* Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
@ 2017-10-20 22:16 ` Casey Schaufler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2017-10-20 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module
The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
@ 2017-10-20 22:16 ` Casey Schaufler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2017-10-20 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore, Linux Audit, LSM
The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
2017-10-20 22:16 ` Casey Schaufler
@ 2017-10-21 1:05 ` William Roberts
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Roberts @ 2017-10-21 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
> made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
> It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
> removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
It seems to be unused...
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.14-rc5/ident/audit_log_secctx
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
--
Respectfully,
William C Roberts
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
@ 2017-10-21 1:05 ` William Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Roberts @ 2017-10-21 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler; +Cc: Paul Moore, Linux Audit, LSM
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
> made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
> It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
> removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
It seems to be unused...
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.14-rc5/ident/audit_log_secctx
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
--
Respectfully,
William C Roberts
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
2017-10-20 22:16 ` Casey Schaufler
@ 2017-10-23 23:14 ` Paul Moore
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2017-10-23 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-security-module
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
> made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
> It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
> removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
Removing code generally makes me happy. Send me a patch and I'll merge it.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Can we delete audit_log_secctx()?
@ 2017-10-23 23:14 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2017-10-23 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler; +Cc: Linux Audit, LSM
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> The function audit_log_secctx() is unused and cannot be
> made safe for the stacked/namespaced security module case.
> It, alas, shows up in the KAPI. Can this derelict code be
> removed? I'll provide a patch it it can go.
Removing code generally makes me happy. Send me a patch and I'll merge it.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-23 23:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-20 22:16 Can we delete audit_log_secctx()? Casey Schaufler
2017-10-20 22:16 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-21 1:05 ` William Roberts
2017-10-21 1:05 ` William Roberts
2017-10-23 23:14 ` Paul Moore
2017-10-23 23:14 ` Paul Moore
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.