All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/1] drivers: net: cpsw: Add default vlan for dual emac case also
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 10:58:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm1_kvHRx61i1fKywAdySOB0vk03E+PDsD23W89UHihoRmM7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGm1_ktSCZLa2-vyeP2nygcKwrXgkyoXs94TSx=tY-HrOsZmKQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Yegor Yefremov
<yegorslists@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 15 April 2014 07:16 PM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:56 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>>> From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:34:40 +0530
>>>>
>>>>> Dual EMAC works with VLAN segregation of the ports, so default vlan needs
>>>>> to be added in dual EMAC case else default vlan will be tagged for all
>>>>> egress packets and vlan unaware switches/servers will drop packets
>>>>> from the EVM.
>>> Hi Mugunthan,
>>>
>>> though this patch fixes drop packets issue, it introduces another
>>> issue. Just connect both interfaces to one switch and configure
>>> different subnets. As soon as you get a broadcast you have an endless
>>> loop and network communication is not possible at all. Before this
>>> patch you could operate as if you had really two independent NICs.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This patch doesn't add any multicast or unicast entry in the ALE table,
>> so there is no possible way that a broadcast packet is switched within
>> the two external ports, and this patch removes the encapsulation of the
>> default vlan id which is used for internal packet switching inside CPSW
>> switch from host and any packet received from external port will be
>> tagged with port vlan so internal switching will happen with that port
>> vlan-id which will be only that physical port and host port. so the
>> scenario which you mentioned cannot happen theoretically untill you
>> enable bridge between the dual ethernet interface and connect both to
>> the same interface.
>
> Have you tried the described setup? My system is Buildroot on
> am335x-evmsk with almost empty /etc/network/interfaces
>
> # Configure Loopback
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> No bridges:
>
> # brctl show
> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>
> And following address setup made manually:
>
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> group default
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:18:31:93:f6:49 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.1.234/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 3: eth1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state DOWN group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 56:90:76:5b:b5:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.4.234/24 brd 192.168.4.255 scope global eth1
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 4: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
> default qlen 1000
>     link/ether de:ad:be:ef:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> Routing table:
>
> # ip route show
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.234
> 192.168.4.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.4.234
>
> Same behavior on 3.14.0-rc4-12740-gcc09039-dirty and 3.15.0-rc1-00002-ge0f8779
>
> As soon as insert the cable into eth1, my switch shows very high
> activity and the whole LAN in the company is dead till I remove the
> cable. I have no problems with the version before the fix. I don't
> really know, what happens inside the driver, but could make the same
> setup (best of all in a LAN with many Windows PCs, that send lots of
> broadcast) and let me know if you see the same behavior.

This bug seems to be in 3.12 too. See this thread
(http://e2e.ti.com/support/arm/sitara_arm/f/791/p/338292/1180954.aspx#1180954).

Thanks.

Yegor

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-02  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-09  6:04 [net PATCH 1/1] drivers: net: cpsw: Add default vlan for dual emac case also Mugunthan V N
2014-04-09 13:42 ` Yegor Yefremov
2014-04-09 18:56 ` David Miller
2014-04-15 13:46   ` Yegor Yefremov
2014-04-16  5:57     ` Mugunthan V N
2014-04-16 13:58       ` Yegor Yefremov
2014-05-02  8:58         ` Yegor Yefremov [this message]
2014-05-05 14:20           ` Mugunthan V N
2014-05-19  8:46             ` Yegor Yefremov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGm1_kvHRx61i1fKywAdySOB0vk03E+PDsD23W89UHihoRmM7g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.