All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure
@ 2021-11-08  2:14 Li Wang
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs Li Wang
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-08  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Testcases for specific arch should be limited on that only being supported
platform to run, we now involve a .supported_archs to achieve this feature
in LTP library. All you need to run a test on the expected arch is to set
the '.supported_archs' array in the 'struct tst_test' to choose the required
arch list. e.g.

    .supported_archs = (const char *const []){"x86_64", "ppc64", NULL}

This helps move the TCONF info from code to tst_test metadata as well.

And, we also export a struct tst_arch to save the system architecture
for using in the whole test cases.

    extern struct arch {
             char name[16];
             enum tst_arch_type type;
    } tst_arch;

Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
 doc/c-test-api.txt |  36 +++++++++++++++
 include/tst_arch.h |  39 ++++++++++++++++
 include/tst_test.h |  10 +++++
 lib/tst_arch.c     | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/tst_arch.h
 create mode 100644 lib/tst_arch.c

diff --git a/doc/c-test-api.txt b/doc/c-test-api.txt
index 3127018a4..5e32b7075 100644
--- a/doc/c-test-api.txt
+++ b/doc/c-test-api.txt
@@ -2261,6 +2261,42 @@ struct tst_test test = {
 };
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+1.39 Testing on the specific architecture
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Testcases for specific arch should be limited on that only being supported
+platform to run, we now involve a .supported_archs to achieve this feature
+in LTP library. All you need to run a test on the expected arch is to set
+the '.supported_archs' array in the 'struct tst_test' to choose the required
+arch list. e.g.
+
+    .supported_archs = (const char *const []){"x86_64", "ppc64", NULL}
+
+This helps move the TCONF info from code to tst_test metadata as well.
+
+And, we also export a struct tst_arch to save the system architecture for
+using in the whole test cases.
+
+    extern struct arch {
+             char name[16];
+             enum tst_arch_type type;
+    } tst_arch;
+
+[source,c]
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+       ...
+       .setup = setup,
+       .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+                 "x86_64",
+                 "ppc64",
+                 "s390x",
+                 NULL
+       },
+};
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
 2. Common problems
 ------------------
 
diff --git a/include/tst_arch.h b/include/tst_arch.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..784c3093b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/tst_arch.h
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+ * Copyright (c) 2021 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef TST_ARCH_H__
+#define TST_ARCH_H__
+
+enum tst_arch_type {
+	TST_I386,
+	TST_X86,
+	TST_X86_64,
+	TST_IA64,
+	TST_PPC,
+	TST_PPC64,
+	TST_S390,
+	TST_S390X,
+	TST_ARM,
+	TST_AARCH64,
+	TST_SPARC,
+};
+
+/*
+ * This tst_arch is to save the system architecture for
+ * using in the whole testcase.
+ */
+extern struct arch {
+	char name[16];
+	enum tst_arch_type type;
+} tst_arch;
+
+/*
+ * Check if test platform is in the given arch list. If yes return 1,
+ * otherwise return 0.
+ *
+ * @archlist A NULL terminated array of architectures to support.
+ */
+int tst_is_on_arch(const char *const *archlist);
+
+#endif /* TST_ARCH_H__ */
diff --git a/include/tst_test.h b/include/tst_test.h
index 3dcb45de0..7611520ee 100644
--- a/include/tst_test.h
+++ b/include/tst_test.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include "tst_fips.h"
 #include "tst_taint.h"
 #include "tst_memutils.h"
+#include "tst_arch.h"
 
 /*
  * Reports testcase result.
@@ -139,6 +140,12 @@ struct tst_test {
 
 	const char *min_kver;
 
+	/*
+	 * The supported_archs is a NULL terminated list of archs the test
+	 * does support.
+	 */
+	const char *const *supported_archs;
+
 	/* If set the test is compiled out */
 	const char *tconf_msg;
 
