All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	ciara.loftus@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:29:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNjC6Rd_eK3Uw=QynfhEc1n8Bm-3RZrTywXMMeTWjNsMjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620090958.2135-7-kevin.laatz@intel.com>

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 19:25, Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
> restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
> example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be placed
> at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie. every 2k starting from 0).
>
> This patch introduces the ability to use unaligned chunks. With these
> changes, we are no longer bound to having to place chunks at a 2k (or
> whatever your chunk size is) interval. Since we are no longer dealing with
> aligned chunks, they can now cross page boundaries. Checks for page
> contiguity have been added in order to keep track of which pages are
> followed by a physically contiguous page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/net/xdp_sock.h      |  2 ++
>  include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h |  4 +++
>  net/xdp/xdp_umem.c          | 17 +++++++----
>  net/xdp/xsk.c               | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  net/xdp/xsk_queue.h         | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> index ae0f368a62bb..c07977e271c4 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct xsk_queue;
>  struct xdp_umem_page {
>         void *addr;
>         dma_addr_t dma;
> +       bool next_pg_contig;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_umem_fq_reuse {
> @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct xdp_umem {
>         bool zc;
>         spinlock_t xsk_list_lock;
>         struct list_head xsk_list;
> +       u32 flags;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_sock {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> index caed8b1614ff..8548f2110a77 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
>  #define XDP_COPY       (1 << 1) /* Force copy-mode */
>  #define XDP_ZEROCOPY   (1 << 2) /* Force zero-copy mode */
>
> +/* Flags for xsk_umem_config flags */
> +#define XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS (1 << 0)
> +
>  struct sockaddr_xdp {
>         __u16 sxdp_family;
>         __u16 sxdp_flags;
> @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ struct xdp_umem_reg {
>         __u64 len; /* Length of packet data area */
>         __u32 chunk_size;
>         __u32 headroom;
> +       __u32 flags;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_statistics {
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index 2b18223e7eb8..4d4782572855 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -301,12 +301,14 @@ static int xdp_umem_account_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem)
>
>  static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>  {
> +       bool unaligned_chunks = mr->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS;

You need to validate the flags field from userland, i.e. check for
unknown flags.

Also, headroom != 0 doesn't make sense in the unaligned chunks case,
right? Perhaps add a check that rejects headroom != 0 for the unaliged
case?

>         u32 chunk_size = mr->chunk_size, headroom = mr->headroom;
>         unsigned int chunks, chunks_per_page;
>         u64 addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len;
>         int size_chk, err, i;
>
> -       if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
> +       if ((!unaligned_chunks && chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE) ||

Hmm, so the chunk_size is the "buffer length" in the unaligned chunks
case. Any reason to relax (and allow) chunk_size==0? Is there a need
for the extra !unaligned_chunks check here?

> +                       chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
>                 /* Strictly speaking we could support this, if:
>                  * - huge pages, or*
>                  * - using an IOMMU, or
> @@ -316,7 +318,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> -       if (!is_power_of_2(chunk_size))
> +       if (!unaligned_chunks && !is_power_of_2(chunk_size))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr)) {
> @@ -333,9 +335,11 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>         if (chunks == 0)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       chunks_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / chunk_size;
> -       if (chunks < chunks_per_page || chunks % chunks_per_page)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (!unaligned_chunks) {
> +               chunks_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / chunk_size;
> +               if (chunks < chunks_per_page || chunks % chunks_per_page)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +       }
>
>         headroom = ALIGN(headroom, 64);
>
> @@ -344,13 +348,14 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         umem->address = (unsigned long)addr;
> -       umem->chunk_mask = ~((u64)chunk_size - 1);
> +       umem->chunk_mask = unaligned_chunks ? U64_MAX : ~((u64)chunk_size - 1);

Now that chunk_mask can be "invalid", xsk_diag.c needs a change as
well, since the mask is used to get the size. I suggest using
chunk_size_nohr and headroom in xsk_diag.c

Related, are you using chunk_mask at all in the unaligned-paths
(probably, right)?

