All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 25/32] iommu/mtk: Migrate to aggregate driver
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53FAHDmCznJ35Xh2aTwXBVwukAM3ioKx8SU9VowSaQSqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff81bc1fe1f1c2060fcf03ba14f1bef584c47599.camel@mediatek.com>

Quoting Yong Wu (2022-01-12 01:09:19)
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:27 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
> > index 64ad7478c67a..97f253a41bdf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/component.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
> > @@ -492,15 +492,30 @@ static struct aggregate_device
> > *__aggregate_find(struct device *parent)
> >       return dev ? to_aggregate_device(dev) : NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aggregate_mutex);
> > +
> >  static int aggregate_driver_register(struct aggregate_driver *adrv)
> >  {
> > -     adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > -     return driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&aggregate_mutex);
> > +     if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&adrv->count)) {
> > +             adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > +             ret = driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     refcount_inc(&adrv->count);
>
> This should be refcount_set(&adrv->count, 1)?
>
> Otherwise, it will warning like this:

Yeah I'll fix it, thanks.

>
> [    2.654526] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    2.655558] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>
> After this patch, the aggregate_driver flow looks ok. But our driver
> still aborts like this:
>
> [    2.721316] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 0000000000000000
> ...
> [    2.731658] pc : mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.732434] lr : mtk_smi_larb_resume+0x54/0x98
> ...
> [    2.742457] Call trace:
> [    2.742768]  mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.743496]  pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x48
> [    2.744090]  __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0xa8
> [    2.744648]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x94/0x2c8
> [    2.745191]  __rpm_callback+0x44/0x150
> [    2.745669]  rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
> [    2.746114]  rpm_resume+0x314/0x558
> [    2.746559]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x88
> [    2.747080]  pm_runtime_get_suppliers+0x7c/0x110
> [    2.747668]  __driver_probe_device+0x4c/0xe8
> [    2.748212]  driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130
> [    2.748745]  __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xd0
> [    2.749300]  bus_for_each_drv+0x68/0xd0
> [    2.749787]  __device_attach+0xec/0x148
> [    2.750277]  device_attach+0x14/0x20
> [    2.750733]  bus_rescan_devices_helper+0x50/0x90
> [    2.751319]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd8
> [    2.751806]  bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x30
> [    2.752315]  __component_add+0x7c/0xa0
> [    2.752795]  component_add+0x14/0x20
> [    2.753253]  mtk_smi_larb_probe+0xe0/0x120
>
> This is because the device runtime_resume is called before the bind
> operation(In our case this detailed function is mtk_smi_larb_bind).
> The issue doesn't happen without this patchset. I'm not sure the right
> sequence. If we should fix in mediatek driver, the patch could be:

Oh, the runtime PM is moved around with these patches. The aggregate
device is runtime PM enabled before the probe is called, and there are
supplier links made to each component, so each component is runtime
resumed before the aggregate probe function is called. It means that all
the component drivers need to have their resources ready to power on
before their component_bind() callback is made. Thinking more about it
that may be wrong if something from the aggregate device is needed to
fully power on the component. Is that what is happening here?

>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..288841555067 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> -       larb_gen->config_port(dev);
> +       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb after it binds
> with iommu */
> +       if (larb->mmu)
> +               larb_gen->config_port(dev);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>
> Another nitpick, the title should be: iommu/mediatek: xxxx
>

Fixed it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 25/32] iommu/mtk: Migrate to aggregate driver
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53FAHDmCznJ35Xh2aTwXBVwukAM3ioKx8SU9VowSaQSqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff81bc1fe1f1c2060fcf03ba14f1bef584c47599.camel@mediatek.com>

Quoting Yong Wu (2022-01-12 01:09:19)
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:27 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
> > index 64ad7478c67a..97f253a41bdf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/component.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
> > @@ -492,15 +492,30 @@ static struct aggregate_device
> > *__aggregate_find(struct device *parent)
> >       return dev ? to_aggregate_device(dev) : NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aggregate_mutex);
> > +
> >  static int aggregate_driver_register(struct aggregate_driver *adrv)
> >  {
> > -     adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > -     return driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&aggregate_mutex);
> > +     if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&adrv->count)) {
> > +             adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > +             ret = driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     refcount_inc(&adrv->count);
>
> This should be refcount_set(&adrv->count, 1)?
>
> Otherwise, it will warning like this:

Yeah I'll fix it, thanks.

