All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array.
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 05:50:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV7Va8iAESoXsPCFJo8-jeA=-7SW2b9BmKnUrVonLV1=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725022543.GR3421@sgi.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
>>
>> How about holes that is not in memblock.reserved?
>>
>> before this patch:
>> free_area_init_node/free_area_init_core/memmap_init_zone
>> will mark all page in node range to Reserved in struct page, at first.
>>
>> but those holes is not mapped via kernel low mapping.
>> so it should be ok not touch "struct page" for them.
>>
>> Now you only mark reserved for memblock.reserved at first, and later
>> mark {memblock.memory} - { memblock.reserved} to be available.
>> And that is ok.
>>
>> but should split that change to another patch and add some comment
>> and change log for the change.
>> in case there is some user like UEFI etc do weird thing.
>
> Nate and I talked this over today.  Sorry for the delay, but it was the
> first time we were both free.  Neither of us quite understands what you
> are asking for here.  My interpretation is that you would like us to
> change the use of the PageReserved flag such that during boot, we do not
> set the flag at all from memmap_init_zone, and then only set it on pages
> which, at the time of free_all_bootmem, have been allocated/reserved in
> the memblock allocator.  Is that correct?  I will start to work that up
> on the assumption that is what you are asking for.

Not exactly.

your change should be right, but there is some subtle change about
holes handling.

before mem holes between memory ranges in memblock.memory, get struct page,
and initialized with to Reserved in memmap_init_zone.
Those holes is not in memory.reserved, with your patches, those hole's
struct page
will still have all 0.

Please separate change about set page to reserved according to memory.reserved
to another patch.

Thanks

Yinghai

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array.
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 05:50:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV7Va8iAESoXsPCFJo8-jeA=-7SW2b9BmKnUrVonLV1=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725022543.GR3421@sgi.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
>>
>> How about holes that is not in memblock.reserved?
>>
>> before this patch:
>> free_area_init_node/free_area_init_core/memmap_init_zone
>> will mark all page in node range to Reserved in struct page, at first.
>>
>> but those holes is not mapped via kernel low mapping.
>> so it should be ok not touch "struct page" for them.
>>
>> Now you only mark reserved for memblock.reserved at first, and later
>> mark {memblock.memory} - { memblock.reserved} to be available.
>> And that is ok.
>>
>> but should split that change to another patch and add some comment
>> and change log for the change.
>> in case there is some user like UEFI etc do weird thing.
>
> Nate and I talked this over today.  Sorry for the delay, but it was the
> first time we were both free.  Neither of us quite understands what you
> are asking for here.  My interpretation is that you would like us to
> change the use of the PageReserved flag such that during boot, we do not
> set the flag at all from memmap_init_zone, and then only set it on pages
> which, at the time of free_all_bootmem, have been allocated/reserved in
> the memblock allocator.  Is that correct?  I will start to work that up
> on the assumption that is what you are asking for.

Not exactly.

your change should be right, but there is some subtle change about
holes handling.

before mem holes between memory ranges in memblock.memory, get struct page,
and initialized with to Reserved in memmap_init_zone.
Those holes is not in memory.reserved, with your patches, those hole's
struct page
will still have all 0.

Please separate change about set page to reserved according to memory.reserved
to another patch.

Thanks

Yinghai

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-25 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 153+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-12  2:03 [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 1/4] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 2/4] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  7:45   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  7:45     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-13  3:08     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  3:08       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-16 13:02   ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 13:02     ` Sam Ben
2013-07-23 15:32     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-23 15:32       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 3/4] Seperate page initialization into a separate function Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-13  3:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  3:06     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-15  3:19     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15  3:19       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-13  4:19   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  4:19     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  4:39     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-13  4:39       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-13  5:31       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  5:31         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  5:38         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-13  5:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 14:08         ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 14:08           ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 17:45     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 17:45       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 17:54       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 17:54         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 18:26         ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15 18:26           ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15 18:29           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 18:29             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-23  8:32             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23  8:32               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23 11:09               ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:09                 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:15                 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:15                   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:41                   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:41                     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:50                     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:50                       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16 10:26     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16 10:26       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25  2:25     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25  2:25       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25 12:50       ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2013-07-25 12:50         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-25 13:42         ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25 13:42           ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25 13:52           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-25 13:52             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-15 21:30   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-15 21:30     ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-16 10:38     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16 10:38       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  8:27 ` [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  8:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  8:47   ` boot tracing Borislav Petkov
2013-07-12  8:47     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-12  8:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  8:53       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-15  1:38       ` Sam Ben
2013-07-15  1:38         ` Sam Ben
2013-07-23  8:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23  8:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  9:19   ` [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Robert Richter
2013-07-12  9:19     ` Robert Richter
2013-07-15 15:16   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15 15:16     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16  8:55   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16  8:55     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16  9:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-16  9:08       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-23  8:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23  8:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-15 15:00 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15 15:00   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-17  5:17 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-17  5:17   ` Sam Ben
2013-07-17  9:30   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-17  9:30     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-19 23:51     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-22  6:13       ` Robin Holt
2013-07-22  6:13         ` Robin Holt
2013-08-02 17:44 ` [RFC v2 0/5] " Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 1/5] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 2/5] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 3/5] Move page initialization into a separate function Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 4/5] Only set page reserved in the memblock region Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-03 20:04     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-03 20:04       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 5/5] Sparse initialization of struct page array Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-05  9:58   ` [RFC v2 0/5] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-08-05  9:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-12 21:54   ` [RFC v3 " Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 1/5] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 2/5] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 3/5] Move page initialization into a separate function Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 4/5] Only set page reserved in the memblock region Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 5/5] Sparse initialization of struct page array Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54       ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 10:58     ` [RFC v3 0/5] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 10:58       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 17:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 17:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 17:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 17:23         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 17:33       ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 17:33         ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 17:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 17:51           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 18:04           ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 18:04             ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 19:06             ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 19:06               ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 20:24               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-13 20:24                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-13 20:37                 ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 20:37                   ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 21:35             ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 21:35               ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 23:10           ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 23:10             ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 23:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 23:55               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-14 11:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 11:27                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 11:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 11:05             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 22:15             ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-14 22:15               ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-16 16:36     ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-16 16:36       ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE9FiQV7Va8iAESoXsPCFJo8-jeA=-7SW2b9BmKnUrVonLV1=g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.