine
architecture and instruction set.


IV. Known good firmware images

1. CX23418 MPEG encoder and CX23418 Merlin/Mako:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/cx18-firmware.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)
e8188c7542a82a8d7cdc2720ddfb3a3e CX23418 Firmware Video Firmware Release
Notes.pdf
6686a1673585585f5017c13ada343f98 LICENSE
588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw

Last I checked months ago, the CX23418 APU, CPU, and Merlin firmware
images all matched linuxtv.org's copies.

This CX23418 Merlin image does not match the CX23418 Merlin image that
Hauppauge is shipping with the HVR-1600 driver CD:
c529278bbceb51d68d3fc1993657c901  hcw18mlC.rom

So I now have doubts as to whether the CX23418 Merlin firmware file
being used under Linux is correct. :(


2. CX2341[56] MPEG decoder/encoder, CX2584[0123] Merlin, and PVRUSB
microcontroller
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20070217.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

(The licenses in these files appear to be OK if the firmware is used
with Hauppauge products.  For any other use, consult your legal
council.)

The above archives are identical, except for the v4l-cx25840.fw Merlin
firmware file.

The 2007 archive has the "original" CX2584[0123] Merlin firmware,

The 2008 archive has the CX23418 Merlin firmware (which might be a bad
thing). I think the CX23418 Merlin firmware actually causes the
user-reported ivtv "tinny-audio" problem, when used with the
CX2584[0123] chips.

Please note: The ivtv driver was coded to a very specific version of the
v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw image, due the ivtv driver's use of firmware specific
memory locations to work around some chip and firmware bugs.  No other
version of this firmware image is recommended for the ivtv driver.


3. CX2388[578] MPEG encoder (aka. CX23417) firmware
Aside from Conextant, I don't know where to get a redistributable copy,
specifically intended for the CX23417.
The v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw file for the CX23416 might work, after being
renamed:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

4. CX2388[578] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.

5. CX2310[012] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.


Regards,
Andy

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:22 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
> > > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
> > > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
> > > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> > 
> > This was previously requested
> > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> 
> (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> 
> Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a summary
> of the firmware situation here.
> 
> Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant
> gave us license to re-distribute.
> 
> According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same
> for two different chips. On their words:
> 
> 	"The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> 
> The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c,
> cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> 
> $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media
> drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> 
> $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> 
> Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at 
> linux-firmware:
> 
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> 
> 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are
> identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> 
> Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their
> zip file, we have:
> 
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 
> With different checksums:
> 
> b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> So:
> 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
>    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
>    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
>    it on their driver.
> 
> 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
>    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
>    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
>    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> 
> What's more intriguing is that the firmware size is so different
> between those two versions. Also, having the encoder and the 
> decoder using the same firmware looks weird.
> 
> In any case, it is clear, from the reports, that the cx25840 driver
> doesn't work with the 16KB v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware provided by
> Conexant.
> 
> It should also be noticed that the other firmwares used by cx25840 driver
> also has only 16 KB.
> 
> So, I can see two possible situations here:
> 
> 1) Conexant shipped us a wrong v4l-cx23885-enc.fw;
> 
> 2) Hauppauge uses a completely different version for it, perhaps
> developed by them, and the driver was written to take that special
> version into account. So, the driver is not currently prepared to
> use the Conexant firmware for cx23885.
> 
> As I didn't work on the development of this driver, nor I worked with
> HVR1800 development, I can't tell what of the above is the case.
> 
> There are two possible solutions to solve the issue it:
> 
> 1) Conexant could help us to make the cx23885 driver to work with
>    their firmware, or release us the right firmware, (if this was simply a
>    mistake when they sent us the firmwares). The driver could be smart
>    enough to work with either firmware (it should be easy to distinguish
>    between them, due to the huge difference on its size);
> 
> 2) Hauppauge should re-license their v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware to
>    allow it to be shipped together with linux-firmware;
> 
> > For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> 
> That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
> could help solving this dilema.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Sri Deevi]

Mauro and All,

Apologies for delay in reply.

Whatever firmware works keep that one as reference. If you guys think the firmware from Hauppauge is latest, please keep that and I can get the required permissions as needed. 

Please do let me know whatever is the plan. Currently, there are no updates to this firmware as I know.