>         umem->size = size;
>         umem->headroom = headroom;
>         umem->chunk_size_nohr = chunk_size - headroom;
>         umem->npgs = size / PAGE_SIZE;
>         umem->pgs = NULL;
>         umem->user = NULL;
> +       umem->flags = mr->flags;
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&umem->xsk_list);
>         spin_lock_init(&umem->xsk_list_lock);
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index a14e8864e4fa..dfae19942b70 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ bool xsk_is_setup_for_bpf_map(struct xdp_sock *xs)
>
>  u64 *xsk_umem_peek_addr(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 *addr)
>  {
> -       return xskq_peek_addr(umem->fq, addr);
> +       return xskq_peek_addr(umem->fq, addr, umem);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_umem_peek_addr);
>
> @@ -49,14 +49,36 @@ void xsk_umem_discard_addr(struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_umem_discard_addr);
>
> +/* If a buffer crosses a page boundary, we need to do 2 memcpy's, one for
> + * each page. This is only required in copy mode.
> + */
> +static void __xsk_rcv_memcpy(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 addr, void *from_buf,
> +               u32 len, u32 metalen)
> +{
> +       void *to_buf = xdp_umem_get_data(umem, addr);
> +
> +       if (xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(umem, addr)) {
> +               void *next_pg_addr = umem->pages[(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)+1].addr;
> +               u64 page_start = addr & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
> +               u64 first_len = PAGE_SIZE - (addr - page_start);
> +
> +               memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, first_len + metalen);
> +               memcpy(next_pg_addr, from_buf + first_len, len - first_len);
> +
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, len + metalen);
> +}
> +
>  static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
>  {
> -       void *to_buf, *from_buf;
> +       void *from_buf;
>         u32 metalen;
>         u64 addr;
>         int err;
>
> -       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr) ||
> +       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr, xs->umem) ||
>             len > xs->umem->chunk_size_nohr - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
>                 xs->rx_dropped++;
>                 return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -72,8 +94,8 @@ static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
>                 metalen = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
>         }
>
> -       to_buf = xdp_umem_get_data(xs->umem, addr);
> -       memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, len + metalen);
> +       __xsk_rcv_memcpy(xs->umem, addr, from_buf, len, metalen);
> +
>         addr += metalen;
>         err = xskq_produce_batch_desc(xs->rx, addr, len);
>         if (!err) {
> @@ -126,7 +148,7 @@ int xsk_generic_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>         if (xs->dev != xdp->rxq->dev || xs->queue_id != xdp->rxq->queue_index)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr) ||
> +       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr, xs->umem) ||
>             len > xs->umem->chunk_size_nohr - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
>                 xs->rx_dropped++;
>                 return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -173,7 +195,7 @@ bool xsk_umem_consume_tx(struct xdp_umem *umem, dma_addr_t *dma, u32 *len)
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
>         list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &umem->xsk_list, list) {
> -               if (!xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc))
> +               if (!xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, umem))
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (xskq_produce_addr_lazy(umem->cq, desc.addr))
> @@ -226,7 +248,7 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *m,
>
>         mutex_lock(&xs->mutex);
>
> -       while (xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc)) {
> +       while (xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->umem)) {
>                 char *buffer;
>                 u64 addr;
>                 u32 len;
> @@ -393,6 +415,26 @@ static struct socket *xsk_lookup_xsk_from_fd(int fd)
>         return sock;
>  }
>
> +/* Check if umem pages are contiguous.
> + * If zero-copy mode, use the DMA address to do the page contiguity check
> + * For all other modes we use addr (kernel virtual address)
> + */
> +static void xsk_check_page_contiguity(struct xdp_umem *umem, u32 flags)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       if (flags & XDP_ZEROCOPY) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < umem->npgs-1; i++)
> +                       umem->pages[i].next_pg_contig =
> +                                       (umem->pages[i].dma + PAGE_SIZE == umem->pages[i+1].dma);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < umem->npgs-1; i++)
> +               umem->pages[i].next_pg_contig =
> +                               (umem->pages[i].addr + PAGE_SIZE == umem->pages[i+1].addr);
> +}
> +
>  static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
>  {
>         struct sockaddr_xdp *sxdp = (struct sockaddr_xdp *)addr;
> @@ -480,6 +522,8 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
>                 err = xdp_umem_assign_dev(xs->umem, dev, qid, flags);
>                 if (err)
>                         goto out_unlock;
> +
> +               xsk_check_page_contiguity(xs->umem, flags);
>         }
>
>         xs->dev = dev;
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index 88b9ae24658d..c2676a1df938 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ static inline u32 xskq_nb_free(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 producer, u32 dcnt)
>
>  /* UMEM queue */
>
> +static inline bool xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 addr)
> +{
> +       bool cross_pg = (addr & (PAGE_SIZE-1)) + umem->chunk_size_nohr > PAGE_SIZE;
> +       bool next_pg_contig = umem->pages[(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)+1].next_pg_contig;
> +
> +       return cross_pg && !next_pg_contig;
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>  {
>         if (addr >= q->size) {
> @@ -129,23 +137,44 @@ static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -static inline u64 *xskq_validate_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
> +static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
> +{
> +       if (addr >= q->size ||
> +                       xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(umem, addr)) {
> +               q->invalid_descs++;
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 *xskq_validate_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         while (q->cons_tail != q->cons_head) {
>                 struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
>                 unsigned int idx = q->cons_tail & q->ring_mask;
>
>                 *addr = READ_ONCE(ring->desc[idx]) & q->chunk_mask;
> +               if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS) {
> +                       if (xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(q, *addr, umem))
> +                               return addr;
> +                       goto out;
> +               }
> +
>                 if (xskq_is_valid_addr(q, *addr))
>                         return addr;
>
> +out:
>                 q->cons_tail++;
>         }
>
>         return NULL;
>  }
>
> -static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
> +static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         if (q->cons_tail == q->cons_head) {
>                 smp_mb(); /* D, matches A */
> @@ -156,7 +185,7 @@ static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
>                 smp_rmb();
>         }
>
> -       return xskq_validate_addr(q, addr);
> +       return xskq_validate_addr(q, addr, umem);
>  }
>
>  static inline void xskq_discard_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
> @@ -215,8 +244,21 @@ static inline int xskq_reserve_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
>
>  /* Rx/Tx queue */
>
> -static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d)
> +static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d,
> +                                                  struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
> +       if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS) {
> +               if (!xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(q, d->addr, umem))
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               if ((d->len > umem->chunk_size_nohr) || d->options) {
> +                       q->invalid_descs++;
> +                       return false;
> +               }
> +
> +               return true;
> +       }
> +
>         if (!xskq_is_valid_addr(q, d->addr))
>                 return false;
>
> @@ -230,14 +272,15 @@ static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d)
>  }
>
>  static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_validate_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
> -                                                 struct xdp_desc *desc)
> +                                                 struct xdp_desc *desc,
> +                                                 struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         while (q->cons_tail != q->cons_head) {
>                 struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
>                 unsigned int idx = q->cons_tail & q->ring_mask;
>
>                 *desc = READ_ONCE(ring->desc[idx]);
> -               if (xskq_is_valid_desc(q, desc))
> +               if (xskq_is_valid_desc(q, desc, umem))
>                         return desc;
>
>                 q->cons_tail++;
> @@ -247,7 +290,8 @@ static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_validate_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
>  }
>
>  static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_peek_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
> -                                             struct xdp_desc *desc)
> +                                             struct xdp_desc *desc,
> +                                             struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         if (q->cons_tail == q->cons_head) {
>                 smp_mb(); /* D, matches A */
> @@ -258,7 +302,7 @@ static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_peek_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
>                 smp_rmb(); /* C, matches B */
>         }
>
> -       return xskq_validate_desc(q, desc);
> +       return xskq_validate_desc(q, desc, umem);
>  }
>
>  static inline void xskq_discard_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 06/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:29:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNjC6Rd_eK3Uw=QynfhEc1n8Bm-3RZrTywXMMeTWjNsMjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620090958.2135-7-kevin.laatz@intel.com>