>
> [    2.654526] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    2.655558] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>
> After this patch, the aggregate_driver flow looks ok. But our driver
> still aborts like this:
>
> [    2.721316] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 0000000000000000
> ...
> [    2.731658] pc : mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.732434] lr : mtk_smi_larb_resume+0x54/0x98
> ...
> [    2.742457] Call trace:
> [    2.742768]  mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.743496]  pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x48
> [    2.744090]  __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0xa8
> [    2.744648]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x94/0x2c8
> [    2.745191]  __rpm_callback+0x44/0x150
> [    2.745669]  rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
> [    2.746114]  rpm_resume+0x314/0x558
> [    2.746559]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x88
> [    2.747080]  pm_runtime_get_suppliers+0x7c/0x110
> [    2.747668]  __driver_probe_device+0x4c/0xe8
> [    2.748212]  driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130
> [    2.748745]  __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xd0
> [    2.749300]  bus_for_each_drv+0x68/0xd0
> [    2.749787]  __device_attach+0xec/0x148
> [    2.750277]  device_attach+0x14/0x20
> [    2.750733]  bus_rescan_devices_helper+0x50/0x90
> [    2.751319]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd8
> [    2.751806]  bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x30
> [    2.752315]  __component_add+0x7c/0xa0
> [    2.752795]  component_add+0x14/0x20
> [    2.753253]  mtk_smi_larb_probe+0xe0/0x120
>
> This is because the device runtime_resume is called before the bind
> operation(In our case this detailed function is mtk_smi_larb_bind).
> The issue doesn't happen without this patchset. I'm not sure the right
> sequence. If we should fix in mediatek driver, the patch could be:

Oh, the runtime PM is moved around with these patches. The aggregate
device is runtime PM enabled before the probe is called, and there are
supplier links made to each component, so each component is runtime
resumed before the aggregate probe function is called. It means that all
the component drivers need to have their resources ready to power on
before their component_bind() callback is made. Thinking more about it
that may be wrong if something from the aggregate device is needed to
fully power on the component. Is that what is happening here?

>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..288841555067 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> -       larb_gen->config_port(dev);
> +       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb after it binds
> with iommu */
> +       if (larb->mmu)
> +               larb_gen->config_port(dev);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>
> Another nitpick, the title should be: iommu/mediatek: xxxx
>

Fixed it.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 25/32] iommu/mtk: Migrate to aggregate driver
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53FAHDmCznJ35Xh2aTwXBVwukAM3ioKx8SU9VowSaQSqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff81bc1fe1f1c2060fcf03ba14f1bef584c47599.camel@mediatek.com>

Quoting Yong Wu (2022-01-12 01:09:19)
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:27 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
> > index 64ad7478c67a..97f253a41bdf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/component.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
> > @@ -492,15 +492,30 @@ static struct aggregate_device
> > *__aggregate_find(struct device *parent)
> >       return dev ? to_aggregate_device(dev) : NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aggregate_mutex);
> > +
> >  static int aggregate_driver_register(struct aggregate_driver *adrv)
> >  {
> > -     adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > -     return driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&aggregate_mutex);
> > +     if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&adrv->count)) {
> > +             adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > +             ret = driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     refcount_inc(&adrv->count);
>
> This should be refcount_set(&adrv->count, 1)?
>
> Otherwise, it will warning like this:

Yeah I'll fix it, thanks.