Thanks
Sri

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Yasi [mailto:joe.yasi@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:36 AM
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans Verkuil
Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
>
>> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the 
>> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
>> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the 
>> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from 
>> > the
>> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
>>
>> This was previously requested
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
>
> (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
>
> Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a 
> summary of the firmware situation here.
>
> Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant 
> gave us license to re-distribute.
>
> According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same for 
> two different chips. On their words:
>
>         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
>
> The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c, 
> cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
>
> $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media 
> drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
>
> $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
>
> Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> linux-firmware:
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
>
> And those are their corresponding md5sum:
>
> 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw 
> 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw 
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
>
> So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are 
> identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
>
> Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw and 
> v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their zip 
> file, we have:
>
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
>
> With different checksums:
>
> b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
>
> So:
> 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
>    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
>    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
>    it on their driver.

FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest Hauppauge driver:
http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the same as the current one in git:
a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw

but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

> 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
>    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
>    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
>    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
>

>> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
>
> That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or 
> Hauppauge could help solving this dilema.

I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu repositories.

Thanks,
Joe Yasi

Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** 

"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 

********************************************************************** 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Sri Deevi]

Andy,

Thanks for the composition. Most of all you are right about everything. 

I hope you got all the firmwares that are working properly with hardware you guys have been using. To my knowledge there were no updates in recent past. 

Merlin firmware should be more or less same as all the others. But there are subtle differences between PCIe version vs. USB version and so on. So, I would suggest them keep separated and please use whatever is provided according to the particular chip. Also, since the windows versions are the most supported ones, it is possible that there might be some updates to the firmware, but not sure about them. I will forward this mail to internal team and see if I can get answers to the same. Please bear with me as it might take some time..

Your point III.2 and III.3 , they both should be same. It is just a chip variation for marketing I think. It was done due to some chip fabrication reasons or so. I believe they should be one and same.

CX23418 MPEG encoder firmware was written in different language. Originally they were written in different language. So, is the difference. I can't go more in details as myself not aware of complete details.

>> 4. CX2388[578] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for redistribution.

>> 5. CX2310[012] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for redistribution.

I don't think we have any updates to the above to my knowledge. For #5, what I made it available are good to use. 

About the permissions to release, Do let me know the details of the same, I will get you the permissions needed. 

Hope it helps,
Thanks
Sri


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Walls [mailto:awalls@md.metrocast.net] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 1:38 PM
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Ben Hutchings; Joseph Yasi; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Hans Verkuil
Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

Hi,

Instead of answering points in the email chain, I'm just going to provide the best information I have.

I. Definitions:
- Thresher: broadcast video decoder
- Merlin:   broadcast audio system detection microcontroller and decoder
- Mako:     Thresher + Merlin

- CX2583[67]:   stand-alone Thresher
- CX2584[0123]: stand-alone Mako

- CX23415: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + MPEG Decoder, JHVM
- CX23416: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM
- CX23417: Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM

- CX23418: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + Mako, ARM

- CX2388[578]: PCIe host Video capture + Mako
- CX2310[012]: USB host Video capture + Mako

II. Notes about the Mako core:
1. The Merlin in every Mako uses a 16 kB firmware image.  (Technically it is 16382 bytes instead of 16384 bytes, IIRC.)

2. The Merlin implementations appear to vary from one another, but there are at least two distinct groupings based on hardware register
implementation:
   a. Older: CX2584[0123] (v4l-cx25840.fw)
             CX23418      (v4l-cx23418-dig.fw)

   b. Newer: CX2388[578]  (v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw)
             CX231[012]   (v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw)

The firmwares between the two groups are not interchangeable.  For example, IIRC the older Merlin audio firmwares might manipulate video U,V saturation registers on a CX23885.

3. There seem to be a large number of versions of Merlin firmware files, upon examining Windows driver CD I have.  It is very possible that two different Merlin firmware files, with different MD5 sums, are both intended to work on the same chip, e.g. CX23885.

4. There appears to be no way to tell what chip for which a Merlin firmware file is intended, without disassembling the Merlin firmware file and painfully examining the assembly code.  A violation of most, if not all, of the license agreements.

5. With the exception of the CX23418 chip and cx18 driver, all Mako/Merlin stuff in Linux is handled by the cx25840 driver.  The cx18 driver has its own fork of cx25840-*.c in cx18-av-*.c


III. Notes on the MPEG Encoders:
1. The MPEG encoder firmware images are never 16 kB; they are around 10 times larger than that, or larger.

2. The CX2341[56] chips both use the same MPEG encoder firmware image.
(v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw)

3. It is very plausible that the CX23417 can use the same MPEG Encoder firmware image as a CX23416, I just don't know for sure.

4. The CX23418 MPEG encoder firmware images (v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw,
v4l-cx23418-apu.fw) and distinct from the firmware for the CX2341[567] chips, as the underlying embedded processor has a different machine architecture and instruction set.


