All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist:  blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
@ 2015-04-23  3:24 Alex Hung
  2015-04-24  8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-04-23  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rjw, lenb, linux-acpi, alex.hung

Dell Inspiron 7437's ACPI events does not work well with Win8 OSI.
Disabling Win8 OSI can fix wireless hotkey and ACPI battery.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/blacklist.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
index 37925a3..e2db565 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
@@ -306,6 +306,14 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpi_osi_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
 		    DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Vostro 3546"),
 		},
 	},
+	{
+	.callback = dmi_disable_osi_win8,
+	.ident = "Dell Inspiron 7437",
+	.matches = {
+		    DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Dell Inc."),
+		    DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Inspiron 7437"),
+		},
+	},
 
 	/*
 	 * The brightness hotkeys do not work on those machines when
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist:  blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-23  3:24 [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437 Alex Hung
@ 2015-04-24  8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-04-27  8:30   ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-04-24  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Hung; +Cc: rjw, lenb, linux-acpi

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:24:35AM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
> Dell Inspiron 7437's ACPI events does not work well with Win8 OSI.
> Disabling Win8 OSI can fix wireless hotkey and ACPI battery.

Does this machine work if you actually install Windows 8 on it?
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-24  8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-04-27  8:30   ` Alex Hung
  2015-04-27 17:46     ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-04-27  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

I don't have any Win8 media to test it but I will try to look for one.

I recalled that kernel 4.1rc has a patch "ACPICA: Permanently set _REV
to the value '2'" that may also change firmware's behaviours, but it
does not fix Inspiron 7437's ACPI event just for references.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:24:35AM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
>> Dell Inspiron 7437's ACPI events does not work well with Win8 OSI.
>> Disabling Win8 OSI can fix wireless hotkey and ACPI battery.
>
> Does this machine work if you actually install Windows 8 on it?
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-27  8:30   ` Alex Hung
@ 2015-04-27 17:46     ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-04-28  4:53       ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-04-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Hung; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:30:11PM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
> I don't have any Win8 media to test it but I will try to look for one.
> 
> I recalled that kernel 4.1rc has a patch "ACPICA: Permanently set _REV
> to the value '2'" that may also change firmware's behaviours, but it
> does not fix Inspiron 7437's ACPI event just for references.

The _REV behaviour didn't change between Windows 7 and 8, so it 
shouldn't be relevant here.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-27 17:46     ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-04-28  4:53       ` Alex Hung
  2015-04-28  5:24         ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-04-28  4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

I tried Windows 8.1 Pro, and it seems that wireless hotkey works fine
(with AirplaneMode driver installed) and ACPI battery works fine too.
I didn't observe similar ACPI interrupt problems that occur on Linux.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:30:11PM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
>> I don't have any Win8 media to test it but I will try to look for one.
>>
>> I recalled that kernel 4.1rc has a patch "ACPICA: Permanently set _REV
>> to the value '2'" that may also change firmware's behaviours, but it
>> does not fix Inspiron 7437's ACPI event just for references.
>
> The _REV behaviour didn't change between Windows 7 and 8, so it
> shouldn't be relevant here.
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-28  4:53       ` Alex Hung
@ 2015-04-28  5:24         ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-04-28  9:51           ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-04-28  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Hung; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:53:10PM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
> I tried Windows 8.1 Pro, and it seems that wireless hotkey works fine
> (with AirplaneMode driver installed) and ACPI battery works fine too.
> I didn't observe similar ACPI interrupt problems that occur on Linux.

Ok, sounds like we've got another problem somewhere. Do you have the 
acpidump?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-28  5:24         ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-04-28  9:51           ` Alex Hung
  2015-04-28 17:11             ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-04-28  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

Matthew,

Its acpidump is available @ http://people.canonical.com/~alexhung/LP1435731/


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:53:10PM +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
>> I tried Windows 8.1 Pro, and it seems that wireless hotkey works fine
>> (with AirplaneMode driver installed) and ACPI battery works fine too.
>> I didn't observe similar ACPI interrupt problems that occur on Linux.
>
> Ok, sounds like we've got another problem somewhere. Do you have the
> acpidump?
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-28  9:51           ` Alex Hung
@ 2015-04-28 17:11             ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-04-29 10:09               ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-04-28 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Hung; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

With Windows 8 enabled you're going down this path:

        If (_OSI (WIN8))
        {
            Local0 = 0x81
        }

With it blacklisted, you're going down this path:

        If (_OSI (WIN7))
        {
            Local0 = 0x80
            Local1 = _REV /* \_REV */
            If ((Local1 == 0x05))
            {
                Local0 = 0x40
            }
        }

So your guess about _REV was actually correct - if the OS claims to be 
Windows 7 and returns 5 to _REV, it'll let Local0 to 0x40. This results 
in:

        If ((Local0 == 0x40))
        {
            MIS0 = SMI (0x98, Zero)
            MIS0 &= 0x13
        }

MIS0 appears to be involved in various event delivery paths, so my 
suspicion is that the firmware is deliberately working around a quirk of 
Linux behaviour in order to deliver events appropriately. If so, your 
patch won't help in 4.1 because _REV now returns 2, and so we need to 
root cause the actual problem and fix that instead.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-28 17:11             ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-04-29 10:09               ` Alex Hung
  2015-05-14 19:02                 ` Mario Limonciello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-04-29 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux ACPI Mailing List

Matthew,

Your conclusion is correct. Disabling OSI(Windows 2012/2013) in kernel
4.1rc will not work. I will take a closer look into this machine.

