Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL

[Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [190912 19:00]:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM André Roth <neolynx@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > >
> > > Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
> > > Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
> > > default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
> > > and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
> > > the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
> > > ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
> > > the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> >
> > Tony,
> >
> > Is there a status update on this series?  It's been several months,
> > and I haven't seen any feedback on it, nor does it appear to be in any
> > of your branches that I can see.
>
> Well it was tagged RFC.. Does something need updating
> with it?

I didn't notice the RTC until you pointed out the 0/3 file showed the RFC.

Andre -  since you have sign-off by various TI people and Tony seems
satisfied, would you be will to re-base and push the patch series
without the RFC?

I think some of the work that H Nikolaus Schaller is doing will
benefit from this.

Thank you,

adam
>
> At least the first two patches looked OK to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel