* FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
@ 2018-02-12 21:13 Paul Moore
2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2018-02-12 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: selinux
A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the selinux/next
branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be working
through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP work.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
2018-02-12 21:13 FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1 Paul Moore
@ 2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Haines @ 2018-02-13 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore, linux-sctp; +Cc: selinux
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the selinux/next
> branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
> working
> through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP work.
>
I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many updates
since kernel 4.14.
The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I also
added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version" [1]
patch as well.
It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can finally ok
them (or not).
[1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m\x151061619115945&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
@ 2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Haines @ 2018-02-13 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore, linux-sctp; +Cc: selinux
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the selinux/next
> branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
> working
> through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP work.
>
I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many updates
since kernel 4.14.
The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I also
added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version" [1]
patch as well.
It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can finally ok
them (or not).
[1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
@ 2018-02-13 17:55 ` Paul Moore
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2018-02-13 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Haines; +Cc: linux-sctp, selinux
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Richard Haines
<richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the selinux/next
>> branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
>> working
>> through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP work.
>>
>
> I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
>
> kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
>
> I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
> specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many updates
> since kernel 4.14.
>
> The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I also
> added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version" [1]
> patch as well.
>
> It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can finally ok
> them (or not).
If you don't mind doing the rebase that would be helpful. We'll have
to wait and see what the changes look like, but I don't expect there
to be a problem with the SCTP folks, Marcelo has been very helpful
thus far.
As far as the NetLabel patch is concerned, yes, go ahead and include
that in the patchset.
Thanks!
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m\x151061619115945&w=2
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
@ 2018-02-13 17:55 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2018-02-13 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Haines; +Cc: linux-sctp, selinux
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Richard Haines
<richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the selinux/next
>> branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
>> working
>> through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP work.
>>
>
> I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
>
> kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
>
> I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
> specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many updates
> since kernel 4.14.
>
> The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I also
> added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version" [1]
> patch as well.
>
> It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can finally ok
> them (or not).
If you don't mind doing the rebase that would be helpful. We'll have
to wait and see what the changes look like, but I don't expect there
to be a problem with the SCTP folks, Marcelo has been very helpful
thus far.
As far as the NetLabel patch is concerned, yes, go ahead and include
that in the patchset.
Thanks!
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
2018-02-13 17:55 ` Paul Moore
@ 2018-02-13 22:06 ` Richard Haines
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Haines @ 2018-02-13 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: linux-sctp, selinux
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:55 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Richard Haines
> <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the
> > > selinux/next
> > > branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
> > > working
> > > through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP
> > > work.
> > >
> >
> > I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
> >
> > kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
> >
> > I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
> > specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many
> > updates
> > since kernel 4.14.
> >
> > The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I
> > also
> > added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version"
> > [1]
> > patch as well.
> >
> > It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can
> > finally ok
> > them (or not).
>
> If you don't mind doing the rebase that would be helpful. We'll have
> to wait and see what the changes look like, but I don't expect there
> to be a problem with the SCTP folks, Marcelo has been very helpful
> thus far.
>
> As far as the NetLabel patch is concerned, yes, go ahead and include
> that in the patchset.
I did not include the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header
version" [1] in the final V6 patches as it was the only one that did
not require a rebase, therefore [1] can still go standalone in kernel
4.16
>
> Thanks!
>
> > [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m\x151061619115945&w=2
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1
@ 2018-02-13 22:06 ` Richard Haines
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Haines @ 2018-02-13 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: linux-sctp, selinux
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:55 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Richard Haines
> <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the
> > > selinux/next
> > > branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
> > > working
> > > through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP
> > > work.
> > >
> >
> > I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
> >
> > kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
> >
> > I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
> > specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many
> > updates
> > since kernel 4.14.
> >
> > The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I
> > also
> > added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version"
> > [1]
> > patch as well.
> >
> > It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can
> > finally ok
> > them (or not).
>
> If you don't mind doing the rebase that would be helpful. We'll have
> to wait and see what the changes look like, but I don't expect there
> to be a problem with the SCTP folks, Marcelo has been very helpful
> thus far.
>
> As far as the NetLabel patch is concerned, yes, go ahead and include
> that in the patchset.
I did not include the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header
version" [1] in the final V6 patches as it was the only one that did
not require a rebase, therefore [1] can still go standalone in kernel
4.16
>
> Thanks!
>
> > [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-13 22:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-12 21:13 FYI: selinux/next rebased to v4.16-rc1 Paul Moore
2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
2018-02-13 16:22 ` Richard Haines
2018-02-13 17:55 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-13 17:55 ` Paul Moore
2018-02-13 22:06 ` Richard Haines
2018-02-13 22:06 ` Richard Haines
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.