@@ -316,6 +323,9 @@ static struct tst_test test;
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
+	if (!tst_is_on_arch(test.supported_archs))
+		tst_brk(TCONF, "This arch '%s' is not supported for test!", tst_arch.name);
+
 	tst_run_tcases(argc, argv, &test);
 }
 
diff --git a/lib/tst_arch.c b/lib/tst_arch.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ae5817075
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/tst_arch.c
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+ * Copyright (c) 2021 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
+ */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#define TST_NO_DEFAULT_MAIN
+#include "tst_arch.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+struct arch tst_arch;
+
+static const char *const arch_type_list[] = {
+	"i386",
+	"x86",
+	"x86_64",
+	"ia64",
+	"ppc",
+	"ppc64",
+	"s390",
+	"s390x",
+	"arm",
+	"aarch64",
+	"sparc",
+	NULL
+};
+
+static int is_matched_arch(const char *arch, const char *name)
+{
+	if (strcmp(arch, name) == 0)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int is_valid_arch_name(const char *name)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; arch_type_list[i]; i++) {
+		if (is_matched_arch(arch_type_list[i], name))
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void get_system_arch(void)
+{
+#if defined(__i386__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "i386");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_I386;
+#elif defined(__x86__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "x86");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_X86;
+#elif defined(__x86_64__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "x86_64");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_X86_64;
+#elif defined(__ia64__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ia64");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_IA64;
+#elif defined(__powerpc__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ppc");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_PPC;
+#elif defined(__powerpc64__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ppc64");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_PPC64;
+#elif defined(__s390x__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390x");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_S390X;
+#elif defined(__s390__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_S390;
+#elif defined(__arm__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390x");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_ARM;
+#elif defined(__aarch64__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "aarch64");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_AARCH64;
+#elif defined(__sparc__)
+	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "sparc");
+	tst_arch.type = TST_SPARC;
+#endif
+}
+
+int tst_is_on_arch(const char *const *archlist)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	get_system_arch();
+
+	if (archlist == NULL)
+		return 1;
+
+	for (i = 0; archlist[i]; i++) {
+		if (!is_valid_arch_name(archlist[i]))
+			tst_brk(TBROK, "%s is invalid arch, please reset!",
+					archlist[i]);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; archlist[i]; i++) {
+		if (is_matched_arch(tst_arch.name, archlist[i]))
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.31.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs
  2021-11-08  2:14 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Li Wang
@ 2021-11-08  2:14 ` Li Wang
  2021-11-08 12:41   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch Li Wang
  2021-11-08 12:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Cyril Hrubis
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-08  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

In some places, we have to keep ifdefs to make the compiler work
with unportable code.

Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
 configure.ac                                  |  1 +
 testcases/cve/meltdown.c                      | 16 ++++++-----
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c   | 11 ++++----
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c   | 22 ++++++++-------
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace09.c   | 11 +++++---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace10.c   | 12 +++++----
 .../syscalls/set_mempolicy/set_mempolicy05.c  | 27 +++++++++----------
 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 5bf3c52ec..7efd9df87 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([SEM_STAT_ANY],,,[#include <sys/sem.h>])
 
 AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE([ \
     asm/ldt.h \
+    emmintrin.h \
     ifaddrs.h \
     keyutils.h \
     linux/can.h \
diff --git a/testcases/cve/meltdown.c b/testcases/cve/meltdown.c
index 5a984aba3..2577c1a80 100644
--- a/testcases/cve/meltdown.c
+++ b/testcases/cve/meltdown.c
@@ -6,8 +6,6 @@
 #include "config.h"
 #include "tst_test.h"
 
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)
-
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <signal.h>
@@ -17,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <ctype.h>
 #include <sys/utsname.h>
 
+#ifdef HAVE_EMMINTRIN_H
 #include <emmintrin.h>
 
 #include "tst_tsc.h"
@@ -378,14 +377,17 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.test_all = run,
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.min_kver = "2.6.32",
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"i386",
+		"x86_64",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"CVE", "2017-5754"},
 		{}
 	}
 };
 
-#else /* #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) */
-
-TST_TEST_TCONF("not x86_64 or i386");
-
-#endif /* #else #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) */
+#else /* HAVE_EMMINTRIN_H */
+	TST_TEST_TCONF("<emmintrin.h> is not supported");
+#endif
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
index 9e3f7511d..da62cadb0 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@
 # define NT_X86_XSTATE 0x202
 #endif
 