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 19:25, Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
> restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
> example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be placed
> at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie. every 2k starting from 0).
>
> This patch introduces the ability to use unaligned chunks. With these
> changes, we are no longer bound to having to place chunks at a 2k (or
> whatever your chunk size is) interval. Since we are no longer dealing with
> aligned chunks, they can now cross page boundaries. Checks for page
> contiguity have been added in order to keep track of which pages are
> followed by a physically contiguous page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/net/xdp_sock.h      |  2 ++
>  include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h |  4 +++
>  net/xdp/xdp_umem.c          | 17 +++++++----
>  net/xdp/xsk.c               | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  net/xdp/xsk_queue.h         | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> index ae0f368a62bb..c07977e271c4 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct xsk_queue;
>  struct xdp_umem_page {
>         void *addr;
>         dma_addr_t dma;
> +       bool next_pg_contig;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_umem_fq_reuse {
> @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct xdp_umem {
>         bool zc;
>         spinlock_t xsk_list_lock;
>         struct list_head xsk_list;
> +       u32 flags;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_sock {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> index caed8b1614ff..8548f2110a77 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
>  #define XDP_COPY       (1 << 1) /* Force copy-mode */
>  #define XDP_ZEROCOPY   (1 << 2) /* Force zero-copy mode */
>
> +/* Flags for xsk_umem_config flags */
> +#define XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS (1 << 0)
> +
>  struct sockaddr_xdp {
>         __u16 sxdp_family;
>         __u16 sxdp_flags;
> @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ struct xdp_umem_reg {
>         __u64 len; /* Length of packet data area */
>         __u32 chunk_size;
>         __u32 headroom;
> +       __u32 flags;
>  };
>
>  struct xdp_statistics {
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index 2b18223e7eb8..4d4782572855 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -301,12 +301,14 @@ static int xdp_umem_account_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem)
>
>  static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>  {
> +       bool unaligned_chunks = mr->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS;

