All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
	"ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/4 V2] ocfs2: use retval instead of status for checking error
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:22:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHb8M2AXygqC5tJZrE7qKu_9+0rB4qzQFvM5uAR9F80X01Rx8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550A6BB3.5000901@huawei.com>

2015-03-19 15:24 GMT+09:00 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On 2015/2/28 7:48, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> The use of 'status' in __ocfs2_add_entry() can return wrong
>> status when some functions are failed.
>>
>> If ocfs2_journal_access_db() in __ocfs2_add_entry() is failed,
>> that status is saved to 'status' but return variable is 'retval'
>> which is saved 'success' status. In case of this,  __ocfs2_add_entry()
>> is failed but can be returned as 'success'.
>>
>> So replace 'status' with 'retval'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Hi, Joseph.

Thanks for review this patch. I have actually tried to set this file
system on my machine with qemu but I didn't success, yet.

Regards,
Daeseok Youn.

>> ---
>> V2 : update changelog
>>
>>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c |   12 ++++++------
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> index b08050b..1478a50 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>>       struct ocfs2_dir_entry *de, *de1;
>>       struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)parent_fe_bh->b_data;
>>       struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
>> -     int retval, status;
>> +     int retval;
>>       unsigned int size = sb->s_blocksize;
>>       struct buffer_head *insert_bh = lookup->dl_leaf_bh;
>>       char *data_start = insert_bh->b_data;
>> @@ -1695,22 +1695,22 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>>                       }
>>
>>                       if (insert_bh == parent_fe_bh)
>> -                             status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
>> +                             retval = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
>>                                                                INODE_CACHE(dir),
>>                                                                insert_bh,
>>                                                                OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>                       else {
>> -                             status = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
>> +                             retval = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
>>                                                                INODE_CACHE(dir),
>>                                                                insert_bh,
>>                                             OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>
>>                               if (ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir)) {
>> -                                     status = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>> +                                     retval = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>>                                                               handle,
>>                                                               lookup);
>> -                                     if (status) {
>> -                                             mlog_errno(status);
>> +                                     if (retval) {
>> +                                             mlog_errno(retval);
>>                                               goto bail;
>>                                       }
>>                               }
>>
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
	"ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/4 V2] ocfs2: use retval instead of status for checking error
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:22:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHb8M2AXygqC5tJZrE7qKu_9+0rB4qzQFvM5uAR9F80X01Rx8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550A6BB3.5000901@huawei.com>

2015-03-19 15:24 GMT+09:00 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On 2015/2/28 7:48, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> The use of 'status' in __ocfs2_add_entry() can return wrong
>> status when some functions are failed.
>>
>> If ocfs2_journal_access_db() in __ocfs2_add_entry() is failed,
>> that status is saved to 'status' but return variable is 'retval'
>> which is saved 'success' status. In case of this,  __ocfs2_add_entry()
>> is failed but can be returned as 'success'.
>>
>> So replace 'status' with 'retval'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Hi, Joseph.

Thanks for review this patch. I have actually tried to set this file
system on my machine with qemu but I didn't success, yet.

Regards,
Daeseok Youn.

>> ---
>> V2 : update changelog
>>
>>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c |   12 ++++++------
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> index b08050b..1478a50 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>>       struct ocfs2_dir_entry *de, *de1;
>>       struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)parent_fe_bh->b_data;
>>       struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
>> -     int retval, status;
>> +     int retval;
>>       unsigned int size = sb->s_blocksize;
>>       struct buffer_head *insert_bh = lookup->dl_leaf_bh;
>>       char *data_start = insert_bh->b_data;
>> @@ -1695,22 +1695,22 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>>                       }
>>
>>                       if (insert_bh == parent_fe_bh)
>> -                             status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
>> +                             retval = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
>>                                                                INODE_CACHE(dir),
>>                                                                insert_bh,
>>                                                                OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>                       else {
>> -                             status = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
>> +                             retval = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
>>                                                                INODE_CACHE(dir),
>>                                                                insert_bh,
>>                                             OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>
>>                               if (ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir)) {
>> -                                     status = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>> +                                     retval = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>>                                                               handle,
>>                                                               lookup);
>> -                                     if (status) {
>> -                                             mlog_errno(status);
>> +                                     if (retval) {
>> +                                             mlog_errno(retval);
>>                                               goto bail;
>>                                       }
>>                               }
>>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-27 23:48 [PATCH 1/4 V2] ocfs2: use retval instead of status for checking error Daeseok Youn
2015-02-27 23:48 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Daeseok Youn
2015-03-02  9:04 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-03-02  9:04   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2015-03-03  1:38   ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-03  1:38     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-05  9:36     ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-05  9:36       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-13  3:59 ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-13  3:59   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-13  8:15   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-03-13  8:15     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2015-03-13 11:14     ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-19  6:24 ` Joseph Qi
2015-03-19  6:24   ` Joseph Qi
2015-03-20  2:22   ` DaeSeok Youn [this message]
2015-03-20  2:22     ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-19 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-19 22:23   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2015-03-20  1:17   ` Joseph Qi
2015-03-20  1:17     ` Joseph Qi
2015-03-24  6:17     ` DaeSeok Youn
2015-03-24  6:17       ` DaeSeok Youn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHb8M2AXygqC5tJZrE7qKu_9+0rB4qzQFvM5uAR9F80X01Rx8A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.