[meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Zoltan Kuscsik]

Hi,

I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45.

So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit):

https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser

It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.
Br,

Zoltan

-- 
Zoltan Kuscsik

Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group
email: zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org
IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Khem Raj]

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Zoltan Kuscsik
<zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45.
>
> So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit):
>
> https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser
>
> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.

xkbcommon change should go into oe-core
tc_malloc disabled, should become a PACKAGECONFIG, its a perf tool
anyway so disabling it is ok.

ozone and VAAPI should also become packageconfigs

fix_64_bit_builds.patch assumes gcc, I did not like it for that
reason, it could have been done in compiler independent way

> Br,
>
> Zoltan
>
> --
> Zoltan Kuscsik
>
> Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group
> email: zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org
> IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Nicolas Dechesne]

hi,

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Zoltan Kuscsik
<zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org> wrote:
> So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit):
>
> https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser

just for the record.. I am using/testing this set of recipes on
IFC6410 (armv7) and DragonBoard 410c (armv8), and so far so good.

it would be good if the helper script google-chrome could parse a
'default' config file, so that as a downstream user it is easy for me
to hook my own customizations in this script, something like

. /etc/default/google-chrome

nico

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Julien Brianceau (jbriance)]

Hi,

> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.

I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license declaration in chromium recipes.
Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through chromium.inc file.
Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe.

Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared in the recipe as well ?

Regards,

Julien

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 801 bytes --]


> On Oct 9, 2015, at 4:31 AM, Zoltan Kuscsik <zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45.
> 
> So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit):
> 
> https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser
> 
> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.
> Br,

when are you going to post a pull request for these.

> 
> Zoltan
> 
> --
> Zoltan Kuscsik
> 
> Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group
> email: zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org
> IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Andre McCurdy]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance)
<jbriance@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.
>
> I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license declaration in chromium recipes.
> Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through chromium.inc file.
> Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe.
>
> Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared in the recipe as well ?

Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty
good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based
recipes.

https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb

> Regards,
>
> Julien
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Zoltan Kuscsik]

Thanks for the comments. I'm going to clean up the recipes and I'm trying
to upstream some of the
patches to chromium to reduce the maintenance on meta-browser.

Z



On 24 October 2015 at 06:39, Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance)
> <jbriance@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome.
> >
> > I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license
> declaration in chromium recipes.
> > Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through
> chromium.inc file.
> > Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official
> contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD
> licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe.
> >
> > Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared
> in the recipe as well ?
>
> Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty
> good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based
> recipes.
>
>
> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Julien
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>



-- 
Zoltan Kuscsik

Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group
email: zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org
IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org

Re: [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Zoltan Kuscsik
<zoltan.kuscsik@linaro.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. I'm going to clean up the recipes and I'm trying
> to upstream some of the
> patches to chromium to reduce the maintenance on meta-browser.

Awesome :-) I look forward to see those patches ... :-)

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750