>
> [    2.654526] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    2.655558] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>
> After this patch, the aggregate_driver flow looks ok. But our driver
> still aborts like this:
>
> [    2.721316] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 0000000000000000
> ...
> [    2.731658] pc : mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.732434] lr : mtk_smi_larb_resume+0x54/0x98
> ...
> [    2.742457] Call trace:
> [    2.742768]  mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.743496]  pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x48
> [    2.744090]  __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0xa8
> [    2.744648]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x94/0x2c8
> [    2.745191]  __rpm_callback+0x44/0x150
> [    2.745669]  rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
> [    2.746114]  rpm_resume+0x314/0x558
> [    2.746559]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x88
> [    2.747080]  pm_runtime_get_suppliers+0x7c/0x110
> [    2.747668]  __driver_probe_device+0x4c/0xe8
> [    2.748212]  driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130
> [    2.748745]  __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xd0
> [    2.749300]  bus_for_each_drv+0x68/0xd0
> [    2.749787]  __device_attach+0xec/0x148
> [    2.750277]  device_attach+0x14/0x20
> [    2.750733]  bus_rescan_devices_helper+0x50/0x90
> [    2.751319]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd8
> [    2.751806]  bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x30
> [    2.752315]  __component_add+0x7c/0xa0
> [    2.752795]  component_add+0x14/0x20
> [    2.753253]  mtk_smi_larb_probe+0xe0/0x120
>
> This is because the device runtime_resume is called before the bind
> operation(In our case this detailed function is mtk_smi_larb_bind).
> The issue doesn't happen without this patchset. I'm not sure the right
> sequence. If we should fix in mediatek driver, the patch could be:

Oh, the runtime PM is moved around with these patches. The aggregate
device is runtime PM enabled before the probe is called, and there are
supplier links made to each component, so each component is runtime
resumed before the aggregate probe function is called. It means that all
the component drivers need to have their resources ready to power on
before their component_bind() callback is made. Thinking more about it
that may be wrong if something from the aggregate device is needed to
fully power on the component. Is that what is happening here?

>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..288841555067 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> -       larb_gen->config_port(dev);
> +       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb after it binds
> with iommu */
> +       if (larb->mmu)
> +               larb_gen->config_port(dev);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>
> Another nitpick, the title should be: iommu/mediatek: xxxx
>

Fixed it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,  Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	 Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	 iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 25/32] iommu/mtk: Migrate to aggregate driver
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53FAHDmCznJ35Xh2aTwXBVwukAM3ioKx8SU9VowSaQSqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff81bc1fe1f1c2060fcf03ba14f1bef584c47599.camel@mediatek.com>

Quoting Yong Wu (2022-01-12 01:09:19)
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:27 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
> > index 64ad7478c67a..97f253a41bdf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/component.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
> > @@ -492,15 +492,30 @@ static struct aggregate_device
> > *__aggregate_find(struct device *parent)
> >       return dev ? to_aggregate_device(dev) : NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aggregate_mutex);
> > +
> >  static int aggregate_driver_register(struct aggregate_driver *adrv)
> >  {
> > -     adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > -     return driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&aggregate_mutex);
> > +     if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&adrv->count)) {
> > +             adrv->driver.bus = &aggregate_bus_type;
> > +             ret = driver_register(&adrv->driver);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     refcount_inc(&adrv->count);
>
> This should be refcount_set(&adrv->count, 1)?
>
> Otherwise, it will warning like this:

Yeah I'll fix it, thanks.

>
> [    2.654526] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    2.655558] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>
> After this patch, the aggregate_driver flow looks ok. But our driver
> still aborts like this:
>
> [    2.721316] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 0000000000000000
> ...
> [    2.731658] pc : mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.732434] lr : mtk_smi_larb_resume+0x54/0x98
> ...
> [    2.742457] Call trace:
> [    2.742768]  mtk_smi_larb_config_port_gen2_general+0xa4/0x138
> [    2.743496]  pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x48
> [    2.744090]  __genpd_runtime_resume+0x30/0xa8
> [    2.744648]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x94/0x2c8
> [    2.745191]  __rpm_callback+0x44/0x150
> [    2.745669]  rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
> [    2.746114]  rpm_resume+0x314/0x558
> [    2.746559]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x3c/0x88
> [    2.747080]  pm_runtime_get_suppliers+0x7c/0x110
> [    2.747668]  __driver_probe_device+0x4c/0xe8
> [    2.748212]  driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130
> [    2.748745]  __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xd0
> [    2.749300]  bus_for_each_drv+0x68/0xd0
> [    2.749787]  __device_attach+0xec/0x148
> [    2.750277]  device_attach+0x14/0x20
> [    2.750733]  bus_rescan_devices_helper+0x50/0x90
> [    2.751319]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd8
> [    2.751806]  bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x30
> [    2.752315]  __component_add+0x7c/0xa0
> [    2.752795]  component_add+0x14/0x20
> [    2.753253]  mtk_smi_larb_probe+0xe0/0x120
>
> This is because the device runtime_resume is called before the bind
> operation(In our case this detailed function is mtk_smi_larb_bind).
> The issue doesn't happen without this patchset. I'm not sure the right
> sequence. If we should fix in mediatek driver, the patch could be:

