All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take extra resource pointer
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:36:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUNZ9xShfCHFvKobOJQ4zBfOrq_s=uYQAcR+YguigNjrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWw0pUB=1iDrX_1qyMFAUGQidSaV7CPc0aNb2CzPB-fZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
> Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address.

Thanks for putting those patches in pci/resource branch.

I just re post updated for second patch.

[v12.update2,02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/633399/

And the [v12 01/15] is not needed anymore.

patch3 to patch15 should still can be applied to pci/resource without problem.

Thanks

Yinghai

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-cris-kernel@axis.com,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take extra resource pointer
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:36:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUNZ9xShfCHFvKobOJQ4zBfOrq_s=uYQAcR+YguigNjrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWw0pUB=1iDrX_1qyMFAUGQidSaV7CPc0aNb2CzPB-fZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
> Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address.

Thanks for putting those patches in pci/resource branch.

I just re post updated for second patch.

[v12.update2,02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/633399/

And the [v12 01/15] is not needed anymore.

patch3 to patch15 should still can be applied to pci/resource without problem.

Thanks

Yinghai

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-cris-kernel@axis.com,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take extra resource pointer
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:36:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUNZ9xShfCHFvKobOJQ4zBfOrq_s=uYQAcR+YguigNjrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWw0pUB=1iDrX_1qyMFAUGQidSaV7CPc0aNb2CzPB-fZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
> Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address.

Thanks for putting those patches in pci/resource branch.

I just re post updated for second patch.

[v12.update2,02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/633399/

And the [v12 01/15] is not needed anymore.

patch3 to patch15 should still can be applied to pci/resource without problem.

Thanks

Yinghai

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yinghai@kernel.org (Yinghai Lu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 01/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take extra resource pointer
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:36:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUNZ9xShfCHFvKobOJQ4zBfOrq_s=uYQAcR+YguigNjrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWw0pUB=1iDrX_1qyMFAUGQidSaV7CPc0aNb2CzPB-fZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
> Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address.

Thanks for putting those patches in pci/resource branch.

I just re post updated for second patch.

[v12.update2,02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/633399/

And the [v12 01/15] is not needed anymore.

patch3 to patch15 should still can be applied to pci/resource without problem.

Thanks

Yinghai

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-09 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-04  0:06 [PATCH v12 00/15] PCI: Fixup for 64bit resource with sparc Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take extra resource pointer Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-07  8:04   ` Jesper Nilsson
2016-06-07  8:04     ` Jesper Nilsson
2016-06-07  8:04     ` Jesper Nilsson
2016-06-08 21:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 21:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 21:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 21:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 22:35     ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-08 22:35       ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-08 22:35       ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-08 22:35       ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09  0:00       ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09  0:00         ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09  0:00         ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09  0:00         ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09 22:36         ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2016-06-09 22:36           ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09 22:36           ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-09 22:36           ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] sparc/PCI: Use correct offset for bus address to resource Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] PCI: Add pci_find_bus_resource() Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] sparc/PCI: Reserve legacy mmio after PCI mmio Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] sparc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in OF parsing Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] powerpc/PCI: " Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] powerpc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in OF parsing Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] OF/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of PCIe device Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] PCI: Only treat non-pref mmio64 as pref if all bridges have MEM_64 Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] PCI: Add has_mem64 for struct host_bridge Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] PCI: Only treat non-pref mmio64 as pref if host bridge has mmio64 Yinghai Lu
2016-06-04  0:06 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] PCI: Restore pref MMIO allocation logic for host bridge without mmio64 Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE9FiQUNZ9xShfCHFvKobOJQ4zBfOrq_s=uYQAcR+YguigNjrQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.