* [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-05 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, Gurchetan Singh,
Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER, Chia-I Wu
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
care about the events can opt-out.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
@@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out_unresv;
}
- ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unresv;
+ if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
+ ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unresv;
+ }
if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
@@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
+#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
+ VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
0)
struct drm_virtgpu_map {
--
2.35.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-05 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, Gurchetan Singh,
Gerd Hoffmann, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
care about the events can opt-out.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
@@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out_unresv;
}
- ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unresv;
+ if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
+ ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unresv;
+ }
if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
@@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
+#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
+ VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
0)
struct drm_virtgpu_map {
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-05 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, Gerd Hoffmann, Gurchetan Singh,
Chia-I Wu, Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER, open list
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
care about the events can opt-out.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
@@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out_unresv;
}
- ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unresv;
+ if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
+ ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unresv;
+ }
if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
@@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
+#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
+ VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
0)
struct drm_virtgpu_map {
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
(?)
@ 2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chia-I Wu @ 2022-04-05 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, ML dri-devel,
Gurchetan Singh, Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>
> It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> care about the events can opt-out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> goto out_unresv;
> }
>
> - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_unresv;
> + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unresv;
> + }
>
> if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> 0)
>
> struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> --
> 2.35.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chia-I Wu @ 2022-04-05 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, ML dri-devel,
Gurchetan Singh, Gerd Hoffmann, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>
> It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> care about the events can opt-out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> goto out_unresv;
> }
>
> - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_unresv;
> + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unresv;
> + }
>
> if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> 0)
>
> struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> --
> 2.35.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chia-I Wu @ 2022-04-05 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: ML dri-devel, Rob Clark, David Airlie, Gerd Hoffmann,
Gurchetan Singh, Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER,
open list
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>
> It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> care about the events can opt-out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> goto out_unresv;
> }
>
> - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_unresv;
> + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unresv;
> + }
>
> if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> 0)
>
> struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> --
> 2.35.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
(?)
@ 2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-22 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chia-I Wu
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, ML dri-devel,
Gurchetan Singh, Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:57 AM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> >
> > It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> > But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> > care about the events can opt-out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
>
> Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
It turns out this patch is unnecessary.. I can simply not set
VIRTGPU_CONTEXT_PARAM_POLL_RINGS_MASK instead
so self-nak for this patch ;-)
BR,
-R
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> > include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > goto out_unresv;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto out_unresv;
> > + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> > + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unresv;
> > + }
> >
> > if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> > sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> > +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> > + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> > 0)
> >
> > struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-22 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chia-I Wu
Cc: Rob Clark, David Airlie, open list, ML dri-devel,
Gurchetan Singh, Gerd Hoffmann, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:57 AM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> >
> > It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> > But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> > care about the events can opt-out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
>
> Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
It turns out this patch is unnecessary.. I can simply not set
VIRTGPU_CONTEXT_PARAM_POLL_RINGS_MASK instead
so self-nak for this patch ;-)
BR,
-R
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> > include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > goto out_unresv;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto out_unresv;
> > + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> > + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unresv;
> > + }
> >
> > if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> > sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> > +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> > + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> > 0)
> >
> > struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event
@ 2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2022-04-22 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chia-I Wu
Cc: ML dri-devel, Rob Clark, David Airlie, Gerd Hoffmann,
Gurchetan Singh, Daniel Vetter, open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER,
open list
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:57 AM Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> >
> > It would have been cleaner to have a flag to *request* the fence event.
> > But that ship has sailed. So add a flag so that userspace which doesn't
> > care about the events can opt-out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
>
> Might want to wait for Gurchetan to chime in as he added the mechanism.
It turns out this patch is unnecessary.. I can simply not set
VIRTGPU_CONTEXT_PARAM_POLL_RINGS_MASK instead
so self-nak for this patch ;-)
BR,
-R
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 8 +++++---
> > include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > index 3a8078f2ee27..09f1aa263f91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> > @@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > goto out_unresv;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto out_unresv;
> > + if (!(exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT)) {
> > + ret = virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(dev, file, out_fence, ring_idx);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unresv;
> > + }
> >
> > if (out_fence_fd >= 0) {
> > sync_file = sync_file_create(&out_fence->f);
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > index 0512fde5e697..d06cac3407cc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
> > @@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ extern "C" {
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN 0x01
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT 0x02
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX 0x04
> > +#define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT 0x08
> > #define VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS (\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT |\
> > VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX |\
> > + VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_NO_EVENT |\
> > 0)
> >
> > struct drm_virtgpu_map {
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-22 22:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-05 17:39 [PATCH] drm/virtio: Add execbuf flag to request no fence-event Rob Clark
2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
2022-04-05 17:39 ` Rob Clark
2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
2022-04-05 17:56 ` Chia-I Wu
2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
2022-04-22 21:06 ` Rob Clark
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.