From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: dillon.minfei@gmail.com
Cc: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@tronnes.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:16:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc5fJM-UiBiosAiTraq=6P0AFefmw1rmtFcvyWVb6rfLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1627098243-2742-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 AM <dillon.minfei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
>
> Since the st,sf-tc240t-9370-t dts binding already exist in stm32f429-disco.dts
> but, the panel driver didn't get accepted from mainline. it's time to submit
> patch fot it.
>
> This driver can support two different interface by different dts bindings:
> - spi+dpi, use spi to configure register, dpi for graphic data.
> st,sf-tc240t-9370-t
> - only spi, just like tiny/ili9341.c (actually, this part is copy from tiny)
> adafruit,yx240qv29
...
> I was submited the first patch last year, you can find it at [1].
submitted
> this patch has one major difference from that one, which is replace the low
> level communication way, from spi_sync() to mipi_dbi_{command,
> command_stackbuf}() interface, referred from Linus's patch [2].
Can you shed a light on the road map here.
I have the SPI panel (tiny) based on the ILI9341 and I'm using
actually mi0283qt driver. With yours we will have 3 (three!) drivers
for the same chip. I really do not want this. Without road map on the
prospective of these all drivers, NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: dillon.minfei@gmail.com
Cc: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@tronnes.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:16:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc5fJM-UiBiosAiTraq=6P0AFefmw1rmtFcvyWVb6rfLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1627098243-2742-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 AM <dillon.minfei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
>
> Since the st,sf-tc240t-9370-t dts binding already exist in stm32f429-disco.dts
> but, the panel driver didn't get accepted from mainline. it's time to submit
> patch fot it.
>
> This driver can support two different interface by different dts bindings:
> - spi+dpi, use spi to configure register, dpi for graphic data.
> st,sf-tc240t-9370-t
> - only spi, just like tiny/ili9341.c (actually, this part is copy from tiny)
> adafruit,yx240qv29
...
> I was submited the first patch last year, you can find it at [1].
submitted
> this patch has one major difference from that one, which is replace the low
> level communication way, from spi_sync() to mipi_dbi_{command,
> command_stackbuf}() interface, referred from Linus's patch [2].
Can you shed a light on the road map here.
I have the SPI panel (tiny) based on the ILI9341 and I'm using
actually mi0283qt driver. With yours we will have 3 (three!) drivers
for the same chip. I really do not want this. Without road map on the
prospective of these all drivers, NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:16:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc5fJM-UiBiosAiTraq=6P0AFefmw1rmtFcvyWVb6rfLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1627098243-2742-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 AM <dillon.minfei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
>
> Since the st,sf-tc240t-9370-t dts binding already exist in stm32f429-disco.dts
> but, the panel driver didn't get accepted from mainline. it's time to submit
> patch fot it.
>
> This driver can support two different interface by different dts bindings:
> - spi+dpi, use spi to configure register, dpi for graphic data.
> st,sf-tc240t-9370-t
> - only spi, just like tiny/ili9341.c (actually, this part is copy from tiny)
> adafruit,yx240qv29
...
> I was submited the first patch last year, you can find it at [1].
submitted
> this patch has one major difference from that one, which is replace the low
> level communication way, from spi_sync() to mipi_dbi_{command,
> command_stackbuf}() interface, referred from Linus's patch [2].
Can you shed a light on the road map here.
I have the SPI panel (tiny) based on the ILI9341 and I'm using
actually mi0283qt driver. With yours we will have 3 (three!) drivers
for the same chip. I really do not want this. Without road map on the
prospective of these all drivers, NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 3:44 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add ilitek ili9341 panel bindings dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-08-05 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-24 3:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: dts: stm32: fix dtbs_check warning on ili9341 dts binding dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-08-05 9:11 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:11 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:11 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:19 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 9:19 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 9:19 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 9:19 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 9:37 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-08-05 9:37 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-08-05 9:37 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-11-25 14:52 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-11-25 14:52 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-11-25 14:52 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-11-25 14:52 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2021-07-24 3:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/panel: Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-07-24 3:44 ` dillon.minfei
2021-08-05 9:10 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:10 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 9:10 ` Linus Walleij
2021-08-05 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Dillon Min
2021-08-05 8:55 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 8:55 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 8:55 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 10:16 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-08-05 10:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-05 10:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-05 10:42 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 10:42 ` Dillon Min
2021-08-05 10:42 ` Dillon Min
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHp75Vc5fJM-UiBiosAiTraq=6P0AFefmw1rmtFcvyWVb6rfLA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillon.minfei@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=noralf@tronnes.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.