All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* What is the preferred way to add build data to os-release
@ 2018-03-29  8:08 Måns Zigher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Måns Zigher @ 2018-03-29  8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yocto discussion list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]

Hi,

I see a lot of systems making use of the /etc/os-release where they put in
build information like sha, build numbers and version numbers. When doing
that you will encounter basehash errors and taskhash errors from bitbake in
my experience (or I might be doing something wrong). To remove these errors
adjustments needs to be taken on the os-release recipe.  These adjustments
will likely result in re-generating rootfs everytime. Is this really what
is the preferred way of doing things? If not, what is the preferred way of
getting build data included in the os-release?

BR
Mans Zigher

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 674 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-03-29  8:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-29  8:08 What is the preferred way to add build data to os-release Måns Zigher

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.