-#ifdef __x86_64__
 static void check_regs_loop(uint32_t initval)
 {
 	const unsigned long num_iters = 1000000000;
 	uint32_t xmm0[4] = { initval, initval, initval, initval };
 	int status = 1;
 
+#ifdef __x86_64__
 	asm volatile("   movdqu %0, %%xmm0\n"
 		     "   mov %0, %%rbx\n"
 		     "1: dec %2\n"
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static void check_regs_loop(uint32_t initval)
 		     "3:\n"
 		     : "+m" (xmm0), "+r" (status)
 		     : "r" (num_iters) : "rax", "rbx", "xmm0");
+#endif
 
 	if (status) {
 		tst_res(TFAIL,
@@ -178,6 +179,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.test_all = do_test,
 	.forks_child = 1,
 	.needs_checkpoints = 1,
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"x86_64",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"linux-git", "814fb7bb7db5"},
 		{"CVE", "2017-15537"},
@@ -185,7 +190,3 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	}
 
 };
-
-#else /* !__x86_64__ */
-	TST_TEST_TCONF("this test is only supported on x86_64");
-#endif /* __x86_64__ */
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
index f86f69a9c..77c4c10c3 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
@@ -43,18 +43,16 @@
 #include "tst_test.h"
 #include "tst_safe_stdio.h"
 
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
-
 static pid_t child_pid;
 
-#if defined(__x86_64__)
-# define KERN_ADDR_MIN 0xffff800000000000
-# define KERN_ADDR_MAX 0xffffffffffffffff
-# define KERN_ADDR_BITS 64
-#elif defined(__i386__)
+#if defined(__i386__)
 # define KERN_ADDR_MIN 0xc0000000
 # define KERN_ADDR_MAX 0xffffffff
 # define KERN_ADDR_BITS 32
+#else
+# define KERN_ADDR_MIN 0xffff800000000000
+# define KERN_ADDR_MAX 0xffffffffffffffff
+# define KERN_ADDR_BITS 64
 #endif
 
 static int deffered_check;
@@ -106,6 +104,7 @@ static void ptrace_try_kern_addr(unsigned long kern_addr)
 	if (SAFE_WAITPID(child_pid, &status, WUNTRACED) != child_pid)
 		tst_brk(TBROK, "Received event from unexpected PID");
 
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_ATTACH, child_pid, NULL, NULL);
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child_pid,
 		(void *)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), (void *)1);
@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ static void ptrace_try_kern_addr(unsigned long kern_addr)
 
 	addr = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child_pid,
 	              (void*)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), NULL);
+#endif
 
 	if (!deffered_check && addr == kern_addr)
 		tst_res(TFAIL, "Was able to set breakpoint on kernel addr");
@@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.setup = setup,
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.forks_child = 1,
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"i386",
+		"x86_64",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"linux-git", "f67b15037a7a"},
 		{"CVE", "2018-1000199"},
@@ -171,6 +176,3 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 		{}
 	}
 };
-#else
-TST_TEST_TCONF("This test is only supported on x86 systems");
-#endif
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace09.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace09.c
index 85875ce65..8ccdfcc4b 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace09.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace09.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include "tst_test.h"
 
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
 static short watchpoint;
 static pid_t child_pid;
 
@@ -46,6 +45,7 @@ static void run(void)
 {
 	int status;
 
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
 	child_pid = SAFE_FORK();
 
 	if (!child_pid) {
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static void run(void)
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child_pid,
 		(void *)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[7]), (void *)0x30001);
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, NULL);
+#endif
 
 	while (1) {
 		if (SAFE_WAITPID(child_pid, &status, 0) != child_pid)
@@ -92,12 +93,14 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.test_all = run,
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.forks_child = 1,
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"i386",
+		"x86_64",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"linux-git", "d8ba61ba58c8"},
 		{"CVE", "2018-8897"},
 		{}
 	}
 };
-#else
-TST_TEST_TCONF("This test is only supported on x86 systems");
-#endif
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace10.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace10.c
index b5d6b9f8f..3bd8ca1a9 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace10.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace10.c
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include "tst_test.h"
 
