All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* WireGuard for 5.5?
@ 2019-11-27 10:11 Jason A. Donenfeld
  2019-11-27 18:55 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2019-11-27 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Netdev, David Miller; +Cc: LKML, Linus Torvalds

Hey Dave,

It looks like Frankenzinc has landed in Herbert's crypto-2.6.git tree,
and he'll be pushing to Linus quite soon. The fact that there are two
separate trees means that I've missed your net-next cut this Monday,
due to waiting for these pieces to be in place. But I was wondering if
we could do some juggling so that WireGuard doesn't take ~135 days
from now to be released in 5.6, but rather sooner in 5.5. I suspect
this would entail: Herbert pushes to Linus, you pull from Linus, I
submit on top of your tree, you push back to Linus. I realize that
this isn't the ordinary procedure, and if you prefer to do things in
the ordinary way, that's fine and I understand. But in case you're as
excited as I am about getting WireGuard out the door at long last,
maybe we can try to handle this cross-tree situation with
crypto-2.6.git?

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: WireGuard for 5.5?
  2019-11-27 10:11 WireGuard for 5.5? Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2019-11-27 18:55 ` David Miller
  2019-11-28 12:47   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2019-11-27 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, torvalds


I haven't read the patch and plan to do so soon.

The merge window is open and thus net-next is closed, so we can put
this into the next merge window.

Thank you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: WireGuard for 5.5?
  2019-11-27 18:55 ` David Miller
@ 2019-11-28 12:47   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2019-11-28 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: Netdev, LKML, Linus Torvalds

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:55 PM David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> I haven't read the patch and plan to do so soon.
>
> The merge window is open and thus net-next is closed, so we can put
> this into the next merge window.

Okay, no problem. That means 5.6. If there are comments on the v1 I
sent, I'll send the v2 when net-next is actually open, per the norm.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-28 12:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-27 10:11 WireGuard for 5.5? Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-11-27 18:55 ` David Miller
2019-11-28 12:47   ` Jason A. Donenfeld

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.