Thanks.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> With Windows 8 enabled you're going down this path:
>
>         If (_OSI (WIN8))
>         {
>             Local0 = 0x81
>         }
>
> With it blacklisted, you're going down this path:
>
>         If (_OSI (WIN7))
>         {
>             Local0 = 0x80
>             Local1 = _REV /* \_REV */
>             If ((Local1 == 0x05))
>             {
>                 Local0 = 0x40
>             }
>         }
>
> So your guess about _REV was actually correct - if the OS claims to be
> Windows 7 and returns 5 to _REV, it'll let Local0 to 0x40. This results
> in:
>
>         If ((Local0 == 0x40))
>         {
>             MIS0 = SMI (0x98, Zero)
>             MIS0 &= 0x13
>         }
>
> MIS0 appears to be involved in various event delivery paths, so my
> suspicion is that the firmware is deliberately working around a quirk of
> Linux behaviour in order to deliver events appropriately. If so, your
> patch won't help in 4.1 because _REV now returns 2, and so we need to
> root cause the actual problem and fix that instead.
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-04-29 10:09               ` Alex Hung
@ 2015-05-14 19:02                 ` Mario Limonciello
  2015-05-14 19:13                   ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2015-05-14 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Hung, Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Linux ACPI Mailing List



On 04/29/2015 05:09 AM, Alex Hung wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> Your conclusion is correct. Disabling OSI(Windows 2012/2013) in kernel
> 4.1rc will not work. I will take a closer look into this machine.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>> With Windows 8 enabled you're going down this path:
>>
>>          If (_OSI (WIN8))
>>          {
>>              Local0 = 0x81
>>          }
>>
>> With it blacklisted, you're going down this path:
>>
>>          If (_OSI (WIN7))
>>          {
>>              Local0 = 0x80
>>              Local1 = _REV /* \_REV */
>>              If ((Local1 == 0x05))
>>              {
>>                  Local0 = 0x40
>>              }
>>          }
>>
>> So your guess about _REV was actually correct - if the OS claims to be
>> Windows 7 and returns 5 to _REV, it'll let Local0 to 0x40. This results
>> in:
>>
>>          If ((Local0 == 0x40))
>>          {
>>              MIS0 = SMI (0x98, Zero)
>>              MIS0 &= 0x13
>>          }
>>
>> MIS0 appears to be involved in various event delivery paths, so my
>> suspicion is that the firmware is deliberately working around a quirk of
>> Linux behaviour in order to deliver events appropriately. If so, your
>> patch won't help in 4.1 because _REV now returns 2, and so we need to
>> root cause the actual problem and fix that instead.
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
Matthew,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention on that other thread. I've 
checked with the team more on this.  I'm also looking into any other 
platforms that are quirking behavior on _REV.  If you are aware of any 
other specifics I can inquire on those too.
The 7437 platform (and it's two sister platforms 7537 and 7737) include 
the following differences when acpi_osi=Windows 2009 and _REV is 5.  
These platforms were enabled in the era before Windows 2013 was default 
_OSI in the Linux kernel.
* Backlight control is set to 16 levels in Win7 and Linux.  It's set to 
10 levels in Win 8/Win8.1.
* Battery information was not displayed in the OS.  The BIOS team found 
that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS in the 
same way that Windows does.  The delta path creates a SMI event to get 
battery information.

Alex,

Does dell-rbtn/dell-airplane work properly with this platform when set 
to Windows 2013?  I'd expect that should fix the wireless hotkey issue.  
As you know airplane mode is only effective on systems with _OSI of 
Windows 2013.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-14 19:02                 ` Mario Limonciello
@ 2015-05-14 19:13                   ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-05-14 19:17                     ` Mario Limonciello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-05-14 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Limonciello; +Cc: Alex Hung, Linux ACPI Mailing List

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:

> * Battery information was not displayed in the OS.  The BIOS team
> found that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS
> in the same way that Windows does.  The delta path creates a SMI
> event to get battery information.

