All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules
@ 2021-10-02  3:31 Ajay Garg
  2021-10-02  4:33 ` Randy Dunlap
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ajay Garg @ 2021-10-02  3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-pci

Hello All,

Let's say, I want to make a simple printk change to drivers/pci/bus.c,
compile it, load it, test it.

Now, since bus.o is built as a result of CONFIG_PCI=y in
drivers/pci/Makefile, so this module is statically built, and as a
result doing a "make M=drivers/pci" does-not-pick-up-the-change /
have-any-effect.

Doing a simple "make" takes too long, everytime for even a trivial change.


So, what is the recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules?


Will be grateful for pointers.


Thanks and Regards,
Ajay

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules
  2021-10-02  3:31 Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules Ajay Garg
@ 2021-10-02  4:33 ` Randy Dunlap
  2021-10-02  4:37   ` Ajay Garg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2021-10-02  4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ajay Garg, linux-kernel, linux-pci

On 10/1/21 8:31 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> Let's say, I want to make a simple printk change to drivers/pci/bus.c,
> compile it, load it, test it.
> 
> Now, since bus.o is built as a result of CONFIG_PCI=y in
> drivers/pci/Makefile, so this module is statically built, and as a
> result doing a "make M=drivers/pci" does-not-pick-up-the-change /
> have-any-effect.
> 
> Doing a simple "make" takes too long, everytime for even a trivial change.
> 
> 
> So, what is the recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules?
> 
> 
> Will be grateful for pointers.

Just to build drivers/pci/bus.o, you do
$ make drivers/pci/bus.o

That will tell you if you have any build errors/warnings.

For run-time testing, AFAIK you don't have any choice but to
build a full kernel and boot it.

-- 
~Randy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules
  2021-10-02  4:33 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2021-10-02  4:37   ` Ajay Garg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ajay Garg @ 2021-10-02  4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci

Thanks Randy.

On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 10:03 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/1/21 8:31 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Let's say, I want to make a simple printk change to drivers/pci/bus.c,
> > compile it, load it, test it.
> >
> > Now, since bus.o is built as a result of CONFIG_PCI=y in
> > drivers/pci/Makefile, so this module is statically built, and as a
> > result doing a "make M=drivers/pci" does-not-pick-up-the-change /
> > have-any-effect.
> >
> > Doing a simple "make" takes too long, everytime for even a trivial change.
> >
> >
> > So, what is the recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules?
> >
> >
> > Will be grateful for pointers.
>
> Just to build drivers/pci/bus.o, you do
> $ make drivers/pci/bus.o
>
> That will tell you if you have any build errors/warnings.
>
> For run-time testing, AFAIK you don't have any choice but to
> build a full kernel and boot it.
>
> --
> ~Randy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-02  4:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-02  3:31 Recommended way to do kernel-development for static modules Ajay Garg
2021-10-02  4:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-02  4:37   ` Ajay Garg

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.