Oh, the runtime PM is moved around with these patches. The aggregate
device is runtime PM enabled before the probe is called, and there are
supplier links made to each component, so each component is runtime
resumed before the aggregate probe function is called. It means that all
the component drivers need to have their resources ready to power on
before their component_bind() callback is made. Thinking more about it
that may be wrong if something from the aggregate device is needed to
fully power on the component. Is that what is happening here?

>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..288841555067 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> -       larb_gen->config_port(dev);
> +       /* Configure the basic setting for this larb after it binds
> with iommu */
> +       if (larb->mmu)
> +               larb_gen->config_port(dev);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>
> Another nitpick, the title should be: iommu/mediatek: xxxx
>

Fixed it.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06 21:45 [PATCH v5 00/32] component: Make into an aggregate bus Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/32] component: Replace most references to 'master' with 'aggregate device' Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/32] component: Introduce the aggregate bus_type Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/32] component: Move struct aggregate_device out to header file Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-07 13:07   ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-07 20:12     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-10 11:23       ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/32] component: Add {bind, unbind}_component() ops that take aggregate device Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` [PATCH v5 04/32] component: Add {bind,unbind}_component() " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 05/32] drm/of: Add a drm_of_aggregate_probe() API Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/32] drm/msm: Migrate to aggregate driver Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/32] drm/komeda: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/32] drm/arm/hdlcd: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/32] drm/malidp: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/32] drm/armada: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/32] drm/etnaviv: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/32] drm/kirin: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/32] drm/exynos: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/32] drm/imx: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/32] drm/ingenic: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 16/32] drm/mcde: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 17/32] drm/mediatek: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 18/32] drm/meson: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 19/32] drm/omap: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 20/32] drm/rockchip: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 21/32] drm/sti: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 22/32] drm/sun4i: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 23/32] drm/tilcdc: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 24/32] drm/vc4: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 25/32] iommu/mtk: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-11 12:22   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-11 12:22     ` Yong Wu
2022-01-11 12:22     ` Yong Wu
2022-01-12  0:27     ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-12  0:27       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-12  0:27       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-12  9:09       ` Yong Wu
2022-01-12  9:09         ` Yong Wu
2022-01-12  9:09         ` Yong Wu
2022-01-12  9:09         ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13  4:25         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2022-01-13  4:25           ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-13  4:25           ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-13  4:25           ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-14  9:06           ` Yong Wu
2022-01-14  9:06             ` Yong Wu
2022-01-14  9:06             ` Yong Wu
2022-01-14  9:06             ` Yong Wu
2022-01-14 21:30             ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-14 21:30               ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-14 21:30               ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-14 21:30               ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-15  7:39               ` Yong Wu
2022-01-15  7:39                 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-15  7:39                 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-15  7:39                 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-15  7:50                 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-15  7:50                   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-15  7:50                   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-15  7:50                   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 26/32] mei: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 27/32] power: supply: ab8500: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 28/32] fbdev: omap2: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 29/32] sound: hdac: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 30/32] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: " Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 31/32] component: Get rid of drm_of_component_probe() Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45 ` [PATCH v5 32/32] component: Remove component_master_ops and friends Stephen Boyd
2022-01-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAE-0n53FAHDmCznJ35Xh2aTwXBVwukAM3ioKx8SU9VowSaQSqA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.