IV. Known good firmware images

1. CX23418 MPEG encoder and CX23418 Merlin/Mako:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/cx18-firmware.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)
e8188c7542a82a8d7cdc2720ddfb3a3e CX23418 Firmware Video Firmware Release
Notes.pdf
6686a1673585585f5017c13ada343f98 LICENSE
588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw

Last I checked months ago, the CX23418 APU, CPU, and Merlin firmware
images all matched linuxtv.org's copies.

This CX23418 Merlin image does not match the CX23418 Merlin image that
Hauppauge is shipping with the HVR-1600 driver CD:
c529278bbceb51d68d3fc1993657c901  hcw18mlC.rom

So I now have doubts as to whether the CX23418 Merlin firmware file
being used under Linux is correct. :(


2. CX2341[56] MPEG decoder/encoder, CX2584[0123] Merlin, and PVRUSB
microcontroller
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20070217.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

(The licenses in these files appear to be OK if the firmware is used
with Hauppauge products.  For any other use, consult your legal
council.)

The above archives are identical, except for the v4l-cx25840.fw Merlin
firmware file.

The 2007 archive has the "original" CX2584[0123] Merlin firmware,

The 2008 archive has the CX23418 Merlin firmware (which might be a bad
thing). I think the CX23418 Merlin firmware actually causes the
user-reported ivtv "tinny-audio" problem, when used with the
CX2584[0123] chips.

Please note: The ivtv driver was coded to a very specific version of the
v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw image, due the ivtv driver's use of firmware specific
memory locations to work around some chip and firmware bugs.  No other
version of this firmware image is recommended for the ivtv driver.


3. CX2388[578] MPEG encoder (aka. CX23417) firmware
Aside from Conextant, I don't know where to get a redistributable copy,
specifically intended for the CX23417.
The v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw file for the CX23416 might work, after being
renamed:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

4. CX2388[578] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.

5. CX2310[012] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.


Regards,
Andy

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:22 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
> > > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
> > > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
> > > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> > 
> > This was previously requested
> > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> 
> (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> 
> Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a summary
> of the firmware situation here.
> 
> Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant
> gave us license to re-distribute.
> 
> According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same
> for two different chips. On their words:
> 
> 	"The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> 
> The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c,
> cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> 
> $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media
> drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> 
> $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> 
> Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at 
> linux-firmware:
> 
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> 
> 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are
> identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> 
> Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their
> zip file, we have:
> 
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 
> With different checksums:
> 
> b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> So:
> 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
>    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
>    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
>    it on their driver.
> 
> 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
>    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
>    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
>    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> 
> What's more intriguing is that the firmware size is so different
> between those two versions. Also, having the encoder and the 
> decoder using the same firmware looks weird.
> 
> In any case, it is clear, from the reports, that the cx25840 driver
> doesn't work with the 16KB v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware provided by
> Conexant.
> 
> It should also be noticed that the other firmwares used by cx25840 driver
> also has only 16 KB.
> 
> So, I can see two possible situations here:
> 
> 1) Conexant shipped us a wrong v4l-cx23885-enc.fw;
> 
> 2) Hauppauge uses a completely different version for it, perhaps
> developed by them, and the driver was written to take that special
> version into account. So, the driver is not currently prepared to
> use the Conexant firmware for cx23885.
> 
> As I didn't work on the development of this driver, nor I worked with
> HVR1800 development, I can't tell what of the above is the case.
> 
> There are two possible solutions to solve the issue it:
> 
> 1) Conexant could help us to make the cx23885 driver to work with
>    their firmware, or release us the right firmware, (if this was simply a
>    mistake when they sent us the firmwares). The driver could be smart
>    enough to work with either firmware (it should be easy to distinguish
>    between them, due to the huge difference on its size);
> 
> 2) Hauppauge should re-license their v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware to
>    allow it to be shipped together with linux-firmware;
> 
> > For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> 
> That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
> could help solving this dilema.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** 

"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 

********************************************************************** 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:37:07 -0800
"Sri Deevi" <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:

> Mauro and All,
> 
> Apologies for delay in reply.
> 
> Whatever firmware works keep that one as reference. If you guys think the firmware from Hauppauge is latest, please keep that and I can get the required permissions as needed. 
> 
> Please do let me know whatever is the plan. Currently, there are no updates to this firmware as I know.

David merged yesterday at linux-firmware a patch from Ben that removes this
firmware from the tree:

> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

As this firmware is known to not work with the Hauppauge devices.

The better would be if you could give us permission to redistribute,
instead, the firmware found on Hauppauge's site (Windows driver only
version there):
	http://www.hauppauge.com/site/support/support_hvr1500.html
With points to:
	http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip

The firmware there is this one:
	-rw-rw-r-- 1 mchehab mchehab 376836 Mar 17  2006 85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
	1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom

With matches with the one it is known to work with this hardware:

> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

That would fix the main firmware issue.

Regards,
Mauro


> 
> Thanks
> Sri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Yasi [mailto:joe.yasi@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:36 AM
> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> Cc: Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans Verkuil
> Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the 
> >> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> >> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the 
> >> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from 
> >> > the
> >> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> >>
> >> This was previously requested
> >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> >
> > (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> >
> > Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a 
> > summary of the firmware situation here.
> >
> > Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant 
> > gave us license to re-distribute.
> >
> > According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same for 
> > two different chips. On their words:
> >
> >         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> >
> > The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c, 
> > cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> >
> > $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media 
> > drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> >
> > $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> > #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> > #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> > #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> >
> > Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> > linux-firmware:
> >
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> >
> > And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> >
> > 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw 
> > 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw 
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> >
> > So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are 
> > identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> >
> > Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw and 
> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their zip 
> > file, we have:
> >
> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> >
> > With different checksums:
> >
> > b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> >
> > So:
> > 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
> >    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
> >    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
> >    it on their driver.
> 
> FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest Hauppauge driver:
> http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the same as the current one in git:
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 
> but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> > 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
> >    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
> >    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
> >    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> >
> 
> >> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> >
> > That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or 
> > Hauppauge could help solving this dilema.
> 
> I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu repositories.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe Yasi
> 
> Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** 
> 
> "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 
> 
> ********************************************************************** 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

RE: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Sri Deevi]

Mauro,

Are you asking Hauppauge's version of ROM to be distributed with permissions ? 
Please clarify. 

If that is the case, I may not be able to do that. 

Michael,

If you can give me the details of when was the last time you got updates from Conexant, then I can try to help in this regard.

Thanks
Sri

-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mchehab@redhat.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:07 AM
To: Sri Deevi
Cc: Joseph Yasi; Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans Verkuil
Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:37:07 -0800
"Sri Deevi" <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:

> Mauro and All,
> 
> Apologies for delay in reply.
> 
> Whatever firmware works keep that one as reference. If you guys think the firmware from Hauppauge is latest, please keep that and I can get the required permissions as needed. 
> 
> Please do let me know whatever is the plan. Currently, there are no updates to this firmware as I know.

David merged yesterday at linux-firmware a patch from Ben that removes this firmware from the tree:

> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

As this firmware is known to not work with the Hauppauge devices.

The better would be if you could give us permission to redistribute, instead, the firmware found on Hauppauge's site (Windows driver only version there):
	http://www.hauppauge.com/site/support/support_hvr1500.html
With points to:
	http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip

The firmware there is this one:
	-rw-rw-r-- 1 mchehab mchehab 376836 Mar 17  2006 85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
	1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom

With matches with the one it is known to work with this hardware:

> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw

That would fix the main firmware issue.

Regards,
Mauro


> 
> Thanks
> Sri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Yasi [mailto:joe.yasi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:36 AM
> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> Cc: Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; 
> Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans 
> Verkuil
> Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the 
> >> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> >> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the 
> >> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from 
> >> > the
> >> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> >>
> >> This was previously requested
> >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> >
> > (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> >
> > Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a 
> > summary of the firmware situation here.
> >
> > Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant 
> > gave us license to re-distribute.
> >
> > According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same 
> > for two different chips. On their words:
> >
> >         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> >
> > The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c, 
> > cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> >
> > $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media 
> > drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> >
> > $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> > #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> > #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> > #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> >
> > Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> > linux-firmware:
> >
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> >
> > And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> >
> > 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw 
> > 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw 
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> >
> > So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are 
> > identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> >
> > Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from 
> > their zip file, we have:
> >
> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> >
> > With different checksums:
> >
> > b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> >
> > So:
> > 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
> >    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
> >    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
> >    it on their driver.
> 
> FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest Hauppauge driver:
> http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the same as the current one in git:
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 
> but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> > 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
> >    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
> >    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
> >    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> >
> 
> >> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> >
> > That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or 
> > Hauppauge could help solving this dilema.
> 
> I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu repositories.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe Yasi
> 
> Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
> 
> "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:17:34 -0800
Sri Deevi <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:

> Mauro,
> 
> Are you asking Hauppauge's version of ROM to be distributed with permissions ? 
> Please clarify. 
> 
> If that is the case, I may not be able to do that. 

I've no idea if Hauppauge customized it, or if they just bundled a Conexant
version of it. I suspect it was the last case, but maybe Michael or Steven
may have or check with someone else about the origin of that firmware
(85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom).

Regards,
Mauro

> 
> Michael,
> 
> If you can give me the details of when was the last time you got updates from Conexant, then I can try to help in this regard.
> 
> Thanks
> Sri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mchehab@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:07 AM
> To: Sri Deevi
> Cc: Joseph Yasi; Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans Verkuil
> Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> 
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:37:07 -0800
> "Sri Deevi" <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:
> 
> > Mauro and All,
> > 
> > Apologies for delay in reply.
> > 
> > Whatever firmware works keep that one as reference. If you guys think the firmware from Hauppauge is latest, please keep that and I can get the required permissions as needed. 
> > 
> > Please do let me know whatever is the plan. Currently, there are no updates to this firmware as I know.
> 
> David merged yesterday at linux-firmware a patch from Ben that removes this firmware from the tree:
> 
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> As this firmware is known to not work with the Hauppauge devices.
> 
> The better would be if you could give us permission to redistribute, instead, the firmware found on Hauppauge's site (Windows driver only version there):
> 	http://www.hauppauge.com/site/support/support_hvr1500.html
> With points to:
> 	http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip
> 
> The firmware there is this one:
> 	-rw-rw-r-- 1 mchehab mchehab 376836 Mar 17  2006 85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
> 	1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
> 
> With matches with the one it is known to work with this hardware:
> 
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> That would fix the main firmware issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sri
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph Yasi [mailto:joe.yasi@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:36 AM
> > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > Cc: Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; 
> > Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans 
> > Verkuil
> > Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> > 
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> > > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the 
> > >> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > >> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the 
> > >> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from 
> > >> > the
> > >> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> > >>
> > >> This was previously requested
> > >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> > >
> > > (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> > >
> > > Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a 
> > > summary of the firmware situation here.
> > >
> > > Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant 
> > > gave us license to re-distribute.
> > >
> > > According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same 
> > > for two different chips. On their words:
> > >
> > >         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> > >
> > > The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c, 
> > > cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> > >
> > > $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media 
> > > drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > > drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > >
> > > $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> > > #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> > > #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> > > #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> > >
> > > Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> > > linux-firmware:
> > >
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> > >
> > > And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> > >
> > > 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw 
> > > 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > > b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > > 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> > >
> > > So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are 
> > > identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> > >
> > > Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > > and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from 
> > > their zip file, we have:
> > >
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > >
> > > With different checksums:
> > >
> > > b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > >
> > > So:
> > > 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
> > >    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
> > >    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
> > >    it on their driver.
> > 
> > FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest Hauppauge driver:
> > http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the same as the current one in git:
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > 
> > but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > 
> > > 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
> > >    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
> > >    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
> > >    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> > >
> > 
> > >> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> > >
> > > That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or 
> > > Hauppauge could help solving this dilema.
> > 
> > I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu repositories.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Joe Yasi
> > 
> > Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
> > 
> > "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 
> > 
> > **********************************************************************
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 
> 


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

RE: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Sri Deevi]

I am also checking with internal resources. Let me see what I can find out about the same.

Thanks
Sri

-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mchehab@redhat.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:21 PM
To: Sri Deevi
Cc: Joseph Yasi; Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans Verkuil; Jay Guillory; Steven Toth
Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

Em Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:17:34 -0800
Sri Deevi <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:

> Mauro,
> 
> Are you asking Hauppauge's version of ROM to be distributed with permissions ? 
> Please clarify. 
> 
> If that is the case, I may not be able to do that. 

I've no idea if Hauppauge customized it, or if they just bundled a Conexant version of it. I suspect it was the last case, but maybe Michael or Steven may have or check with someone else about the origin of that firmware (85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom).

Regards,
Mauro

> 
> Michael,
> 
> If you can give me the details of when was the last time you got updates from Conexant, then I can try to help in this regard.
> 
> Thanks
> Sri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [mailto:mchehab@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:07 AM
> To: Sri Deevi
> Cc: Joseph Yasi; Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David 
> Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans 
> Verkuil
> Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> 
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:37:07 -0800
> "Sri Deevi" <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com> escreveu:
> 
> > Mauro and All,
> > 
> > Apologies for delay in reply.
> > 
> > Whatever firmware works keep that one as reference. If you guys think the firmware from Hauppauge is latest, please keep that and I can get the required permissions as needed. 
> > 
> > Please do let me know whatever is the plan. Currently, there are no updates to this firmware as I know.
> 
> David merged yesterday at linux-firmware a patch from Ben that removes this firmware from the tree:
> 
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> As this firmware is known to not work with the Hauppauge devices.
> 
> The better would be if you could give us permission to redistribute, instead, the firmware found on Hauppauge's site (Windows driver only version there):
> 	http://www.hauppauge.com/site/support/support_hvr1500.html
> With points to:
> 	http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip
> 
> The firmware there is this one:
> 	-rw-rw-r-- 1 mchehab mchehab 376836 Mar 17  2006 85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
> 	1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  85drv_29272/Driver85/hcw85enc.rom
> 
> With matches with the one it is known to work with this hardware:
> 
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> That would fix the main firmware issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sri
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph Yasi [mailto:joe.yasi@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:36 AM
> > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > Cc: Ben Hutchings; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; 
> > Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Andy Walls; Hans 
> > Verkuil
> > Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken
> > 
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000 Ben Hutchings 
> > > <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the 
> > >> > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > >> > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the 
> > >> > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted 
> > >> > from the
> > >> > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> > >>
> > >> This was previously requested
> > >> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> > >
> > > (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> > >
> > > Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a 
> > > summary of the firmware situation here.
> > >
> > > Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that 
> > > Conexant gave us license to re-distribute.
> > >
> > > According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same 
> > > for two different chips. On their words:
> > >
> > >         "The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> > >
> > > The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by 
> > > cx23885-417.c, cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> > >
> > > $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media 
> > > drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > > drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> > >
> > > $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> > > #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> > > #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> > > #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> > >
> > > Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at
> > > linux-firmware:
> > >
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> > >
> > > And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> > >
> > > 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw 
> > > 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> > > b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> > > 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> > >
> > > So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are 
> > > identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> > >
> > > Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw 
> > > and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from 
> > > their zip file, we have:
> > >
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > > -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > >
> > > With different checksums:
> > >
> > > b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw 
> > > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > >
> > > So:
> > > 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
> > >    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
> > >    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
> > >    it on their driver.
> > 
> > FYI, the v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw firmware file from the latest Hauppauge driver:
> > http://hauppauge.lightpath.net/software/drivers/85drv_29272.zip is the same as the current one in git:
> > a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> > 
> > but the v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file is still the same larger 372kB file:
> > 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> > 
> > > 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
> > >    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
> > >    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
> > >    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> > >
> > 
> > >> For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> > >
> > > That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or 
> > > Hauppauge could help solving this dilema.
> > 
> > I agree with removing it from the tree for now. The card doesn't work with the current firmware encoder firmware in tree, and it's annoying to have the working version extracted from the driver overwritten everything a new linux-firmware package is pushed to the Ubuntu repositories.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Joe Yasi
> > 
> > Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following 
> > annotations
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > ********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
> > 
> > "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 
> > 
> > ********************************************************************
> > **
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > 
> 
> 


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

RE: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Sri Deevi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13031 bytes --]

Mauro/Andy/Hans,

I got the latest version of firmware for encoder Cx23416, build release version 120. Is it possible for you guys to verify with your hardware and let me know. If it works, then we can set this as start point or base for any next release. I believe it should work on all versions of encoders series we have.

And also, if you can send me format that our Marketing needs to sign for firmware release/redistribution, please send me that as well. 

I have included our marketing manager Mr.Jay to this list, so he will look into details of providing authorization as needed. 

Hope this helps,
Thanks
Sri

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Walls [mailto:awalls@md.metrocast.net] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 1:38 PM
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Ben Hutchings; Joseph Yasi; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; David Woodhouse; Palash Bandyopadhyay; Sri Deevi; Michael Krufky; Hans Verkuil
Subject: Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

Hi,

Instead of answering points in the email chain, I'm just going to provide the best information I have.

I. Definitions:
- Thresher: broadcast video decoder
- Merlin:   broadcast audio system detection microcontroller and decoder
- Mako:     Thresher + Merlin

- CX2583[67]:   stand-alone Thresher
- CX2584[0123]: stand-alone Mako

- CX23415: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + MPEG Decoder, JHVM
- CX23416: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM
- CX23417: Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder, JHVM

- CX23418: PCI/Microcontroller host MPEG Encoder + Mako, ARM

- CX2388[578]: PCIe host Video capture + Mako
- CX2310[012]: USB host Video capture + Mako

II. Notes about the Mako core:
1. The Merlin in every Mako uses a 16 kB firmware image.  (Technically it is 16382 bytes instead of 16384 bytes, IIRC.)

2. The Merlin implementations appear to vary from one another, but there are at least two distinct groupings based on hardware register
implementation:
   a. Older: CX2584[0123] (v4l-cx25840.fw)
             CX23418      (v4l-cx23418-dig.fw)

   b. Newer: CX2388[578]  (v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw)
             CX231[012]   (v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw)

The firmwares between the two groups are not interchangeable.  For example, IIRC the older Merlin audio firmwares might manipulate video U,V saturation registers on a CX23885.

3. There seem to be a large number of versions of Merlin firmware files, upon examining Windows driver CD I have.  It is very possible that two different Merlin firmware files, with different MD5 sums, are both intended to work on the same chip, e.g. CX23885.

4. There appears to be no way to tell what chip for which a Merlin firmware file is intended, without disassembling the Merlin firmware file and painfully examining the assembly code.  A violation of most, if not all, of the license agreements.

5. With the exception of the CX23418 chip and cx18 driver, all Mako/Merlin stuff in Linux is handled by the cx25840 driver.  The cx18 driver has its own fork of cx25840-*.c in cx18-av-*.c


III. Notes on the MPEG Encoders:
1. The MPEG encoder firmware images are never 16 kB; they are around 10 times larger than that, or larger.

2. The CX2341[56] chips both use the same MPEG encoder firmware image.
(v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw)

3. It is very plausible that the CX23417 can use the same MPEG Encoder firmware image as a CX23416, I just don't know for sure.

4. The CX23418 MPEG encoder firmware images (v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw,
v4l-cx23418-apu.fw) and distinct from the firmware for the CX2341[567] chips, as the underlying embedded processor has a different machine architecture and instruction set.


IV. Known good firmware images

1. CX23418 MPEG encoder and CX23418 Merlin/Mako:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/cx18-firmware.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)
e8188c7542a82a8d7cdc2720ddfb3a3e CX23418 Firmware Video Firmware Release
Notes.pdf
6686a1673585585f5017c13ada343f98 LICENSE
588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw

Last I checked months ago, the CX23418 APU, CPU, and Merlin firmware
images all matched linuxtv.org's copies.

This CX23418 Merlin image does not match the CX23418 Merlin image that
Hauppauge is shipping with the HVR-1600 driver CD:
c529278bbceb51d68d3fc1993657c901  hcw18mlC.rom

So I now have doubts as to whether the CX23418 Merlin firmware file
being used under Linux is correct. :(


2. CX2341[56] MPEG decoder/encoder, CX2584[0123] Merlin, and PVRUSB
microcontroller
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20070217.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

(The licenses in these files appear to be OK if the firmware is used
with Hauppauge products.  For any other use, consult your legal
council.)

The above archives are identical, except for the v4l-cx25840.fw Merlin
firmware file.

The 2007 archive has the "original" CX2584[0123] Merlin firmware,

The 2008 archive has the CX23418 Merlin firmware (which might be a bad
thing). I think the CX23418 Merlin firmware actually causes the
user-reported ivtv "tinny-audio" problem, when used with the
CX2584[0123] chips.

Please note: The ivtv driver was coded to a very specific version of the
v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw image, due the ivtv driver's use of firmware specific
memory locations to work around some chip and firmware bugs.  No other
version of this firmware image is recommended for the ivtv driver.


3. CX2388[578] MPEG encoder (aka. CX23417) firmware
Aside from Conextant, I don't know where to get a redistributable copy,
specifically intended for the CX23417.
The v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw file for the CX23416 might work, after being
renamed:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/ivtv-firmware-20080701.tar.gz
(Save as... adding an extra .gz at the end, since the webserver double
gzips the file.)

