Re: [PATCH] ACPI, PCI: Get PRT entry during acpi_pci_enable_irq()

[Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 11:11 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Peter Hurley found "irq 18 nobody cared" with pci-next, and dmesg has
>>
>> [    8.983246] pci 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
>> [    8.983600] snd_ctxfi 0000:09:02.0: PCI INT A: no GSI - using ISA IRQ 5
>>
>> bisect to
>> | commit 4f535093cf8f6da8cfda7c36c2c1ecd2e9586ee4
>> |     PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible
>>
>> It turns out we need to call acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() after the pci bridges
>> are scanned.
>>
>> Bjorn said:
>>  The bus number binding means acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() has to happen
>>  after enumerating everything below a bridge, and it will prevent us
>>  from doing any bus number reassignment for hotplug.
>>
>>  I think we should remove the bus numbers from the cached _PRT (or
>>  maybe even remove the _PRT caching completely).  When we enable a PCI
>>  device's IRQ, we should search up the PCI device tree looking for a
>>  _PRT associated with each node, and applying normal PCI bridge
>>  swizzling when we don't find a _PRT.  I think this can be done without
>>  using PCI bus numbers at all.
>>
>> So here we try to remove _PRT caching completely.
>>
>> -v2: check !handle early.
>>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
>
> Actually true now :)
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>

Thanks.

> PS - I just happened to see this version on the list. Would you please
> cc me on any future versions?

oh, my fault. I take it for granted that "git send-email" will pick
that email from
patch just like Cc.

Yinghai