You need to validate the flags field from userland, i.e. check for
unknown flags.

Also, headroom != 0 doesn't make sense in the unaligned chunks case,
right? Perhaps add a check that rejects headroom != 0 for the unaliged
case?

>         u32 chunk_size = mr->chunk_size, headroom = mr->headroom;
>         unsigned int chunks, chunks_per_page;
>         u64 addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len;
>         int size_chk, err, i;
>
> -       if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
> +       if ((!unaligned_chunks && chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE) ||

Hmm, so the chunk_size is the "buffer length" in the unaligned chunks
case. Any reason to relax (and allow) chunk_size==0? Is there a need
for the extra !unaligned_chunks check here?

> +                       chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
>                 /* Strictly speaking we could support this, if:
>                  * - huge pages, or*
>                  * - using an IOMMU, or
> @@ -316,7 +318,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> -       if (!is_power_of_2(chunk_size))
> +       if (!unaligned_chunks && !is_power_of_2(chunk_size))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr)) {
> @@ -333,9 +335,11 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>         if (chunks == 0)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       chunks_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / chunk_size;
> -       if (chunks < chunks_per_page || chunks % chunks_per_page)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (!unaligned_chunks) {
> +               chunks_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / chunk_size;
> +               if (chunks < chunks_per_page || chunks % chunks_per_page)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +       }
>
>         headroom = ALIGN(headroom, 64);
>
> @@ -344,13 +348,14 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         umem->address = (unsigned long)addr;
> -       umem->chunk_mask = ~((u64)chunk_size - 1);
> +       umem->chunk_mask = unaligned_chunks ? U64_MAX : ~((u64)chunk_size - 1);

Now that chunk_mask can be "invalid", xsk_diag.c needs a change as
well, since the mask is used to get the size. I suggest using
chunk_size_nohr and headroom in xsk_diag.c

Related, are you using chunk_mask at all in the unaligned-paths
(probably, right)?

