All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:48:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQezGM7xgY2Q1RSUiQ7wLdxtUAeztrO3AqDfjx8f2kdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/19 at 04:20pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:31 PM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simple(char *cmdline,
> > > > >               pr_warn("crashkernel: unrecognized char: %c\n", *cur);
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (*crash_size = 0)
> > > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > This covers the case where I pass an argument like "crashkernel=0M" ?
> > > > Can't we fix that by using kstrtoull() in memparse and check if the return value
> > > > is < 0? In that case we could return without updating the retptr and we will be
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > > It seems that kstrtoull() treats 0M as invalid parameter, while
> > > simple_strtoull() does not.
> > >
> > > If changed like your suggestion, then all the callers of memparse()
> > > will treats 0M as invalid parameter. This affects many components
> > > besides kexec.  Not sure this can be done or not.
> >
> > simple_strtoull is obsolete, move to kstrtoull is the right way.
> >
> > $ git grep memparse|wc
> >     158     950   10479
> >
> > Except some documentation/tools etc there are still a log of callers
> > which directly use the return value as the ull number without error
> > checking.
> >
> > So it would be good to mark memparse as obsolete as well in
> > lib/cmdline.c, and introduce a new function eg. kmemparse() to use
> > kstrtoull,  and return a real error code, and save the size in an
> > argument like &size.  Then update X86 crashkernel code to use it.
> >
> Thank for your good suggestion.
>
Go through the v5.0 kernel code, I think it will be a huge job.

The difference between unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char
*cp, char **endp, unsigned int base) and int _kstrtoull(const char *s,
unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res) is bigger than expected,
especially the output parameter @res. Many references to
memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr) rely on @retptr to work. A
typical example from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
        mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
        if (p = oldp)
                return -EINVAL;

        userdef = 1;
        if (*p = '@') {  <----------- here
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM);
        } else if (*p = '#') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI);
        } else if (*p = '$') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
        }

So we need to resolve the prototype of kstrtoull() firstly, and maybe
kstrtouint() etc too. All of them have lots of references in kernel.

Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Pingfan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:48:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQezGM7xgY2Q1RSUiQ7wLdxtUAeztrO3AqDfjx8f2kdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/19 at 04:20pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:31 PM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simple(char *cmdline,
> > > > >               pr_warn("crashkernel: unrecognized char: %c\n", *cur);
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (*crash_size == 0)
> > > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > This covers the case where I pass an argument like "crashkernel=0M" ?
> > > > Can't we fix that by using kstrtoull() in memparse and check if the return value
> > > > is < 0? In that case we could return without updating the retptr and we will be
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > > It seems that kstrtoull() treats 0M as invalid parameter, while
> > > simple_strtoull() does not.
> > >
> > > If changed like your suggestion, then all the callers of memparse()
> > > will treats 0M as invalid parameter. This affects many components
> > > besides kexec.  Not sure this can be done or not.
> >
> > simple_strtoull is obsolete, move to kstrtoull is the right way.
> >
> > $ git grep memparse|wc
> >     158     950   10479
> >
> > Except some documentation/tools etc there are still a log of callers
> > which directly use the return value as the ull number without error
> > checking.
> >
> > So it would be good to mark memparse as obsolete as well in
> > lib/cmdline.c, and introduce a new function eg. kmemparse() to use
> > kstrtoull,  and return a real error code, and save the size in an
> > argument like &size.  Then update X86 crashkernel code to use it.
> >
> Thank for your good suggestion.
>
Go through the v5.0 kernel code, I think it will be a huge job.

The difference between unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char
*cp, char **endp, unsigned int base) and int _kstrtoull(const char *s,
unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res) is bigger than expected,
especially the output parameter @res. Many references to
memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr) rely on @retptr to work. A
typical example from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
        mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
        if (p == oldp)
                return -EINVAL;

        userdef = 1;
        if (*p == '@') {  <----------- here
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM);
        } else if (*p == '#') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI);
        } else if (*p == '$') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
        }

So we need to resolve the prototype of kstrtoull() firstly, and maybe
kstrtouint() etc too. All of them have lots of references in kernel.

Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Pingfan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:48:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQezGM7xgY2Q1RSUiQ7wLdxtUAeztrO3AqDfjx8f2kdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/19 at 04:20pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:31 PM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simple(char *cmdline,
> > > > >               pr_warn("crashkernel: unrecognized char: %c\n", *cur);
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (*crash_size == 0)
> > > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > This covers the case where I pass an argument like "crashkernel=0M" ?
> > > > Can't we fix that by using kstrtoull() in memparse and check if the return value
> > > > is < 0? In that case we could return without updating the retptr and we will be
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > > It seems that kstrtoull() treats 0M as invalid parameter, while
> > > simple_strtoull() does not.
> > >
> > > If changed like your suggestion, then all the callers of memparse()
> > > will treats 0M as invalid parameter. This affects many components
> > > besides kexec.  Not sure this can be done or not.
> >
> > simple_strtoull is obsolete, move to kstrtoull is the right way.
> >
> > $ git grep memparse|wc
> >     158     950   10479
> >
> > Except some documentation/tools etc there are still a log of callers
> > which directly use the return value as the ull number without error
> > checking.
> >
> > So it would be good to mark memparse as obsolete as well in
> > lib/cmdline.c, and introduce a new function eg. kmemparse() to use
> > kstrtoull,  and return a real error code, and save the size in an
> > argument like &size.  Then update X86 crashkernel code to use it.
> >
> Thank for your good suggestion.
>
Go through the v5.0 kernel code, I think it will be a huge job.

The difference between unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char
*cp, char **endp, unsigned int base) and int _kstrtoull(const char *s,
unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res) is bigger than expected,
especially the output parameter @res. Many references to
memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr) rely on @retptr to work. A
typical example from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
        mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
        if (p == oldp)
                return -EINVAL;

        userdef = 1;
        if (*p == '@') {  <----------- here
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM);
        } else if (*p == '#') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI);
        } else if (*p == '$') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
        }

So we need to resolve the prototype of kstrtoull() firstly, and maybe
kstrtouint() etc too. All of them have lots of references in kernel.

Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Pingfan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:48:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQezGM7xgY2Q1RSUiQ7wLdxtUAeztrO3AqDfjx8f2kdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/19 at 04:20pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:31 PM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simple(char *cmdline,
> > > > >               pr_warn("crashkernel: unrecognized char: %c\n", *cur);
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (*crash_size == 0)
> > > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > This covers the case where I pass an argument like "crashkernel=0M" ?
> > > > Can't we fix that by using kstrtoull() in memparse and check if the return value
> > > > is < 0? In that case we could return without updating the retptr and we will be
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > > It seems that kstrtoull() treats 0M as invalid parameter, while
> > > simple_strtoull() does not.
> > >
> > > If changed like your suggestion, then all the callers of memparse()
> > > will treats 0M as invalid parameter. This affects many components
> > > besides kexec.  Not sure this can be done or not.
> >
> > simple_strtoull is obsolete, move to kstrtoull is the right way.
> >
> > $ git grep memparse|wc
> >     158     950   10479
> >
> > Except some documentation/tools etc there are still a log of callers
> > which directly use the return value as the ull number without error
> > checking.
> >
> > So it would be good to mark memparse as obsolete as well in
> > lib/cmdline.c, and introduce a new function eg. kmemparse() to use
> > kstrtoull,  and return a real error code, and save the size in an
> > argument like &size.  Then update X86 crashkernel code to use it.
> >
> Thank for your good suggestion.
>
Go through the v5.0 kernel code, I think it will be a huge job.