Huh. Is there any chance we can find out what the difference is so we 
can make them equivalent?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-14 19:13                   ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-05-14 19:17                     ` Mario Limonciello
  2015-05-20 17:42                       ` Mario Limonciello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2015-05-14 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Alex Hung, Linux ACPI Mailing List



On 05/14/2015 02:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>> * Battery information was not displayed in the OS.  The BIOS team
>> found that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS
>> in the same way that Windows does.  The delta path creates a SMI
>> event to get battery information.
> Huh. Is there any chance we can find out what the difference is so we
> can make them equivalent?
>

That was my reaction too.  I'm asking for some technical details on this.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-14 19:17                     ` Mario Limonciello
@ 2015-05-20 17:42                       ` Mario Limonciello
  2015-05-20 18:42                         ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2015-05-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Alex Hung, Linux ACPI Mailing List

On 05/14/2015 02:17 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> On 05/14/2015 02:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>
>>> * Battery information was not displayed in the OS.  The BIOS team
>>> found that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS
>>> in the same way that Windows does.  The delta path creates a SMI
>>> event to get battery information.
>> Huh. Is there any chance we can find out what the difference is so we
>> can make them equivalent?
>>
> That was my reaction too.  I'm asking for some technical details on this.
Hi Matthew,

I've gotten some more information on this.
Windows: Asks for battery information update multiple times.
Linux: Only asks once for battery information update.

The net result is that on Linux ACPI battery is missing.  In the _REV 
test BIOS workaround, a SMI event was added to ask for battery 
information update.

Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-20 17:42                       ` Mario Limonciello
@ 2015-05-20 18:42                         ` Matthew Garrett
  2015-05-20 20:16                           ` Mario Limonciello
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2015-05-20 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Limonciello; +Cc: Alex Hung, Linux ACPI Mailing List

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:14PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:

> I've gotten some more information on this.
> Windows: Asks for battery information update multiple times.
> Linux: Only asks once for battery information update.
> 
> The net result is that on Linux ACPI battery is missing.  In the
> _REV test BIOS workaround, a SMI event was added to ask for battery
> information update.

Hm. Why does only asking once not result in us seeing the battery?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-20 18:42                         ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2015-05-20 20:16                           ` Mario Limonciello
  2015-06-02  3:20                             ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2015-05-20 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: Alex Hung, Linux ACPI Mailing List



On 05/20/2015 01:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:14PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>> I've gotten some more information on this.
>> Windows: Asks for battery information update multiple times.
>> Linux: Only asks once for battery information update.
>>
>> The net result is that on Linux ACPI battery is missing.  In the
>> _REV test BIOS workaround, a SMI event was added to ask for battery
>> information update.
> Hm. Why does only asking once not result in us seeing the battery?
>
I'm not sure, this is all I was told about the difference in behavior 
with Windows that prompted this bios workaround.  Looking through the 
kernel log, i'm wondering if maybe 
75646e758a0ecbed5024454507d5be5b9ea9dcbf will actually have fixed this.

Alex,

What was the last kernel validated on the 7*37 family?  Can you see if a 
kernel that includes 75646e758a0ecbed5024454507d5be5b9ea9dcbf does 
resolve it?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437
  2015-05-20 20:16                           ` Mario Limonciello
@ 2015-06-02  3:20                             ` Alex Hung
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alex Hung @ 2015-06-02  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mario Limonciello; +Cc: Matthew Garrett, Linux ACPI Mailing List

I ran at least kernel 3.19 (Ubuntu Vivid), 4.0 and 4.1rc on 7437, and
they have the same symptom - ACPI events are not generated with
wireless hotkey presses and battery info is not updated. The commit
75646e758a0ecbed5024454507d5be5b9ea9dcbf is included.

If I ran "cat /proc/interrupts", interrupt 9 (acpi) is not incrementing.

If AC is plugged/unplugged, battery will be updated once. This implies
AC event is generated correctly.

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Mario Limonciello
<mario_limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/20/2015 01:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:14PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>
>>> I've gotten some more information on this.
>>> Windows: Asks for battery information update multiple times.
>>> Linux: Only asks once for battery information update.
>>>
>>> The net result is that on Linux ACPI battery is missing.  In the
>>> _REV test BIOS workaround, a SMI event was added to ask for battery
>>> information update.
>>
>> Hm. Why does only asking once not result in us seeing the battery?
>>
> I'm not sure, this is all I was told about the difference in behavior with
> Windows that prompted this bios workaround.  Looking through the kernel log,
> i'm wondering if maybe 75646e758a0ecbed5024454507d5be5b9ea9dcbf will
> actually have fixed this.
>
> Alex,
>
> What was the last kernel validated on the 7*37 family?  Can you see if a
> kernel that includes 75646e758a0ecbed5024454507d5be5b9ea9dcbf does resolve
> it?
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-02  3:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-23  3:24 [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437 Alex Hung
2015-04-24  8:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-04-27  8:30   ` Alex Hung
2015-04-27 17:46     ` Matthew Garrett
2015-04-28  4:53       ` Alex Hung
2015-04-28  5:24         ` Matthew Garrett
2015-04-28  9:51           ` Alex Hung
2015-04-28 17:11             ` Matthew Garrett
2015-04-29 10:09               ` Alex Hung
2015-05-14 19:02                 ` Mario Limonciello
2015-05-14 19:13                   ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-14 19:17                     ` Mario Limonciello
2015-05-20 17:42                       ` Mario Limonciello
2015-05-20 18:42                         ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-20 20:16                           ` Mario Limonciello
2015-06-02  3:20                             ` Alex Hung

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.