Re: [PATCH] acpi: add support for extended IRQ to PCI link

From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: add support for extended IRQ to PCI link
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:17:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcU5xjMB4-=Q1fkRM9Z6v+=EKwgi+_Uk8-RoKQLu3VTNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5644AA63.2070205@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 4:56 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> -       if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) {
>>> +       if ((acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) && (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)) {
>>>                 /*
>>
>>> -                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to promote
>>> -                * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>>> +                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to
>>> +                * promote the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>>
>> What was changed here?
>
> See your comments here.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/231

So, you refer to narrow commentary blocks, right?
It was about *new* code, leave as is what was before your patch series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko