All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries
@ 2022-02-02  8:21 Prasad Malisetty
  2022-02-03 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
  2022-02-03 21:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Prasad Malisetty @ 2022-02-02  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: agross, bjorn.andersson, lorenzo.pieralisi, devicetree,
	linux-kernel, robh, kw, bhelgaas, linux-pci, linux-arm-msm
  Cc: quic_vbadigan, quic_ramkri, manivannan.sadhasivam, swboyd,
	Prasad Malisetty

Current gpio's in IDP file are not mapping properly,
seeing device timedout failures.

Corrected pcie gpio entries in dtsi files.

Fixes: 4e24d227aa77 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe nodes for IDP board")

Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty <quic_pmaliset@quicinc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 10 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 78da9ac..84bf9d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -243,9 +243,6 @@
 	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
 
 	vddpe-3v3-supply = <&nvme_3v3_regulator>;
-
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
 };
 
 &pcie1_phy {
@@ -360,6 +357,21 @@
 
 /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7280.dtsi */
 
+&pcie1_reset_n {
+	pins = "gpio2";
+
+	drive-strength = <16>;
+	output-low;
+	bias-disable;
+};
+
+&pcie1_wake_n {
+	pins = "gpio3";
+
+	drive-strength = <2>;
+	bias-pull-up;
+};
+
 &pm7325_gpios {
 	key_vol_up_default: key-vol-up-default {
 		pins = "gpio6";
@@ -436,23 +448,6 @@
 		function = "gpio";
 	};
 
-	pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {
-		pins = "gpio2";
-		function = "gpio";
-
-		drive-strength = <16>;
-		output-low;
-		bias-disable;
-	};
-
-	pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
-		pins = "gpio3";
-		function = "gpio";
-
-		drive-strength = <2>;
-		bias-pull-up;
-	};
-
 	qup_uart7_sleep_cts: qup-uart7-sleep-cts {
 		pins = "gpio28";
 		function = "gpio";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index d4009cc..2e14c37 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@
 			phy-names = "pciephy";
 
 			pinctrl-names = "default";
-			pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>;
+			pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>, <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
 
 			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1c80 0x1>;
 
@@ -3272,6 +3272,14 @@
 				bias-pull-up;
 			};
 
+			pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {
+				function = "gpio";
+			};
+
+			pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
+				function = "gpio";
+			};
+
 			dp_hot_plug_det: dp-hot-plug-det {
 				pins = "gpio47";
 				function = "dp_hot";
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries
  2022-02-02  8:21 [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries Prasad Malisetty
@ 2022-02-03 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
  2022-02-03 21:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2022-02-03 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prasad Malisetty, agross, bhelgaas, bjorn.andersson, devicetree,
	kw, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-pci, lorenzo.pieralisi,
	robh
  Cc: quic_vbadigan, quic_ramkri, manivannan.sadhasivam, dianders

Quoting Prasad Malisetty (2022-02-02 00:21:22)
> Current gpio's in IDP file are not mapping properly,
> seeing device timedout failures.

What's the problem exactly?

>
> Corrected pcie gpio entries in dtsi files.
>
> Fixes: 4e24d227aa77 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe nodes for IDP board")
>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty <quic_pmaliset@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 10 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> index 78da9ac..84bf9d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> @@ -243,9 +243,6 @@
>         perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
>         vddpe-3v3-supply = <&nvme_3v3_regulator>;
> -
> -       pinctrl-names = "default";
> -       pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
>  };
>
>  &pcie1_phy {
> @@ -360,6 +357,21 @@
>
>  /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7280.dtsi */
>
> +&pcie1_reset_n {
> +       pins = "gpio2";
> +
> +       drive-strength = <16>;

Is drive-strength of 16 actually necessary?