>         umem->size = size;
>         umem->headroom = headroom;
>         umem->chunk_size_nohr = chunk_size - headroom;
>         umem->npgs = size / PAGE_SIZE;
>         umem->pgs = NULL;
>         umem->user = NULL;
> +       umem->flags = mr->flags;
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&umem->xsk_list);
>         spin_lock_init(&umem->xsk_list_lock);
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index a14e8864e4fa..dfae19942b70 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ bool xsk_is_setup_for_bpf_map(struct xdp_sock *xs)
>
>  u64 *xsk_umem_peek_addr(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 *addr)
>  {
> -       return xskq_peek_addr(umem->fq, addr);
> +       return xskq_peek_addr(umem->fq, addr, umem);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_umem_peek_addr);
>
> @@ -49,14 +49,36 @@ void xsk_umem_discard_addr(struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_umem_discard_addr);
>
> +/* If a buffer crosses a page boundary, we need to do 2 memcpy's, one for
> + * each page. This is only required in copy mode.
> + */
> +static void __xsk_rcv_memcpy(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 addr, void *from_buf,
> +               u32 len, u32 metalen)
> +{
> +       void *to_buf = xdp_umem_get_data(umem, addr);
> +
> +       if (xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(umem, addr)) {
> +               void *next_pg_addr = umem->pages[(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)+1].addr;
> +               u64 page_start = addr & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
> +               u64 first_len = PAGE_SIZE - (addr - page_start);
> +
> +               memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, first_len + metalen);
> +               memcpy(next_pg_addr, from_buf + first_len, len - first_len);
> +
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, len + metalen);
> +}
> +
>  static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
>  {
> -       void *to_buf, *from_buf;
> +       void *from_buf;
>         u32 metalen;
>         u64 addr;
>         int err;
>
> -       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr) ||
> +       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr, xs->umem) ||
>             len > xs->umem->chunk_size_nohr - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
>                 xs->rx_dropped++;
>                 return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -72,8 +94,8 @@ static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
>                 metalen = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
>         }
>
> -       to_buf = xdp_umem_get_data(xs->umem, addr);
> -       memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, len + metalen);
> +       __xsk_rcv_memcpy(xs->umem, addr, from_buf, len, metalen);
> +
>         addr += metalen;
>         err = xskq_produce_batch_desc(xs->rx, addr, len);
>         if (!err) {
> @@ -126,7 +148,7 @@ int xsk_generic_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>         if (xs->dev != xdp->rxq->dev || xs->queue_id != xdp->rxq->queue_index)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr) ||
> +       if (!xskq_peek_addr(xs->umem->fq, &addr, xs->umem) ||
>             len > xs->umem->chunk_size_nohr - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
>                 xs->rx_dropped++;
>                 return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -173,7 +195,7 @@ bool xsk_umem_consume_tx(struct xdp_umem *umem, dma_addr_t *dma, u32 *len)
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
>         list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &umem->xsk_list, list) {
> -               if (!xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc))
> +               if (!xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, umem))
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (xskq_produce_addr_lazy(umem->cq, desc.addr))
> @@ -226,7 +248,7 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *m,
>
>         mutex_lock(&xs->mutex);
>
> -       while (xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc)) {
> +       while (xskq_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->umem)) {
>                 char *buffer;
>                 u64 addr;
>                 u32 len;
> @@ -393,6 +415,26 @@ static struct socket *xsk_lookup_xsk_from_fd(int fd)
>         return sock;
>  }
>
> +/* Check if umem pages are contiguous.
> + * If zero-copy mode, use the DMA address to do the page contiguity check
> + * For all other modes we use addr (kernel virtual address)
> + */
> +static void xsk_check_page_contiguity(struct xdp_umem *umem, u32 flags)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       if (flags & XDP_ZEROCOPY) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < umem->npgs-1; i++)
> +                       umem->pages[i].next_pg_contig =
> +                                       (umem->pages[i].dma + PAGE_SIZE == umem->pages[i+1].dma);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < umem->npgs-1; i++)
> +               umem->pages[i].next_pg_contig =
> +                               (umem->pages[i].addr + PAGE_SIZE == umem->pages[i+1].addr);
> +}
> +
>  static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
>  {
>         struct sockaddr_xdp *sxdp = (struct sockaddr_xdp *)addr;
> @@ -480,6 +522,8 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
>                 err = xdp_umem_assign_dev(xs->umem, dev, qid, flags);
>                 if (err)
>                         goto out_unlock;
> +
> +               xsk_check_page_contiguity(xs->umem, flags);
>         }
>
>         xs->dev = dev;
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> index 88b9ae24658d..c2676a1df938 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ static inline u32 xskq_nb_free(struct xsk_queue *q, u32 producer, u32 dcnt)
>
>  /* UMEM queue */
>
> +static inline bool xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 addr)
> +{
> +       bool cross_pg = (addr & (PAGE_SIZE-1)) + umem->chunk_size_nohr > PAGE_SIZE;
> +       bool next_pg_contig = umem->pages[(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)+1].next_pg_contig;
> +
> +       return cross_pg && !next_pg_contig;
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>  {
>         if (addr >= q->size) {
> @@ -129,23 +137,44 @@ static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr)
>         return true;
>  }
>
> -static inline u64 *xskq_validate_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
> +static inline bool xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
> +{
> +       if (addr >= q->size ||
> +                       xskq_crosses_non_contig_pg(umem, addr)) {
> +               q->invalid_descs++;
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 *xskq_validate_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         while (q->cons_tail != q->cons_head) {
>                 struct xdp_umem_ring *ring = (struct xdp_umem_ring *)q->ring;
>                 unsigned int idx = q->cons_tail & q->ring_mask;
>
>                 *addr = READ_ONCE(ring->desc[idx]) & q->chunk_mask;
> +               if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS) {
> +                       if (xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(q, *addr, umem))
> +                               return addr;
> +                       goto out;
> +               }
> +
>                 if (xskq_is_valid_addr(q, *addr))
>                         return addr;
>
> +out:
>                 q->cons_tail++;
>         }
>
>         return NULL;
>  }
>
> -static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
> +static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr,
> +               struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         if (q->cons_tail == q->cons_head) {
>                 smp_mb(); /* D, matches A */
> @@ -156,7 +185,7 @@ static inline u64 *xskq_peek_addr(struct xsk_queue *q, u64 *addr)
>                 smp_rmb();
>         }
>
> -       return xskq_validate_addr(q, addr);