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
-
 static pid_t child_pid;
 
 static void child_main(void)
@@ -45,6 +43,7 @@ static void run(void)
 	if (SAFE_WAITPID(child_pid, &status, WUNTRACED) != child_pid)
 		tst_brk(TBROK, "Received event from unexpected PID");
 
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_ATTACH, child_pid, NULL, NULL);
 	SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child_pid,
 		(void *)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), (void *)1);
@@ -53,6 +52,7 @@ static void run(void)
 
 	addr = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child_pid,
 	              (void*)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), NULL);
+#endif
 
 	if (addr == 2)
 		tst_res(TPASS, "The rd0 was set on second PTRACE_POKEUSR");
@@ -76,11 +76,13 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
 	.test_all = run,
 	.cleanup = cleanup,
 	.forks_child = 1,
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"i386",
+		"x86_64",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"linux-git", "bd14406b78e6"},
 		{}
 	}
 };
-#else
-TST_TEST_TCONF("This test is only supported on x86 systems");
-#endif
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_mempolicy/set_mempolicy05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_mempolicy/set_mempolicy05.c
index 86f6a95dc..f56b7b26f 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_mempolicy/set_mempolicy05.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_mempolicy/set_mempolicy05.c
@@ -37,18 +37,10 @@
 #include "config.h"
 #include "tst_test.h"
 
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__powerpc__)
-
 #include <string.h>
 
 static unsigned int i;
 static int sys_ret;
-#ifdef __i386__
-static const int sys_num = 276;
-static const int mode;
-static const int node_mask_ptr = UINT_MAX;
-static const int node_mask_sz = UINT_MAX;
-#endif
 static volatile char *stack_ptr;
 
 static void run(void)
@@ -58,6 +50,11 @@ static void run(void)
 	register long mode __asm__("r3");
 	register long node_mask_ptr __asm__("r4");
 	register long node_mask_sz __asm__("r5");
+#else
+	static const int sys_num = 276;
+	static const int mode;
+	static const int node_mask_ptr = UINT_MAX;
+	static const int node_mask_sz = UINT_MAX;
 #endif
 	char stack_pattern[0x400];
 
@@ -78,7 +75,8 @@ static void run(void)
 		:
 		"memory", "cr0", "r6", "r7", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11", "r12");
 	sys_ret = mode;
-#else /* __i386__ */
+#endif
+#ifdef __i386__
 	asm volatile (
 		"add $0x400, %%esp\n\t"
 		"int $0x80\n\t"
@@ -114,15 +112,14 @@ static void run(void)
 
 static struct tst_test test = {
 	.test_all = run,
+	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+		"i386",
+		"ppc",
+		NULL
+	},
 	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
 		{"linux-git", "cf01fb9985e8"},
 		{"CVE", "CVE-2017-7616"},
 		{}
 	}
 };
-
-#else /* #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
-
-TST_TEST_TCONF("not i386 or powerpc");
-
-#endif /* #else #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
-- 
2.31.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch
  2021-11-08  2:14 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Li Wang
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs Li Wang
@ 2021-11-08  2:14 ` Li Wang
  2021-11-08 12:44   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-08 12:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Cyril Hrubis
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-08  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c | 41 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
index 4f0ad0037..9da67520c 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
@@ -91,24 +91,29 @@ static bool filter_map(const char *line)
 	if (ret != 1)
 		return false;
 
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__x86__)
-	/* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
-	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
-		return true;
-#elif defined(__ia64__)
-	/* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
-	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
-		return true;
-#elif defined(__arm__)
-	/* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
-	if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
-	|| (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
-		return false;
-
-	/* Older arm kernels didn't label their vdso maps */
-	if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
-		return true;
-#endif
+	switch (tst_arch.type) {
+	case TST_X86:
+	case TST_X86_64:
+		/* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
+		if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
+			return true;
+	break;
+	case TST_IA64:
+		/* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
+		if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
+			return true;
+	break;
+	case TST_ARM:
+		/* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
+		if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
+				|| (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
+			return false;
+
+		/* Older arm kernels didn't label their vdso maps */
+		if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
+			return true;
+	break;
+	};
 
 	return false;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure
  2021-11-08  2:14 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Li Wang
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs Li Wang
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch Li Wang
@ 2021-11-08 12:34 ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-09  7:52   ` Li Wang
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2021-11-08 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Wang; +Cc: ltp

