From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: debugfs var for the default aggregation timeout. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:32:57 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAHqTa-3VtwYWLUHQuFyqtmMwPE2XQYJD4-U+-1PqXKtmTFrEgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1459928436.17504.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 19:46 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: > >> This test was with backports-20150525 on ath9k. (We have newer >> versions in the queue, but they haven't rolled out to our customers >> yet. Anyway, earlier in this thread, I was able to trigger the race >> condition on much newer backports. Unfortunately the current fix >> makes my reproducible test case go away, but I don't know any reason >> to assume the race condition is fixed.) > > Well, we know that the timeout is likely unrelated to the issue (other > than not triggering the broken code path that frequently), so you can > revert the timeout change for the test case. Yes. And I can make it happen more often by making it timeout the aggregation agreement much more frequently than usual. >> While we're here, unfortunately it turns out that just observing the >> agg_status file can cause crashes (though not very often... except >> for a few unlucky customers), probably due to a different race >> condition. >> Any suggestions about this one? Stack trace attached below. (I >> think the stack trace suggests a mac80211 problem?) > > That has to be a mac80211 problem, yeah. > (Side note: I'm a bit surprised this is a 32-bit system?) We're going for all of good, fast, and cheap here. That should end well :) > Looks like we use RCU protection to get the data. Can I get the > mac80211.ko binary (with debug data) corresponding to the crash below? Yes. Here it is: http://apenwarr.ca/tmp/mac80211-agg-status-crash.ko Thanks for your help!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] mac80211: debugfs var for the default aggregation timeout. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:32:57 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAHqTa-3VtwYWLUHQuFyqtmMwPE2XQYJD4-U+-1PqXKtmTFrEgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1459928436.17504.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 19:46 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: > >> This test was with backports-20150525 on ath9k. (We have newer >> versions in the queue, but they haven't rolled out to our customers >> yet. Anyway, earlier in this thread, I was able to trigger the race >> condition on much newer backports. Unfortunately the current fix >> makes my reproducible test case go away, but I don't know any reason >> to assume the race condition is fixed.) > > Well, we know that the timeout is likely unrelated to the issue (other > than not triggering the broken code path that frequently), so you can > revert the timeout change for the test case. Yes. And I can make it happen more often by making it timeout the aggregation agreement much more frequently than usual. >> While we're here, unfortunately it turns out that just observing the >> agg_status file can cause crashes (though not very often... except >> for a few unlucky customers), probably due to a different race >> condition. >> Any suggestions about this one? Stack trace attached below. (I >> think the stack trace suggests a mac80211 problem?) > > That has to be a mac80211 problem, yeah. > (Side note: I'm a bit surprised this is a 32-bit system?) We're going for all of good, fast, and cheap here. That should end well :) > Looks like we use RCU protection to get the data. Can I get the > mac80211.ko binary (with debug data) corresponding to the crash below? Yes. Here it is: http://apenwarr.ca/tmp/mac80211-agg-status-crash.ko Thanks for your help!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 1:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-11-04 5:03 ath9k(?): AP stops sending traffic to iPhone 4S until another 802.11n-capable STA joins Avery Pennarun 2016-02-16 21:28 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-02-16 21:28 ` [PATCH] mac80211: debugfs var for the default aggregation timeout Avery Pennarun 2016-02-16 21:44 ` Johannes Berg 2016-02-17 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan 2016-02-23 10:14 ` Johannes Berg 2016-02-23 18:43 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-02-23 20:05 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-05 23:46 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-04-05 23:46 ` [ath9k-devel] " Avery Pennarun 2016-04-06 7:40 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-06 7:40 ` [ath9k-devel] " Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 1:32 ` Avery Pennarun [this message] 2016-04-08 1:32 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-04-08 6:56 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 6:56 ` [ath9k-devel] " Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 7:01 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 7:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 7:15 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 7:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Johannes Berg 2016-04-08 8:31 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-04-08 8:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Avery Pennarun 2016-04-09 1:27 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-04-09 1:27 ` [ath9k-devel] " Avery Pennarun 2016-04-09 4:56 ` Johannes Berg 2016-04-09 4:56 ` [ath9k-devel] " Johannes Berg 2016-04-10 0:31 ` Adrian Chadd 2016-04-10 0:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd 2016-04-10 1:59 ` bruce m beach 2016-04-10 2:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " bruce m beach 2016-04-19 1:29 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-04-19 1:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Avery Pennarun 2016-02-16 22:05 ` ath9k(?): AP stops sending traffic to iPhone 4S until another 802.11n-capable STA joins Johannes Berg 2016-02-17 4:32 ` Avery Pennarun 2016-02-17 6:23 ` Krishna Chaitanya 2016-02-17 7:05 ` Avery Pennarun
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAHqTa-3VtwYWLUHQuFyqtmMwPE2XQYJD4-U+-1PqXKtmTFrEgA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=apenwarr@gmail.com \ --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \ --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nbd@nbd.name \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.