> +       return xskq_validate_addr(q, addr, umem);
>  }
>
>  static inline void xskq_discard_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
> @@ -215,8 +244,21 @@ static inline int xskq_reserve_addr(struct xsk_queue *q)
>
>  /* Rx/Tx queue */
>
> -static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d)
> +static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d,
> +                                                  struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
> +       if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS) {
> +               if (!xskq_is_valid_addr_unaligned(q, d->addr, umem))
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               if ((d->len > umem->chunk_size_nohr) || d->options) {
> +                       q->invalid_descs++;
> +                       return false;
> +               }
> +
> +               return true;
> +       }
> +
>         if (!xskq_is_valid_addr(q, d->addr))
>                 return false;
>
> @@ -230,14 +272,15 @@ static inline bool xskq_is_valid_desc(struct xsk_queue *q, struct xdp_desc *d)
>  }
>
>  static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_validate_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
> -                                                 struct xdp_desc *desc)
> +                                                 struct xdp_desc *desc,
> +                                                 struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         while (q->cons_tail != q->cons_head) {
>                 struct xdp_rxtx_ring *ring = (struct xdp_rxtx_ring *)q->ring;
>                 unsigned int idx = q->cons_tail & q->ring_mask;
>
>                 *desc = READ_ONCE(ring->desc[idx]);
> -               if (xskq_is_valid_desc(q, desc))
> +               if (xskq_is_valid_desc(q, desc, umem))
>                         return desc;
>
>                 q->cons_tail++;
> @@ -247,7 +290,8 @@ static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_validate_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
>  }
>
>  static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_peek_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
> -                                             struct xdp_desc *desc)
> +                                             struct xdp_desc *desc,
> +                                             struct xdp_umem *umem)
>  {
>         if (q->cons_tail == q->cons_head) {
>                 smp_mb(); /* D, matches A */
> @@ -258,7 +302,7 @@ static inline struct xdp_desc *xskq_peek_desc(struct xsk_queue *q,
>                 smp_rmb(); /* C, matches B */
>         }
>
> -       return xskq_validate_desc(q, desc);
> +       return xskq_validate_desc(q, desc, umem);
>  }
>
>  static inline void xskq_discard_desc(struct xsk_queue *q)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 275+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20  9:09 [PATCH 00/11] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 14:29   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 14:29     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 14:30   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 14:30     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] xdp: add offset param to zero_copy_allocator Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 14:31   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 14:31     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-24 19:23   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-24 19:23     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-25 13:14     ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-06-25 13:14       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] i40e: add offset to zca_free Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 14:32   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 14:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 14:32   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 14:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:29   ` Björn Töpel [this message]
2019-06-24 15:29     ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:30   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 15:30     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:31   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 15:31     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:35   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 15:35     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:36   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 15:36     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-06-20  9:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-24 15:34   ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-24 15:34     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-07-16  3:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-19 17:19     ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-19 17:19       ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-19 17:20     ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-19 17:20       ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-19 17:21     ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-19 17:21       ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] i40e: modify driver for handling offsets Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-19 17:22     ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-19 17:22       ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-19 17:22     ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-19 17:22       ` Bowers, AndrewX
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 07/10] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-07-16  3:06     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-23 21:08   ` [PATCH v2 00/10] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Alexei Starovoitov
2019-07-23 21:08     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexei Starovoitov
2019-07-24 13:25     ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-07-24 13:25       ` Magnus Karlsson
2019-07-25 15:43       ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-25 15:43         ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-24  5:10   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-25  2:22       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-25  2:22         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2019-07-25 17:01         ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25 17:01           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25  9:27       ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25  9:27         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 17:00         ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25 17:00           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25 10:08       ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 10:08         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 15:39       ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-25 15:39         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-26  9:47         ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-26  9:58           ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] i40e: modify driver for handling offsets Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] mlx5e: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-25 10:15       ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 10:15         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 17:00         ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25 17:00           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-25  9:43       ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25  9:43         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-07-25 17:00         ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-25 17:00           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-07-24  5:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-25 15:39     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-25 15:39       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-25 15:56       ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-07-25 15:56         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Richardson, Bruce
