All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
@ 2020-03-08 13:06 Yoshinori Sato
  2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2020-03-08 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel, philmd; +Cc: peter.maydell, richard.henderson, Yoshinori Sato

Add rx-virt target specificaion document.

Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
---
 docs/system/target-rx.rst | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 docs/system/targets.rst   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 docs/system/target-rx.rst

diff --git a/docs/system/target-rx.rst b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8540fd5218
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+.. _RX-System-emulator:
+
+RX System emulator
+--------------------
+
+Use the executable ``qemu-system-rx`` to simulate a Virtual RX target.
+This target emulated following devices.
+
+-  R5F562N8 MCU
+
+   -  On-chip memory (ROM 512KB, RAM 96KB)
+   -  Interrupt Control Unit (ICUa)
+   -  8Bit Timer x 1CH (TMR0,1)
+   -  Compare Match Timer x 2CH (CMT0,1)
+   -  Serial Communication Interface x 1CH (SCI0)
+
+-  External memory 16MByte
+
+Example of ``qemu-system-rx`` usage for RX is shown below:
+
+Download ``<u-boot_image_file>`` from
+https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/u-boot.bin.gz
+
+Start emulation of rx-virt::
+  qemu-system-rx -bios <u-boot_image_file>
+
+Download ``kernel_image_file`` from
+https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/zImage
+
+Download ``device_tree_blob`` from
+https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/rx-virt.dtb
+
+Start emulation of rx-virt::
+  qemu-system-rx -kernel <kernel_image_file> -dtb <device_tree_blob> \
+      -append "earlycon"
diff --git a/docs/system/targets.rst b/docs/system/targets.rst
index eba3111247..946f513daa 100644
--- a/docs/system/targets.rst
+++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
@@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
    target-arm
    target-m68k
    target-xtensa
+   target-rx
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
  2020-03-08 13:06 [PATCH] docs: Add RX target Yoshinori Sato
@ 2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
  2020-03-10  4:28   ` Yoshinori Sato
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2020-03-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yoshinori Sato, qemu-devel, philmd; +Cc: peter.maydell, richard.henderson

On 3/8/20 8:06 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> Add rx-virt target specificaion document.

specification

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> ---
>   docs/system/target-rx.rst | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   docs/system/targets.rst   |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 docs/system/target-rx.rst
> 
> diff --git a/docs/system/target-rx.rst b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..8540fd5218
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +.. _RX-System-emulator:
> +
> +RX System emulator
> +--------------------
> +
> +Use the executable ``qemu-system-rx`` to simulate a Virtual RX target.
> +This target emulated following devices.

s/emulated/emulates the/


> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
>      target-arm
>      target-m68k
>      target-xtensa
> +   target-rx

Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
  2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
@ 2020-03-10  4:28   ` Yoshinori Sato
  2020-03-10 11:29     ` Eric Blake
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2020-03-10  4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Blake; +Cc: peter.maydell, richard.henderson, philmd, qemu-devel

2020-03-10 00:07 に Eric Blake さんは書きました:
> On 3/8/20 8:06 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>> Add rx-virt target specificaion document.
> 
> specification
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
>> ---
>>   docs/system/target-rx.rst | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   docs/system/targets.rst   |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 docs/system/target-rx.rst
>> 
>> diff --git a/docs/system/target-rx.rst b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..8540fd5218
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/docs/system/target-rx.rst
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +.. _RX-System-emulator:
>> +
>> +RX System emulator
>> +--------------------
>> +
>> +Use the executable ``qemu-system-rx`` to simulate a Virtual RX 
>> target.
>> +This target emulated following devices.
> 
> s/emulated/emulates the/
> 

OK. I'll fix it.

> 
>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
>>      target-arm
>>      target-m68k
>>      target-xtensa
>> +   target-rx
> 
> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?

It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better 
to arrange in alphabetical order?

---
Yoshinori Sato


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
  2020-03-10  4:28   ` Yoshinori Sato
@ 2020-03-10 11:29     ` Eric Blake
  2020-03-10 11:54       ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2020-03-10 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yoshinori Sato; +Cc: peter.maydell, richard.henderson, philmd, qemu-devel

On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:

>>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
>>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
>>>      target-arm
>>>      target-m68k
>>>      target-xtensa
>>> +   target-rx
>>
>> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?
> 
> It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better 
> to arrange in alphabetical order?

The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file, 
the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
  2020-03-10 11:29     ` Eric Blake
@ 2020-03-10 11:54       ` Peter Maydell
  2020-03-10 12:49         ` Yoshinori Sato
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2020-03-10 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Blake
  Cc: Richard Henderson, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé,
	QEMU Developers, Yoshinori Sato

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 11:30, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>
> >>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
> >>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
> >>>      target-arm
> >>>      target-m68k
> >>>      target-xtensa
> >>> +   target-rx
> >>
> >> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?
> >
> > It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better
> > to arrange in alphabetical order?
>
> The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file,
> the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all.

In an ideal world the correct order would probably be
"alphabetical order of the headline titles in the referenced
files", so that the displayed ToC is alphabetized.

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target.
  2020-03-10 11:54       ` Peter Maydell
@ 2020-03-10 12:49         ` Yoshinori Sato
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2020-03-10 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Maydell
  Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, Richard Henderson, QEMU Developers

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:54:16 +0900,
Peter Maydell wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 11:30, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> >
> > >>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst
> > >>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents:
> > >>>      target-arm
> > >>>      target-m68k
> > >>>      target-xtensa
> > >>> +   target-rx
> > >>
> > >> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted?
> > >
> > > It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better
> > > to arrange in alphabetical order?
> >
> > The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file,
> > the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all.
> 
> In an ideal world the correct order would probably be
> "alphabetical order of the headline titles in the referenced
> files", so that the displayed ToC is alphabetized.

OK.
Change to alphabetical order.

> thanks
> -- PMM

-- 
Yosinori Sato


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-10 12:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-08 13:06 [PATCH] docs: Add RX target Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-09 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10  4:28   ` Yoshinori Sato
2020-03-10 11:29     ` Eric Blake
2020-03-10 11:54       ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-10 12:49         ` Yoshinori Sato

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.