All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:47:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTkXaJ6nsJU9hf9KO22bGSpyr8EeBQKef-f6jhy_6OEkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310234632.16194-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:59 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
> a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
> to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
> will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
> with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
> records (none are currently defined) as have been added
> to the list.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index f012c3786264..4713e66a12af 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
>   * to place it on a transmit queue.  Multiple audit_buffers can be in
>   * use simultaneously. */
>  struct audit_buffer {
> -       struct sk_buff       *skb;      /* formatted skb ready to send */
> +       struct sk_buff       *skb;      /* the skb for audit_log functions */
> +       struct sk_buff_head  skb_list;  /* formatted skbs, ready to send */
>         struct audit_context *ctx;      /* NULL or associated context */
> +       struct audit_stamp   stamp;     /* audit stamp for these records */
>         gfp_t                gfp_mask;
>  };
>
> @@ -1744,7 +1746,6 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>         if (!ab)
>                 return;
>
> -       kfree_skb(ab->skb);

I like the safety in knowing that audit_buffer_free() would free the
ab->skb memory, I'm not sure I want to get rid of that.  With the
understanding that ab->skb is always going to be present somewhere in
ab->skb_list, any reason not to do something like this?

  while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
    kfree_skb(skb);

>         kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
>  }
>
> @@ -1760,11 +1761,15 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
>         ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
>         if (!ab->skb)
>                 goto err;
> -       if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> +       if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0)) {
> +               kfree_skb(ab->skb);
>                 goto err;
> +       }

Assuming we restore the audit_buffer_free() functionality as mentioned
above, if we move the ab->skb_list init and enqueue calls before we
attempt the nlmsg_put() we can drop the kfree_skb() call and just use
the existing audit_buffer_free() call at the err target.


>         ab->ctx = ctx;
>         ab->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
> +       skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
> +       skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
>
>         return ab;
>

--
paul-moore.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:47:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTkXaJ6nsJU9hf9KO22bGSpyr8EeBQKef-f6jhy_6OEkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310234632.16194-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:59 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
> a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
> to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
> will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
> with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
> records (none are currently defined) as have been added
> to the list.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index f012c3786264..4713e66a12af 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
>   * to place it on a transmit queue.  Multiple audit_buffers can be in
>   * use simultaneously. */
>  struct audit_buffer {
> -       struct sk_buff       *skb;      /* formatted skb ready to send */
> +       struct sk_buff       *skb;      /* the skb for audit_log functions */
> +       struct sk_buff_head  skb_list;  /* formatted skbs, ready to send */
>         struct audit_context *ctx;      /* NULL or associated context */
> +       struct audit_stamp   stamp;     /* audit stamp for these records */
>         gfp_t                gfp_mask;
>  };
>
> @@ -1744,7 +1746,6 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>         if (!ab)
>                 return;
>
> -       kfree_skb(ab->skb);

I like the safety in knowing that audit_buffer_free() would free the
ab->skb memory, I'm not sure I want to get rid of that.  With the
understanding that ab->skb is always going to be present somewhere in
ab->skb_list, any reason not to do something like this?

  while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
    kfree_skb(skb);

>         kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
>  }
>
> @@ -1760,11 +1761,15 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
>         ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
>         if (!ab->skb)
>                 goto err;
> -       if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> +       if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0)) {
> +               kfree_skb(ab->skb);
>                 goto err;
> +       }

Assuming we restore the audit_buffer_free() functionality as mentioned
above, if we move the ab->skb_list init and enqueue calls before we
attempt the nlmsg_put() we can drop the kfree_skb() call and just use
the existing audit_buffer_free() call at the err target.


>         ab->ctx = ctx;
>         ab->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
> +       skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
> +       skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
>
>         return ab;
>

--
paul-moore.com

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-15 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220310234632.16194-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-11 10:48     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 10:48       ` kernel test robot
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-11  7:52     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11  7:52       ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11  9:16     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11  9:16       ` kernel test robot
2022-03-12  4:50     ` kernel test robot
2022-03-12  4:50       ` kernel test robot
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-15 23:47     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2022-03-15 23:47       ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16  0:06       ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-16  0:06         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-15 23:47     ` Paul Moore
2022-03-15 23:47       ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16  0:17       ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-16  0:17         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-15 23:47     ` Paul Moore
2022-03-15 23:47       ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16  0:23       ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-16  0:23         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-16  1:08         ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16  1:08           ` Paul Moore
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46   ` [PATCH v33 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46     ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHC9VhTkXaJ6nsJU9hf9KO22bGSpyr8EeBQKef-f6jhy_6OEkA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.