2019-07-25 17:30         ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-25 17:30           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-26  8:41           ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-26  8:41             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bruce Richardson
2019-07-30  8:53     ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/11] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/11] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-31 12:45         ` Björn Töpel
2019-07-31 12:45           ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-07-31 14:25         ` Björn Töpel
2019-07-31 14:25           ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-08-01  6:59           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-01  6:59             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-01  7:34             ` Björn Töpel
2019-08-01  7:34               ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-08-02  7:19               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-02  7:19                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-02  7:26                 ` Björn Töpel
2019-08-02  7:26                   ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-31 18:11         ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-31 18:11           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/11] i40e: modify driver for handling offsets Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/11] mlx5e: " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-31 18:10         ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-31 18:10           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-01 10:05         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-01 10:05           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-19 14:36           ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-19 14:36             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-19 14:47             ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-08-19 14:47               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/11] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/11] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-31 18:26         ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-31 18:26           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-07-30  8:53       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/11] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:53         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:54       ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/11] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-07-30  8:54         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44       ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/11] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/11] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22 18:43           ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-22 18:43             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-23 13:35             ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-08-23 13:35               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Laatz, Kevin
2019-08-27  7:36           ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-27  7:36             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/11] i40e: modify driver for handling offsets Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/11] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/11] mlx5e: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/11] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/11] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/11] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/11] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44         ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/11] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-08-22  1:44           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25         ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/12] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/12] i40e: simplify Rx buffer recycle Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:37             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:37               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/12] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:39             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:39               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/12] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:41             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:41               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/12] i40e: modify driver for handling offsets Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:42             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:42               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/12] ixgbe: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:42             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:42               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/12] mlx5e: " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:43             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:43               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/12] net/mlx5e: Allow XSK frames smaller than a page Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:45             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:45               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/12] libbpf: add flags to umem config Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:46             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:46               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/12] samples/bpf: add unaligned chunks mode support to xdpsock Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:47             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:47               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/12] samples/bpf: add buffer recycling for unaligned chunks " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:49             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:49               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/12] samples/bpf: use hugepages in xdpsock app Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:51             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:51               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-27  2:25           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/12] doc/af_xdp: include unaligned chunk case Kevin Laatz
2019-08-27  2:25             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kevin Laatz
2019-08-30 15:51             ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:51               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:52           ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/12] XDP unaligned chunk placement support Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 15:52             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-30 23:29           ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-08-30 23:29             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Borkmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-20  8:39 [PATCH 00/11] " Kevin Laatz
2019-06-20  8:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] xsk: add support to allow unaligned chunk placement Kevin Laatz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJ+HfNjC6Rd_eK3Uw=QynfhEc1n8Bm-3RZrTywXMMeTWjNsMjw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.