All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
	"apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org"
	<driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"marcelo.cerri@canonical.com" <marcelo.cerri@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Do not wait forever on a device that has disappeared
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 00:20:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd9kiyOaSbaK6c4b7ucF23kgP0yQxKpUAGrjHgKfJprXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <KL1P15301MB0006DF4209AEE3809ABD303FBF6B0@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Before the guest finishes the device initialization, the device can be
> removed anytime by the host, and after that the host won't respond to
> the guest's request, so the guest should be prepared to handle this
> case.

> +       while (true) {
> +               if (hdev->channel->rescind) {
> +                       dev_warn_once(&hdev->device, "The device is gone.\n");
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (wait_for_completion_timeout(comp, HZ / 10))
> +                       break;
> +       }

Infinite loops are usually a red flags.

What's wrong with simple:

do {
  ...
} while (wait_...(...) == 0);

?

> +       if (!ret)
> +               ret = wait_for_response(hdev, &comp);

Better to use well established patterns, i.e.

if (ret)
 return ret;

> +               if (!ret)
> +                       ret = wait_for_response(hdev, &comp_pkt.host_event);

Here it looks okay on the first glance, but better to think about it
again and refactor.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: "olaf@aepfle.de" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org"
	<driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"marcelo.cerri@canonical.com" <marcelo.cerri@canonical.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Do not wait forever on a device that has disappeared
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 00:20:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd9kiyOaSbaK6c4b7ucF23kgP0yQxKpUAGrjHgKfJprXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <KL1P15301MB0006DF4209AEE3809ABD303FBF6B0@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Before the guest finishes the device initialization, the device can be
> removed anytime by the host, and after that the host won't respond to
> the guest's request, so the guest should be prepared to handle this
> case.

> +       while (true) {
> +               if (hdev->channel->rescind) {
> +                       dev_warn_once(&hdev->device, "The device is gone.\n");
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (wait_for_completion_timeout(comp, HZ / 10))
> +                       break;
> +       }

Infinite loops are usually a red flags.

What's wrong with simple:

do {
  ...
} while (wait_...(...) == 0);

?

> +       if (!ret)
> +               ret = wait_for_response(hdev, &comp);

Better to use well established patterns, i.e.

if (ret)
 return ret;

> +               if (!ret)
> +                       ret = wait_for_response(hdev, &comp_pkt.host_event);

Here it looks okay on the first glance, but better to think about it
again and refactor.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-29 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23 21:12 [PATCH] PCI: hv: Do not wait forever on a device that has disappeared Dexuan Cui
2018-05-23 21:12 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-24 12:41 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-24 12:41   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-24 23:55   ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-24 23:55     ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-24 23:55     ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-25 10:29     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-25 10:29       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-25 11:43 ` Haiyang Zhang
2018-05-25 11:43   ` Haiyang Zhang
2018-05-25 11:43   ` Haiyang Zhang
2018-05-25 13:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-25 13:56   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-29  0:19 ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-29  0:19   ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-29  0:19   ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-29 19:58   ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-29 19:58     ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-29 19:58     ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-31 16:40     ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-31 16:40       ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-31 16:40       ` Michael Kelley (EOSG)
2018-05-31 21:01       ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-31 21:01         ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-31 21:01         ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-29 21:20 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2018-05-29 21:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-05-29 21:28   ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-29 21:28     ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-29 21:28     ` Dexuan Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHp75Vd9kiyOaSbaK6c4b7ucF23kgP0yQxKpUAGrjHgKfJprXA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.