Hi!
> Testcases for specific arch should be limited on that only being supported
> platform to run, we now involve a .supported_archs to achieve this feature
> in LTP library. All you need to run a test on the expected arch is to set
> the '.supported_archs' array in the 'struct tst_test' to choose the required
> arch list. e.g.
> 
>     .supported_archs = (const char *const []){"x86_64", "ppc64", NULL}
> 
> This helps move the TCONF info from code to tst_test metadata as well.
> 
> And, we also export a struct tst_arch to save the system architecture
> for using in the whole test cases.
> 
>     extern struct arch {
>              char name[16];
>              enum tst_arch_type type;
>     } tst_arch;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/c-test-api.txt |  36 +++++++++++++++
>  include/tst_arch.h |  39 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/tst_test.h |  10 +++++
>  lib/tst_arch.c     | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/tst_arch.h
>  create mode 100644 lib/tst_arch.c
> 
> diff --git a/doc/c-test-api.txt b/doc/c-test-api.txt
> index 3127018a4..5e32b7075 100644
> --- a/doc/c-test-api.txt
> +++ b/doc/c-test-api.txt
> @@ -2261,6 +2261,42 @@ struct tst_test test = {
>  };
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> +1.39 Testing on the specific architecture
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +Testcases for specific arch should be limited on that only being supported
> +platform to run, we now involve a .supported_archs to achieve this feature
> +in LTP library. All you need to run a test on the expected arch is to set
> +the '.supported_archs' array in the 'struct tst_test' to choose the required
> +arch list. e.g.
> +
> +    .supported_archs = (const char *const []){"x86_64", "ppc64", NULL}
> +
> +This helps move the TCONF info from code to tst_test metadata as well.
> +
> +And, we also export a struct tst_arch to save the system architecture for
> +using in the whole test cases.
> +
> +    extern struct arch {
> +             char name[16];
> +             enum tst_arch_type type;
> +    } tst_arch;
> +
> +[source,c]
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +       ...
> +       .setup = setup,
> +       .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
> +                 "x86_64",
> +                 "ppc64",
> +                 "s390x",
> +                 NULL
> +       },
> +};
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +
>  2. Common problems
>  ------------------
>  
> diff --git a/include/tst_arch.h b/include/tst_arch.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..784c3093b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/tst_arch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef TST_ARCH_H__
> +#define TST_ARCH_H__
> +
> +enum tst_arch_type {
> +	TST_I386,
> +	TST_X86,

Why do we have both i386 and X86 here? Isn't __i386__ synonymous for
__x86__ does gcc even define __x86__?

I doubt that we care about the differencies between i386, i586 and i686
at all. I would just keep TST_X86 in the list for any 32bit intel
compatible hardware.

> +	TST_X86_64,
> +	TST_IA64,
> +	TST_PPC,
> +	TST_PPC64,
> +	TST_S390,
> +	TST_S390X,
> +	TST_ARM,
> +	TST_AARCH64,
> +	TST_SPARC,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * This tst_arch is to save the system architecture for
> + * using in the whole testcase.
> + */
> +extern struct arch {
> +	char name[16];
> +	enum tst_arch_type type;
> +} tst_arch;

the struct should be prefixed with tst_ as well. i.e.

extern struct tst_arch {
	...

> +/*
> + * Check if test platform is in the given arch list. If yes return 1,
> + * otherwise return 0.
> + *
> + * @archlist A NULL terminated array of architectures to support.
> + */
> +int tst_is_on_arch(const char *const *archlist);
> +
> +#endif /* TST_ARCH_H__ */
> diff --git a/include/tst_test.h b/include/tst_test.h
> index 3dcb45de0..7611520ee 100644
> --- a/include/tst_test.h
> +++ b/include/tst_test.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include "tst_fips.h"
>  #include "tst_taint.h"
>  #include "tst_memutils.h"
> +#include "tst_arch.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Reports testcase result.
> @@ -139,6 +140,12 @@ struct tst_test {
>  
>  	const char *min_kver;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The supported_archs is a NULL terminated list of archs the test
> +	 * does support.
> +	 */
> +	const char *const *supported_archs;
> +
>  	/* If set the test is compiled out */
>  	const char *tconf_msg;
>  
> @@ -316,6 +323,9 @@ static struct tst_test test;
>  
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
> +	if (!tst_is_on_arch(test.supported_archs))
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "This arch '%s' is not supported for test!", tst_arch.name);

Why are you putting this check into the header? All the other checks are
in the do_setup() in lib/tst_test.c

>  	tst_run_tcases(argc, argv, &test);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/lib/tst_arch.c b/lib/tst_arch.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..ae5817075
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/tst_arch.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +#define TST_NO_DEFAULT_MAIN
> +#include "tst_arch.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +struct arch tst_arch;
> +
> +static const char *const arch_type_list[] = {
> +	"i386",
> +	"x86",
> +	"x86_64",
> +	"ia64",
> +	"ppc",
> +	"ppc64",
> +	"s390",
> +	"s390x",
> +	"arm",
> +	"aarch64",
> +	"sparc",
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static int is_matched_arch(const char *arch, const char *name)
> +{
> +	if (strcmp(arch, name) == 0)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int is_valid_arch_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; arch_type_list[i]; i++) {
> +		if (is_matched_arch(arch_type_list[i], name))
> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void get_system_arch(void)
> +{
> +#if defined(__i386__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "i386");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_I386;
> +#elif defined(__x86__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "x86");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_X86;
> +#elif defined(__x86_64__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "x86_64");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_X86_64;
> +#elif defined(__ia64__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ia64");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_IA64;
> +#elif defined(__powerpc__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ppc");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_PPC;
> +#elif defined(__powerpc64__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "ppc64");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_PPC64;
> +#elif defined(__s390x__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390x");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_S390X;
> +#elif defined(__s390__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_S390;
> +#elif defined(__arm__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "s390x");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_ARM;
> +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "aarch64");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_AARCH64;
> +#elif defined(__sparc__)
> +	strcpy(tst_arch.name, "sparc");
> +	tst_arch.type = TST_SPARC;
> +#endif
> +}

Actually we can initialize this staically as:

const struct arch tst_arch = {
#if defined(__x86_64__)
	.name = "x86_64",
	.type = TST_X86_64,
#elif
...
#else
	.name = "unknown",
	.type = TST_ARCH_UNKNOWN,
#endif
};

> +int tst_is_on_arch(const char *const *archlist)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	get_system_arch();
> +
> +	if (archlist == NULL)
> +		return 1;

Just if (!archlist)

> +	for (i = 0; archlist[i]; i++) {
> +		if (!is_valid_arch_name(archlist[i]))
> +			tst_brk(TBROK, "%s is invalid arch, please reset!",
                                                                   ^
								   fix?
> +					archlist[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; archlist[i]; i++) {
> +		if (is_matched_arch(tst_arch.name, archlist[i]))

I would just do !strcmp() here, there is no point in havin a function
that just calls strcmp() and returns the result.

> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs Li Wang
@ 2021-11-08 12:41   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-09  6:52     ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2021-11-08 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Wang; +Cc: ltp

Hi!
>  	asm volatile (
>  		"add $0x400, %%esp\n\t"
>  		"int $0x80\n\t"
> @@ -114,15 +112,14 @@ static void run(void)
>  
>  static struct tst_test test = {
>  	.test_all = run,
> +	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
> +		"i386",
> +		"ppc",
> +		NULL
> +	},
>  	.tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
>  		{"linux-git", "cf01fb9985e8"},
>  		{"CVE", "CVE-2017-7616"},
>  		{}
>  	}
>  };
> -
> -#else /* #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
> -
> -TST_TEST_TCONF("not i386 or powerpc");
> -
> -#endif /* #else #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */

Accordingly to this table:

https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo

__powerpc__ matches both 32bit and 64bit variants.

I guess that we would have to change the checks in the library as:

#ifdef __powerpc__
# ifdef __powerpc64__ || __ppc64__
.arch = "ppc64",
.type = TST_PPC64,
# else
.arch = "ppc",
.type = "TST_PPC"
# endif
#endif

Also I guess that gcc does not define __x86__ for historical reasons and
__i386__ really means __x86__, but I haven't checked that one.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch
  2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch Li Wang
@ 2021-11-08 12:44   ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-09  9:35     ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2021-11-08 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Wang; +Cc: ltp

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 10:14:50AM +0800, Li Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c | 41 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
> index 4f0ad0037..9da67520c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/tunable/max_map_count.c
> @@ -91,24 +91,29 @@ static bool filter_map(const char *line)
>  	if (ret != 1)
>  		return false;
>  
> -#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__x86__)
> -	/* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
> -	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
> -		return true;
> -#elif defined(__ia64__)
> -	/* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
> -	if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
> -		return true;
> -#elif defined(__arm__)
> -	/* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
> -	if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
> -	|| (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	/* Older arm kernels didn't label their vdso maps */
> -	if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
> -		return true;
> -#endif
> +	switch (tst_arch.type) {
> +	case TST_X86:
> +	case TST_X86_64:
> +		/* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
> +		if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
> +			return true;
> +	break;
> +	case TST_IA64:
> +		/* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
> +		if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
> +			return true;
> +	break;
> +	case TST_ARM:
> +		/* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
> +		if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
> +				|| (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
> +			return false;

		I wonder if this would be better as:

		if (tst_kernel_bits() == 64)
			return false;

Other than this the code looks actually better this way.

> +		/* Older arm kernels didn't label their vdso maps */
> +		if (!strncmp(line, "ffff0000-ffff1000", 17))
> +			return true;
> +	break;
> +	};
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs
  2021-11-08 12:41   ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2021-11-09  6:52     ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-09  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: LTP List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1916 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:40 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:

> Hi!
> >       asm volatile (
> >               "add $0x400, %%esp\n\t"
> >               "int $0x80\n\t"
> > @@ -114,15 +112,14 @@ static void run(void)
> >
> >  static struct tst_test test = {
> >       .test_all = run,
> > +     .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
> > +             "i386",
> > +             "ppc",
> > +             NULL
> > +     },
> >       .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> >               {"linux-git", "cf01fb9985e8"},
> >               {"CVE", "CVE-2017-7616"},
> >               {}
> >       }
> >  };
> > -
> > -#else /* #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
> > -
> > -TST_TEST_TCONF("not i386 or powerpc");
> > -
> > -#endif /* #else #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
>
> Accordingly to this table:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
>
> __powerpc__ matches both 32bit and 64bit variants.
>
> I guess that we would have to change the checks in the library as:
>

Yes, but I think we can simply reverse the order to solve this.
It will try to match 64bit firstly otherwise 32bit. The s390 does as well.

....
#elif defined(__powerpc64__ || __ppc64__)
        .name = "ppc64",
        .type = TST_PPC64,
#elif defined(__powerpc__ || __ppc__)
        .name = "ppc",
        .type = TST_PPC,
#elif defined(__s390x__)
        .name = "s390x",
        .type = TST_S390X,
#elif defined(__s390__)
        .name = "s390",
        .type = TST_S390,
....



>
> #ifdef __powerpc__
> # ifdef __powerpc64__ || __ppc64__
> .arch = "ppc64",
> .type = TST_PPC64,
> # else
> .arch = "ppc",
> .type = "TST_PPC"
> # endif
> #endif
>
> Also I guess that gcc does not define __x86__ for historical reasons and
> __i386__ really means __x86__, but I haven't checked that one.
>

You are right. And next we have to get rid of __x86__ from ltp testcase.