4. CX2388[578] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.

5. CX2310[012] Merlin firmware
Aside from Conexant, I don't know where to get a copy for
redistribution.


Regards,
Andy

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 09:22 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:16:35 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escreveu:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 19:30 -0500, Joseph Yasi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure the appropriate list to email for this, but the
> > > v4l-cx23885-enc.fw file in the linux-firmware.git tree is incorrect.
> > > It is the wrong size and just a duplicate of the
> > > v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. The correct file can be extracted from the
> > > HVR1800 drivers here: http://steventoth.net/linux/hvr1800/.
> > 
> > This was previously requested
> > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/57816> but unfortunately it's not clear that it would be legal to redistribute firmware extracted from that driver (or the driver itself).
> 
> (c/c Conexant developers, Andy and Hans)
> 
> Let's see if we can once for all fix this issue. So, let me do a summary
> of the firmware situation here.
> 
> Basically, the firmwares at linux-kernel are the ones that Conexant
> gave us license to re-distribute.
> 
> According with Conexant, there's one firmware that it is the same
> for two different chips. On their words:
> 
> 	"The Merlin firmware are the same for 418 and 416/7."
> 
> The envolved Conexant firmwares are the ones used by cx23885-417.c,
> cx231xx-417.c and cx25850.c:
> 
> $ git grep v4l-cx23885-enc.fw drivers/media
> drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-417.c:#define CX23885_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:#define CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_NAME "v4l-cx23885-enc.fw"
> 
> $ grep "define.*FIRM" drivers/media/i2c/cx25840/cx25840-firmware.c
> #define CX2388x_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX231xx_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw"
> #define CX25840_FIRMWARE "v4l-cx25840.fw"
> 
> Those are the Conexant firmware files that we currently have at 
> linux-firmware:
> 
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 141200 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l 158332 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 v4l v4l  16382 Ago 10  2012 v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> And those are their corresponding md5sum:
> 
> 7d3bb956dc9df0eafded2b56ba57cc42  v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw
> 588f081b562f5c653a3db1ad8f65939a  v4l-cx23418-apu.fw
> b6c7ed64bc44b1a6e0840adaeac39d79  v4l-cx23418-cpu.fw
> 95bc688d3e7599fd5800161e9971cc55  v4l-cx23418-dig.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> a9f8f5d901a7fb42f552e1ee6384f3bb  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> dadb79e9904fc8af96e8111d9cb59320  v4l-cx25840.fw
> 
> So, yes, v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw and v4l-cx23885-enc.fw files are
> identical on the official released firmwares, and both have 16K.
> 
> Now, Hauppauge is using different firmwares for v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> and v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw. After extracting the firmware from their
> zip file, we have:
> 
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l  376836 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> -r--r--r--   1 v4l v4l   16382 Fev 24 08:47 v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 
> With different checksums:
> 
> b3704908fd058485f3ef136941b2e513  v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw
> 1cb3c48a6684126f5e503a434f2d636b  v4l-cx23885-enc.fw
> 
> So:
> 1) With regards to the encoder firmware for cx23885-417, both Conexant and
>    Hauppauge, provided a firmware with 16KB. Although they're different.
>    Not sure if they are just different versions, or if Hauppauge customized
>    it on their driver.
> 
> 2) With regards to the decoder firmware for cx25840 (actually, the
>    equivalent IP block inside cx23885), while Conexant provided us with
>    a 16KB firmware, and both decoder and encoder using the very same
>    firmware, Hauppauge's driver is shipped with a 372KB firmware.
> 
> What's more intriguing is that the firmware size is so different
> between those two versions. Also, having the encoder and the 
> decoder using the same firmware looks weird.
> 
> In any case, it is clear, from the reports, that the cx25840 driver
> doesn't work with the 16KB v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware provided by
> Conexant.
> 
> It should also be noticed that the other firmwares used by cx25840 driver
> also has only 16 KB.
> 
> So, I can see two possible situations here:
> 
> 1) Conexant shipped us a wrong v4l-cx23885-enc.fw;
> 
> 2) Hauppauge uses a completely different version for it, perhaps
> developed by them, and the driver was written to take that special
> version into account. So, the driver is not currently prepared to
> use the Conexant firmware for cx23885.
> 
> As I didn't work on the development of this driver, nor I worked with
> HVR1800 development, I can't tell what of the above is the case.
> 
> There are two possible solutions to solve the issue it:
> 
> 1) Conexant could help us to make the cx23885 driver to work with
>    their firmware, or release us the right firmware, (if this was simply a
>    mistake when they sent us the firmwares). The driver could be smart
>    enough to work with either firmware (it should be easy to distinguish
>    between them, due to the huge difference on its size);
> 
> 2) Hauppauge should re-license their v4l-cx23885-enc.fw firmware to
>    allow it to be shipped together with linux-firmware;
> 
> > For now, I think we should delete the current version.
> 
> That seems to be the only approach left, if neither Conexant or Hauppauge
> could help solving this dilema.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** 

"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you." 

********************************************************************** 

---------------------------------------------------------------------


[-- Attachment #2: Cx416Enc_Build_Release_V120.rar --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 49410 bytes --]

Re: Firmware for cx23885 in linux-firmware.git is broken

[Hans Verkuil]

On Tue February 26 2013 19:57:45 Sri Deevi wrote:
> Mauro/Andy/Hans,
> 
> I got the latest version of firmware for encoder Cx23416, build release version 120. Is it possible for you guys to verify with your hardware and let me know. If it works, then we can set this as start point or base for any next release. I believe it should work on all versions of encoders series we have.

I gave it a quick spin on my pvr350 and it looked OK, but if you have some
background information regarding what was changed since the previous version,
then I can do a few more specific tests.

Regards,

	Hans