> +       output-low;
> +       bias-disable;
> +};
> +
> +&pcie1_wake_n {
> +       pins = "gpio3";
> +
> +       drive-strength = <2>;
> +       bias-pull-up;
> +};
> +
>  &pm7325_gpios {
>         key_vol_up_default: key-vol-up-default {
>                 pins = "gpio6";
> @@ -436,23 +448,6 @@
>                 function = "gpio";
>         };
>
> -       pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {
> -               pins = "gpio2";
> -               function = "gpio";
> -
> -               drive-strength = <16>;
> -               output-low;
> -               bias-disable;
> -       };
> -
> -       pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
> -               pins = "gpio3";
> -               function = "gpio";
> -
> -               drive-strength = <2>;
> -               bias-pull-up;
> -       };
> -
>         qup_uart7_sleep_cts: qup-uart7-sleep-cts {
>                 pins = "gpio28";
>                 function = "gpio";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index d4009cc..2e14c37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@
>                         phy-names = "pciephy";
>
>                         pinctrl-names = "default";
> -                       pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>;
> +                       pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>, <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
>
>                         iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1c80 0x1>;
>
> @@ -3272,6 +3272,14 @@
>                                 bias-pull-up;
>                         };
>
> +                       pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {
> +                               function = "gpio";
> +                       };
> +
> +                       pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
> +                               function = "gpio";
> +                       };
> +
>                         dp_hot_plug_det: dp-hot-plug-det {
>                                 pins = "gpio47";
>                                 function = "dp_hot";
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries
  2022-02-02  8:21 [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries Prasad Malisetty
  2022-02-03 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2022-02-03 21:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2022-02-03 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prasad Malisetty
  Cc: agross, lorenzo.pieralisi, devicetree, linux-kernel, robh, kw,
	bhelgaas, linux-pci, linux-arm-msm, quic_vbadigan, quic_ramkri,
	manivannan.sadhasivam, swboyd

On Wed 02 Feb 00:21 PST 2022, Prasad Malisetty wrote:

> Current gpio's in IDP file are not mapping properly,
> seeing device timedout failures.
> 

It's not obvious from the proposed patch which part fixes this and which
part relates to moving part of the nodes between dtsi and dts.

> Corrected pcie gpio entries in dtsi files.
> 
> Fixes: 4e24d227aa77 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe nodes for IDP board")
> 

There's not supposed to be a blank line here.

> Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty <quic_pmaliset@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 10 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> index 78da9ac..84bf9d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> @@ -243,9 +243,6 @@
>  	perst-gpio = <&tlmm 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>  
>  	vddpe-3v3-supply = <&nvme_3v3_regulator>;
> -
> -	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
>  };
>  
>  &pcie1_phy {
> @@ -360,6 +357,21 @@
>  
>  /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7280.dtsi */
>  
> +&pcie1_reset_n {
> +	pins = "gpio2";
> +
> +	drive-strength = <16>;
> +	output-low;
> +	bias-disable;
> +};
> +
> +&pcie1_wake_n {
> +	pins = "gpio3";
> +
> +	drive-strength = <2>;
> +	bias-pull-up;
> +};
> +
>  &pm7325_gpios {
>  	key_vol_up_default: key-vol-up-default {
>  		pins = "gpio6";
> @@ -436,23 +448,6 @@
>  		function = "gpio";
>  	};
>  
> -	pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {
> -		pins = "gpio2";
> -		function = "gpio";
> -
> -		drive-strength = <16>;
> -		output-low;
> -		bias-disable;
> -	};
> -
> -	pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
> -		pins = "gpio3";
> -		function = "gpio";
> -
> -		drive-strength = <2>;
> -		bias-pull-up;
> -	};
> -
>  	qup_uart7_sleep_cts: qup-uart7-sleep-cts {
>  		pins = "gpio28";
>  		function = "gpio";
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index d4009cc..2e14c37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@
>  			phy-names = "pciephy";
>  
>  			pinctrl-names = "default";
> -			pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>;
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_clkreq_n>, <&pcie1_reset_n>, <&pcie1_wake_n>;
>  
>  			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1c80 0x1>;
>  
> @@ -3272,6 +3272,14 @@
>  				bias-pull-up;
>  			};
>  
> +			pcie1_reset_n: pcie1-reset-n {

I find the idea of partially describing the state in two files hard to
follow - in particular you need to read both parts of &pcie1_reset_n to
understand what the state this represents.

Keep it as it was, and fix the problem you're seeing, without the
refactoring.

Regards,
Bjorn

> +				function = "gpio";
> +			};
> +
> +			pcie1_wake_n: pcie1-wake-n {
> +				function = "gpio";
> +			};
> +
>  			dp_hot_plug_det: dp-hot-plug-det {
>  				pins = "gpio47";
>  				function = "dp_hot";
> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-03 21:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-02  8:21 [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix pcie gpio entries Prasad Malisetty
2022-02-03 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-02-03 21:25 ` Bjorn Andersson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.