All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation
@ 2020-09-14  7:41 Xie He
  2020-09-14  9:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
  2020-09-14 20:34 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xie He @ 2020-09-14  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, netdev, linux-kernel
  Cc: Xie He, Willem de Bruijn, Eric Dumazet, Brian Norris, Cong Wang

This comment is outdated and no longer reflects the actual implementation
of af_packet.c.

Reasons for the new comment:

1.

In af_packet.c, the function packet_snd first reserves a headroom of
length (dev->hard_header_len + dev->needed_headroom).
Then if the socket is a SOCK_DGRAM socket, it calls dev_hard_header,
which calls dev->header_ops->create, to create the link layer header.
If the socket is a SOCK_RAW socket, it "un-reserves" a headroom of
length (dev->hard_header_len), and checks if the user has provided a
header sized between (dev->min_header_len) and (dev->hard_header_len)
(in dev_validate_header).
This shows the developers of af_packet.c expect hard_header_len to
be consistent with header_ops.

2.

In af_packet.c, the function packet_sendmsg_spkt has a FIXME comment.
That comment states that prepending an LL header internally in a driver
is considered a bug. I believe this bug can be fixed by setting
hard_header_len to 0, making the internal header completely invisible
to af_packet.c (and requesting the headroom in needed_headroom instead).

3.

There is a commit for a WiFi driver:
commit 9454f7a895b8 ("mwifiex: set needed_headroom, not hard_header_len")
According to the discussion about it at:
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11407493/
The author tried to set the WiFi driver's hard_header_len to the Ethernet
header length, and request additional header space internally needed by
setting needed_headroom.
This means this usage is already adopted by driver developers.

Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index af6c93ed9fa0..2d5d5fbb435c 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -93,12 +93,15 @@
 
 /*
    Assumptions:
-   - if device has no dev->hard_header routine, it adds and removes ll header
-     inside itself. In this case ll header is invisible outside of device,
-     but higher levels still should reserve dev->hard_header_len.
-     Some devices are enough clever to reallocate skb, when header
-     will not fit to reserved space (tunnel), another ones are silly
-     (PPP).
+   - If the device has no dev->header_ops, there is no LL header visible
+     above the device. In this case, its hard_header_len should be 0.
+     The device may prepend its own header internally. In this case, its
+     needed_headroom should be set to the space needed for it to add its
+     internal header.
+     For example, a WiFi driver pretending to be an Ethernet driver should
+     set its hard_header_len to be the Ethernet header length, and set its
+     needed_headroom to be (the real WiFi header length - the fake Ethernet
+     header length).
    - packet socket receives packets with pulled ll header,
      so that SOCK_RAW should push it back.
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation
  2020-09-14  7:41 [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation Xie He
@ 2020-09-14  9:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
  2020-09-14 20:34 ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Willem de Bruijn @ 2020-09-14  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie He
  Cc: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Network Development, LKML,
	Eric Dumazet, Brian Norris, Cong Wang

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This comment is outdated and no longer reflects the actual implementation
> of af_packet.c.
>
> Reasons for the new comment:
>
> 1.
>
> In af_packet.c, the function packet_snd first reserves a headroom of
> length (dev->hard_header_len + dev->needed_headroom).
> Then if the socket is a SOCK_DGRAM socket, it calls dev_hard_header,
> which calls dev->header_ops->create, to create the link layer header.
> If the socket is a SOCK_RAW socket, it "un-reserves" a headroom of
> length (dev->hard_header_len), and checks if the user has provided a
> header sized between (dev->min_header_len) and (dev->hard_header_len)
> (in dev_validate_header).
> This shows the developers of af_packet.c expect hard_header_len to
> be consistent with header_ops.
>
> 2.
>
> In af_packet.c, the function packet_sendmsg_spkt has a FIXME comment.
> That comment states that prepending an LL header internally in a driver
> is considered a bug. I believe this bug can be fixed by setting
> hard_header_len to 0, making the internal header completely invisible
> to af_packet.c (and requesting the headroom in needed_headroom instead).
>
> 3.
>
> There is a commit for a WiFi driver:
> commit 9454f7a895b8 ("mwifiex: set needed_headroom, not hard_header_len")
> According to the discussion about it at:
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11407493/
> The author tried to set the WiFi driver's hard_header_len to the Ethernet
> header length, and request additional header space internally needed by
> setting needed_headroom.
> This means this usage is already adopted by driver developers.
>
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation
  2020-09-14  7:41 [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation Xie He
  2020-09-14  9:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
@ 2020-09-14 20:34 ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2020-09-14 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xie.he.0141
  Cc: kuba, netdev, linux-kernel, willemdebruijn.kernel, eric.dumazet,
	briannorris, xiyou.wangcong

From: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:41:54 -0700

> This comment is outdated and no longer reflects the actual implementation
> of af_packet.c.
> 
> Reasons for the new comment:
> 
> 1.
> 
> In af_packet.c, the function packet_snd first reserves a headroom of
> length (dev->hard_header_len + dev->needed_headroom).
> Then if the socket is a SOCK_DGRAM socket, it calls dev_hard_header,
> which calls dev->header_ops->create, to create the link layer header.
> If the socket is a SOCK_RAW socket, it "un-reserves" a headroom of
> length (dev->hard_header_len), and checks if the user has provided a
> header sized between (dev->min_header_len) and (dev->hard_header_len)
> (in dev_validate_header).
> This shows the developers of af_packet.c expect hard_header_len to
> be consistent with header_ops.
> 
> 2.
> 
> In af_packet.c, the function packet_sendmsg_spkt has a FIXME comment.
> That comment states that prepending an LL header internally in a driver
> is considered a bug. I believe this bug can be fixed by setting
> hard_header_len to 0, making the internal header completely invisible
> to af_packet.c (and requesting the headroom in needed_headroom instead).
> 
> 3.
> 
> There is a commit for a WiFi driver:
> commit 9454f7a895b8 ("mwifiex: set needed_headroom, not hard_header_len")
> According to the discussion about it at:
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11407493/
> The author tried to set the WiFi driver's hard_header_len to the Ethernet
> header length, and request additional header space internally needed by
> setting needed_headroom.
> This means this usage is already adopted by driver developers.
> 
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>

Applied, thank you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-14 20:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-14  7:41 [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Fix a comment about hard_header_len and headroom allocation Xie He
2020-09-14  9:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-14 20:34 ` David Miller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.