The difference between unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char
*cp, char **endp, unsigned int base) and int _kstrtoull(const char *s,
unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res) is bigger than expected,
especially the output parameter @res. Many references to
memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr) rely on @retptr to work. A
typical example from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
        mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
        if (p == oldp)
                return -EINVAL;

        userdef = 1;
        if (*p == '@') {  <----------- here
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM);
        } else if (*p == '#') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI);
        } else if (*p == '$') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
        }

So we need to resolve the prototype of kstrtoull() firstly, and maybe
kstrtouint() etc too. All of them have lots of references in kernel.

Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Pingfan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:48:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTvQezGM7xgY2Q1RSUiQ7wLdxtUAeztrO3AqDfjx8f2kdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:37 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/19 at 04:20pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:31 PM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simple(char *cmdline,
> > > > >               pr_warn("crashkernel: unrecognized char: %c\n", *cur);
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (*crash_size == 0)
> > > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > This covers the case where I pass an argument like "crashkernel=0M" ?
> > > > Can't we fix that by using kstrtoull() in memparse and check if the return value
> > > > is < 0? In that case we could return without updating the retptr and we will be
> > > > fine.
> > > >
> > > It seems that kstrtoull() treats 0M as invalid parameter, while
> > > simple_strtoull() does not.
> > >
> > > If changed like your suggestion, then all the callers of memparse()
> > > will treats 0M as invalid parameter. This affects many components
> > > besides kexec.  Not sure this can be done or not.
> >
> > simple_strtoull is obsolete, move to kstrtoull is the right way.
> >
> > $ git grep memparse|wc
> >     158     950   10479
> >
> > Except some documentation/tools etc there are still a log of callers
> > which directly use the return value as the ull number without error
> > checking.
> >
> > So it would be good to mark memparse as obsolete as well in
> > lib/cmdline.c, and introduce a new function eg. kmemparse() to use
> > kstrtoull,  and return a real error code, and save the size in an
> > argument like &size.  Then update X86 crashkernel code to use it.
> >
> Thank for your good suggestion.
>
Go through the v5.0 kernel code, I think it will be a huge job.

The difference between unsigned long long simple_strtoull(const char
*cp, char **endp, unsigned int base) and int _kstrtoull(const char *s,
unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res) is bigger than expected,
especially the output parameter @res. Many references to
memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr) rely on @retptr to work. A
typical example from arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
        mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
        if (p == oldp)
                return -EINVAL;

        userdef = 1;
        if (*p == '@') {  <----------- here
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RAM);
        } else if (*p == '#') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI);
        } else if (*p == '$') {
                start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
                e820__range_add(start_at, mem_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
        }

So we need to resolve the prototype of kstrtoull() firstly, and maybe
kstrtouint() etc too. All of them have lots of references in kernel.

Any idea about this?

Thanks,
Pingfan

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-29  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24  6:33 [PATCHv2] kernel/crash: make parse_crashkernel()'s return value more indicant Pingfan Liu
2019-04-24  6:33 ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-24  6:33 ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-24  6:33 ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-24  8:31 ` Matthias Brugger
2019-04-24  8:31   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-04-24  8:31   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-04-24  8:31   ` Matthias Brugger
2019-04-25  8:20   ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-28  8:37     ` Dave Young
2019-04-28  8:37       ` Dave Young
2019-04-28  8:37       ` Dave Young
2019-04-28  8:37       ` Dave Young
2019-04-28  8:37       ` Dave Young
2019-04-29  3:04       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  3:04         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  3:04         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  3:04         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  3:04         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  4:48         ` Pingfan Liu [this message]
2019-04-29  4:48           ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  4:48           ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  4:48           ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  4:48           ` Pingfan Liu
2019-04-29  5:04           ` Dave Young
2019-04-29  5:04             ` Dave Young
2019-04-29  5:04             ` Dave Young
2019-04-29  5:04             ` Dave Young
2019-04-29  5:04             ` Dave Young
2019-05-02  6:22     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-02  6:22       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-02  6:22       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-02  6:22       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-24  3:11       ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-24  3:11         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-24  3:11         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-05-24  3:11         ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFgQCTszGixzH5ZrwOzjbp7W91Wxo3XvA+EeEx0ErVVcYMr0FA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ghackmann@android.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.