[U-Boot] [PATCH 14/20] x86: Provide access to the IDT

[Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>]

Hi Simon,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 28 April 2015 at 02:16, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Add a function to return the address of the Interrupt Descriptor Table.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c        | 5 +++++
>>>  arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h | 2 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c b/arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c
>>> index a21d2a6..c777d36 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ int cpu_init_interrupts(void)
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +void *x86_get_idt(void)
>>> +{
>>> +       return &idt_ptr;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> idt_ptr is not declared as static, so this is unneeded? Or should we
>> change it to static?
>
> I think it is better to access it via a function. It is used from
> assembler so I would rather not make it static. Any thoughts?
>

OK, fair enough.

[snip]

Regards,
Bin