All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	"Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:30:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+D=zs8AMb969dhH05GmKPuBxKPcAs89KfKzVf47faL1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwbO2vUsjWzAwB6SZ65RM4r3P0+2JvyMHn=ry0CgWCBgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> I wonder which gcc versions actually accept Kees's addition.

Ah, my old nemesis, gcc 4.4.4. *sob*

> Note that we already do have this pattern, as seen by:
>
>   git grep -2  __builtin_choose_expr | grep -2 __builtin_constant_p
>
> which show drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h, so the pattern
> already exists current kernels and _works_ - it apparently just
> doesn't work in slightly more complicated cases.

Fun. Yeah, so all the PIN_GROUP() callers have either a literal or an
array name for that argument, so the argument to
__builtin_constant_p() isn't complex.

git grep '\bPIN_GROUP\b' | egrep -v '(1|2|3|true|false)\)'

> It's one reason why I wondered if simplifying the expression to have
> just that single __builtin_constant_p() might not end up working..

Yeah, it seems like it doesn't bail out as "false" for complex
expressions given to __builtin_constant_p().

If no magic solution, then which of these?

- go back to my original "multi-eval max only for constants" macro (meh)
- add gcc version checks around this and similarly for -Wvla in the future (eww)
- raise gcc version (yikes)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On
Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Linus Torvalds <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
href="mailto:torvalds@linux-foundation.org"
target="_blank">torvalds@linux-foundation.org</a>&gt;</span>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On
Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton &lt;<a
href="mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org">akpm@linux-foundation.org</a>&gt;
wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I wonder which gcc versions actually accept Kees's addition.<br>
<br>
</span>Note that we already do have this pattern, as seen by:<br>
<br>
&nbsp; git grep -2&nbsp; __builtin_choose_expr | grep -2
__builtin_constant_p<br>
<br>
which show drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-<wbr>intel.h, so the pattern<br>
already exists current kernels and _works_ - it apparently just<br>
doesn't work in slightly more complicated cases.<br>
<br>
It's one reason why I wondered if simplifying the expression to have<br>
just that single __builtin_constant_p() might not end up working..<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Linus<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>--
<br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Kees
Cook<br>Pixel Security</div>
</div>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	"Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:30:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+D=zs8AMb969dhH05GmKPuBxKPcAs89KfKzVf47faL1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwbO2vUsjWzAwB6SZ65RM4r3P0+2JvyMHn=ry0CgWCBgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> I wonder which gcc versions actually accept Kees's addition.

Ah, my old nemesis, gcc 4.4.4. *sob*

> Note that we already do have this pattern, as seen by:
>
>   git grep -2  __builtin_choose_expr | grep -2 __builtin_constant_p
>
> which show drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h, so the pattern
> already exists current kernels and _works_ - it apparently just
> doesn't work in slightly more complicated cases.

Fun. Yeah, so all the PIN_GROUP() callers have either a literal or an
array name for that argument, so the argument to
__builtin_constant_p() isn't complex.

git grep '\bPIN_GROUP\b' | egrep -v '(1|2|3|true|false)\)'

> It's one reason why I wondered if simplifying the expression to have
> just that single __builtin_constant_p() might not end up working..

Yeah, it seems like it doesn't bail out as "false" for complex
expressions given to __builtin_constant_p().

If no magic solution, then which of these?

- go back to my original "multi-eval max only for constants" macro (meh)
- add gcc version checks around this and similarly for -Wvla in the future (eww)
- raise gcc version (yikes)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On
Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Linus Torvalds <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
href="mailto:torvalds@linux-foundation.org"
target="_blank">torvalds@linux-foundation.org</a>&gt;</span>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On
Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton &lt;<a
href="mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org">akpm@linux-foundation.org</a>&gt;
wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I wonder which gcc versions actually accept Kees's addition.<br>
<br>
</span>Note that we already do have this pattern, as seen by:<br>
<br>
&nbsp; git grep -2&nbsp; __builtin_choose_expr | grep -2
__builtin_constant_p<br>
<br>
which show drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-<wbr>intel.h, so the pattern<br>
already exists current kernels and _works_ - it apparently just<br>
doesn't work in slightly more complicated cases.<br>
<br>
It's one reason why I wondered if simplifying the expression to have<br>
just that single __builtin_constant_p() might not end up working..<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Linus<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>--
<br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Kees
Cook<br>Pixel Security</div>
</div>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-10  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-09 20:05 [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max() Kees Cook
2018-03-09 20:05 ` Kees Cook
2018-03-09 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-09 21:10   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-09 21:47   ` Kees Cook
2018-03-09 21:47     ` Kees Cook
2018-03-11 22:46   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-03-11 22:46     ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-03-11 22:46     ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-03-13 13:31   ` David Laight
2018-03-13 13:31     ` David Laight
2018-03-10  0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-10  0:07   ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-10  0:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  0:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  0:32     ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-10  0:32       ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-10  0:38       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  0:38         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  1:30         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2018-03-10  1:30           ` Kees Cook
2018-03-10  1:31           ` Kees Cook
2018-03-10  1:31             ` Kees Cook
2018-03-10  2:37             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  2:37               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-12 22:55           ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-12 22:55             ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-12 23:57             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-12 23:57               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-13  4:28               ` Kees Cook
2018-03-13  4:28                 ` Kees Cook
2018-03-13 21:02                 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-13 21:02                   ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-13 22:14                   ` Kees Cook
2018-03-13 22:14                     ` Kees Cook
2018-03-14 11:35                     ` David Laight
2018-03-14 11:35                       ` David Laight
2018-03-10  3:11   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-03-10  3:11     ` Randy Dunlap
2018-03-10  6:10     ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10  6:10       ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10  7:03       ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10  7:03         ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10 16:04         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 16:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 15:33       ` Kees Cook
2018-03-10 15:33         ` Kees Cook
2018-03-10 16:11         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 16:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 16:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 16:30           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 17:34           ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10 17:34             ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10 17:51             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 17:51               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10 19:08               ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-10 19:08                 ` Miguel Ojeda
2018-03-11 11:05               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 11:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 18:23                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-11 18:23                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-10  2:34 [PATCH 0/3] tracing: Rewrite the function filter code Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  2:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] tracing: Combine enum and arrays into single macro in " Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 10:31   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  2:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Clean up and document pred_funcs_##type creation and use Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 13:42   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  2:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Rewrite filter logic to be simpler and faster Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:10   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:10     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:15       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10  3:18   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 12:42   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-12 18:38     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 15:10   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-12 18:40     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 18:54       ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-12 19:10         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-12 23:52         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-13 10:14           ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-13 14:12             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-13 14:27               ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-11 19:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] tracing: Rewrite the function filter code Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5j+D=zs8AMb969dhH05GmKPuBxKPcAs89KfKzVf47faL1g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.