-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3607 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure
  2021-11-08 12:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Cyril Hrubis
@ 2021-11-09  7:52   ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-09  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: LTP List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1068 bytes --]

> > diff --git a/include/tst_arch.h b/include/tst_arch.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000..784c3093b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/tst_arch.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > + * Copyright (c) 2021 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef TST_ARCH_H__
> > +#define TST_ARCH_H__
> > +
> > +enum tst_arch_type {
> > +     TST_I386,
> > +     TST_X86,
>
> Why do we have both i386 and X86 here? Isn't __i386__ synonymous for
> __x86__ does gcc even define __x86__?
>

My fault, I just copy that from testcase defines and didn't check
if __x86__ validatable or not.

>
> I doubt that we care about the differencies between i386, i586 and i686
> at all. I would just keep TST_X86 in the list for any 32bit intel
> compatible hardware.
>

I prefer to only keep TST_I386 and TST_X86_64 for use. Becuase
so far I didn't see there is a requirement on i[4|5|6]86 in LTP at all.
And, we can add that if we really need it in the future.

The rest of the comments looks good, thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2119 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch
  2021-11-08 12:44   ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2021-11-09  9:35     ` Li Wang
  2021-11-09 10:47       ` Cyril Hrubis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-09  9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: LTP List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]

> > +     switch (tst_arch.type) {
> > +     case TST_X86:
> > +     case TST_X86_64:
> > +             /* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
> > +             if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
> > +                     return true;
> > +     break;
> > +     case TST_IA64:
> > +             /* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
> > +             if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
> > +                     return true;
> > +     break;
> > +     case TST_ARM:
> > +             /* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
> > +             if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
> > +                             || (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
> > +                     return false;
>
>                 I wonder if this would be better as:
>
>                 if (tst_kernel_bits() == 64)
>                         return false;
>

Actually, we have TST_AARCH64 already, I'd go with switch to that.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1636 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch
  2021-11-09  9:35     ` Li Wang
@ 2021-11-09 10:47       ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-11-09 11:41         ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2021-11-09 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Wang; +Cc: LTP List

Hi!
> > > +     switch (tst_arch.type) {
> > > +     case TST_X86:
> > > +     case TST_X86_64:
> > > +             /* On x86, there's an old compat vsyscall page */
> > > +             if (!strcmp(buf, "[vsyscall]"))
> > > +                     return true;
> > > +     break;
> > > +     case TST_IA64:
> > > +             /* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */
> > > +             if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]"))
> > > +                     return true;
> > > +     break;
> > > +     case TST_ARM:
> > > +             /* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */
> > > +             if ((!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64"))
> > > +                             || (!strcmp(un.machine, "aarch64_be")))
> > > +                     return false;
> >
> >                 I wonder if this would be better as:
> >
> >                 if (tst_kernel_bits() == 64)
> >                         return false;
> >
> 
> Actually, we have TST_AARCH64 already, I'd go with switch to that.

That wouldn't work right? Since we are checking here if 32bit ARM binary
runs on 64bit AARCH64 kernel. The tst_arch defines for which
architecture the binary was build while the tst_kernel_bits() checks if
the kernel is 32bit or 64bit.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch
  2021-11-09 10:47       ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2021-11-09 11:41         ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2021-11-09 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cyril Hrubis; +Cc: LTP List


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]

> > >                 I wonder if this would be better as:
> > >
> > >                 if (tst_kernel_bits() == 64)
> > >                         return false;
> > >
> >
> > Actually, we have TST_AARCH64 already, I'd go with switch to that.
>
> That wouldn't work right? Since we are checking here if 32bit ARM binary
> runs on 64bit AARCH64 kernel. The tst_arch defines for which
> architecture the binary was build while the tst_kernel_bits() checks if
> the kernel is 32bit or 64bit.
>

Right, I didn't realize that situation. Thanks for the reminder~


-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1100 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-09 11:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-08  2:14 [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Li Wang
2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/3] testcase: make use of .supported_archs Li Wang
2021-11-08 12:41   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-11-09  6:52     ` Li Wang
2021-11-08  2:14 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch Li Wang
2021-11-08 12:44   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-11-09  9:35     ` Li Wang
2021-11-09 10:47       ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-11-09 11:41         ` Li Wang
2021-11-08 12:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure Cyril Hrubis
2021-11-09  7:52   ` Li Wang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.