[GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Sven Van Asbroeck]

The following changes since commit a4965d98b4d1ffa5b22f2039bc9e87898aff4976:

  staging: comedi: comedi_isadma: Use a non-NULL device for DMA API (2019-04-27 15:00:35 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git@gitlab.com:TheSven73/linux.git tags/fieldbus-dev-for-5.2

for you to fetch changes up to 7721d1955e07f42670ea761a37b5661626b75891:

  staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: fix wait_for_completion_timeout return handling (2019-04-29 09:35:19 -0400)

----------------------------------------------------------------
staging/fieldbus-dev patch for v5.2

This contains just a single, non-critical bugfix.
It has been tested on real hardware.

Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>

----------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholas Mc Guire (1):
      staging: fieldbus: anybus-s: fix wait_for_completion_timeout return handling

 drivers/staging/fieldbus/anybuss/host.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Greg KH]

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:06:24AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> The following changes since commit a4965d98b4d1ffa5b22f2039bc9e87898aff4976:
> 
>   staging: comedi: comedi_isadma: Use a non-NULL device for DMA API (2019-04-27 15:00:35 +0200)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   git@gitlab.com:TheSven73/linux.git tags/fieldbus-dev-for-5.2

I don't "trust" the gitlab infrastructure, sorry, and I don't think I
have a valid gpg signature from you anywhere :(

Can you just send these as patches?  I can easily queue them up that
way.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Greg KH]

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:06:24AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> > The following changes since commit a4965d98b4d1ffa5b22f2039bc9e87898aff4976:
> > 
> >   staging: comedi: comedi_isadma: Use a non-NULL device for DMA API (2019-04-27 15:00:35 +0200)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git@gitlab.com:TheSven73/linux.git tags/fieldbus-dev-for-5.2
> 
> I don't "trust" the gitlab infrastructure, sorry, and I don't think I
> have a valid gpg signature from you anywhere :(
> 
> Can you just send these as patches?  I can easily queue them up that
> way.

And as this is just a single patch, handling them as patches is much
easier anyway.  Only when you get into the 20+ at a time does pull
requests help.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Sven Van Asbroeck]

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:24 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> And as this is just a single patch, handling them as patches is much
> easier anyway.  Only when you get into the 20+ at a time does pull
> requests help.
>

Patches are much easier for me too, but I assumed this had to be done via a
pull request.

How do you distinguish between a patch that's still spinning on the
mailing list,
and one coming from my next tree? The Reviewed-by or Acked-by tag?

Patch coming up, thanks :)

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Sven Van Asbroeck]

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:23 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I don't "trust" the gitlab infrastructure, sorry, and I don't think I
> have a valid gpg signature from you anywhere :(

What infrastructure do you trust? GitHub?
Just in case I need this in the future - I really don't want to start
a political thread :)

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Greg KH]

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:30:06AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:24 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > And as this is just a single patch, handling them as patches is much
> > easier anyway.  Only when you get into the 20+ at a time does pull
> > requests help.
> >
> 
> Patches are much easier for me too, but I assumed this had to be done via a
> pull request.
> 
> How do you distinguish between a patch that's still spinning on the
> mailing list,
> and one coming from my next tree? The Reviewed-by or Acked-by tag?

If you forward it on, I trust that one :)

But for cleanup stuff, I'll take them from anyone usually, that's what
staging is there for.  I can wait until I see a reviewed or acked tag
from you before queueing it up, if you want me to.  I do that for some
portions of staging today as the maintainers of those areas want a
chance to test/review it.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Greg KH]

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:33:28AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:23 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't "trust" the gitlab infrastructure, sorry, and I don't think I
> > have a valid gpg signature from you anywhere :(
> 
> What infrastructure do you trust? GitHub?

Hahahahahahaha

Ah, good one...

No, definitely not gihub :(

I "trust" git.kernel.org and sometimes one other system (whatever the
drm developers use).

> Just in case I need this in the future - I really don't want to start
> a political thread :)

If you want a kernel.org account, so that you can have a development
tree there for future work, I suggest you apply for one.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [GIT PULL] staging/fieldbus-dev for 5.2

[Sven Van Asbroeck]

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > What infrastructure do you trust? GitHub?
>
> Hahahahahahaha

Okay, maybe I wasn't completely innocent when I suggested
that one :)

>
> If you want a kernel.org account, so that you can have a development
> tree there for future work, I suggest you apply for one.
>

I will, thank you for the suggestion !