Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

[Tolga Ceylan]

Quick question about how to submit patches and proofs. Are separate
emails OK with this? For example;

1) a "formal" kernel patch submitted via git send-email
2) proof e-mail submitted via replying to the original task email

Or should the proof be in the git commit description itself?

Cheers,
Tolga

Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

[Tolga Ceylan]

I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge.

Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail
for proof and another kernel patch e-mail...

I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in
kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you
who are taking this challenge...

I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system
takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's
no outlet for process related questions such as mine below.

All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch
itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails.

It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related
questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email.

Cheers,
Tolga


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM
Subject: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)
To: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org>


Quick question about how to submit patches and proofs. Are separate
emails OK with this? For example;

1) a "formal" kernel patch submitted via git send-email
2) proof e-mail submitted via replying to the original task email

Or should the proof be in the git commit description itself?

Cheers,
Tolga

Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

[Jerry Snitselaar]

On 2015-02-02 13:03 MST, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge.
>
> Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail
> for proof and another kernel patch e-mail...
>
> I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in
> kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you
> who are taking this challenge...
>
> I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system
> takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's
> no outlet for process related questions such as mine below.
>
> All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch
> itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails.
>
> It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related
> questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email.
>
> Cheers,
> Tolga

Did you try emailing little with the process questions? Process
questions should get answered there as well as questions regarding
the tasks. It might take some time to get a response, but eventually
you will.

Regards,
Jerry

Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

[sanjeev sharma]

Hello All,

Please follow some useful information here
https://sanjeevsharmaengg.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/begineers-guide-configure-thunderbird-account-for-eudyptula-challenge/

IMO,Always summit the patch & proof in single email only but make sure
below note.




*Note:Remember to use your ID assigned to you in the Subject: line when
responding to this task, so that Penguin can figure it out to whom this
task assigned in his List.*

*RegardsSanjeev Sharma*

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jerry Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org> wrote:

>
> On 2015-02-02 13:03 MST, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge.
> >
> > Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail
> > for proof and another kernel patch e-mail...
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in
> > kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you
> > who are taking this challenge...
> >
> > I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system
> > takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's
> > no outlet for process related questions such as mine below.
> >
> > All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch
> > itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails.
> >
> > It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related
> > questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tolga
>
> Did you try emailing little with the process questions? Process
> questions should get answered there as well as questions regarding
> the tasks. It might take some time to get a response, but eventually
> you will.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20150204/bdea2609/attachment.html