* [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation
@ 2015-03-25 23:03 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2015-03-25 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh+dt, pawel.moll, mark.rutland, ijc+devicetree, galak,
devicetree, ohad
Cc: linux-kernel, Wei Chen, Barry Song
From: Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>
Add hwspinlock support for the CSR atlas7 SoC.
The Hardware Spinlock device on atlas7 provides hardware assistance
for synchronization between the multiple processors in the system
(dual Cortex-A7, CAN bus Cortex-M3 and audio DSP).
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
---
.../bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt | 18 +++
drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 12 ++
drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b22c492
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+SIRF Hardware spinlock device Binding
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+Required properties :
+- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
+ "sirf,hwspinlock"
+
+- reg : the register address of hwspinlock
+
+- num-spinlocks : how many spinlocks this device provides
+
+Example:
+ hwspinlock {
+ compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock";
+ reg = <0x13240000 0x00010000>;
+
+ num-spinlocks = <30>;
+ };
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
index 3612cb5..fc400e4 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
@@ -29,4 +29,16 @@ config HSEM_U8500
If unsure, say N.
+config HWSPINLOCK_SIRF
+ tristate "SIRF Hardware Spinlock device"
+ depends on ARCH_SIRF
+ select HWSPINLOCK
+ help
+ Say y here to support the SIRF Hardware Spinlock device, which
+ provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processor
+ on the SoC.
+
+ It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in SIRF hardware
+ spinlock or just want a bare minimum kernel.
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
index 93eb64b..472b82d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock_core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_OMAP) += omap_hwspinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HSEM_U8500) += u8500_hsem.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_SIRF) += sirf_hwspinlock.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b68722a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * SIRF hardware spinlock driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
+ *
+ * Licensed under GPLv2.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+
+#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
+
+struct sirf_hwspinlock {
+ void __iomem *io_base;
+ struct hwspinlock_device bank;
+};
+
+/* Hardware spinlock register offsets */
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_RD_DEBUG 0x400
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_BASE 0x404
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(x) (HW_SPINLOCK_BASE + 0x4 * (x))
+
+/* Possible values of HW_SPINLOCK_REG */
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED 0
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_FREE 1
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+ /* attempt to acquire the lock by reading its value */
+ return (HW_SPINLOCK_FREE == readl(lock_addr));
+}
+
+static void sirf_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+ /* release the lock by writing 0 to it */
+ writel(HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED, lock_addr);
+}
+
+static void sirf_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ ndelay(50);
+}
+
+static const struct hwspinlock_ops sirf_hwspinlock_ops = {
+ .trylock = sirf_hwspinlock_trylock,
+ .unlock = sirf_hwspinlock_unlock,
+ .relax = sirf_hwspinlock_relax,
+};
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin;
+ struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
+ u32 num_of_locks;
+ int idx, ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "num-spinlocks", &num_of_locks);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "Unable to find hwspinlock number. ret=%d\n", ret);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ hwspin = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hwspin) +
+ sizeof(*hwlock) * num_of_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hwspin)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* retrieve io base */
+ hwspin->io_base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+ if (!hwspin->io_base)
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < num_of_locks; idx++) {
+ hwlock = &hwspin->bank.lock[idx];
+ hwlock->priv = hwspin->io_base + HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(idx);
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwspin);
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+
+ ret = hwspin_lock_register(&hwspin->bank, &pdev->dev,
+ &sirf_hwspinlock_ops, 0, num_of_locks);
+ if (ret)
+ goto reg_failed;
+
+ return 0;
+
+reg_failed:
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(&hwspin->bank);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+
+ iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id sirf_hwpinlock_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirf_hwpinlock_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver sirf_hwspinlock_driver = {
+ .probe = sirf_hwspinlock_probe,
+ .remove = sirf_hwspinlock_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "atlas7_hwspinlock",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirf_hwpinlock_ids),
+ },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(sirf_hwspinlock_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SIRF Hardware spinlock driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>");
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation
@ 2015-03-25 23:03 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2015-03-25 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Wei Chen, Barry Song
From: Wei Chen <wei.chen-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>
Add hwspinlock support for the CSR atlas7 SoC.
The Hardware Spinlock device on atlas7 provides hardware assistance
for synchronization between the multiple processors in the system
(dual Cortex-A7, CAN bus Cortex-M3 and audio DSP).
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>
---
.../bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt | 18 +++
drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 12 ++
drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b22c492
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+SIRF Hardware spinlock device Binding
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+Required properties :
+- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
+ "sirf,hwspinlock"
+
+- reg : the register address of hwspinlock
+
+- num-spinlocks : how many spinlocks this device provides
+
+Example:
+ hwspinlock {
+ compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock";
+ reg = <0x13240000 0x00010000>;
+
+ num-spinlocks = <30>;
+ };
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
index 3612cb5..fc400e4 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
@@ -29,4 +29,16 @@ config HSEM_U8500
If unsure, say N.
+config HWSPINLOCK_SIRF
+ tristate "SIRF Hardware Spinlock device"
+ depends on ARCH_SIRF
+ select HWSPINLOCK
+ help
+ Say y here to support the SIRF Hardware Spinlock device, which
+ provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processor
+ on the SoC.
+
+ It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in SIRF hardware
+ spinlock or just want a bare minimum kernel.
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
index 93eb64b..472b82d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock_core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_OMAP) += omap_hwspinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HSEM_U8500) += u8500_hsem.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_SIRF) += sirf_hwspinlock.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b68722a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * SIRF hardware spinlock driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
+ *
+ * Licensed under GPLv2.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+
+#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
+
+struct sirf_hwspinlock {
+ void __iomem *io_base;
+ struct hwspinlock_device bank;
+};
+
+/* Hardware spinlock register offsets */
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_RD_DEBUG 0x400
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_BASE 0x404
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(x) (HW_SPINLOCK_BASE + 0x4 * (x))
+
+/* Possible values of HW_SPINLOCK_REG */
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED 0
+#define HW_SPINLOCK_FREE 1
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+ /* attempt to acquire the lock by reading its value */
+ return (HW_SPINLOCK_FREE == readl(lock_addr));
+}
+
+static void sirf_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+ /* release the lock by writing 0 to it */
+ writel(HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED, lock_addr);
+}
+
+static void sirf_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+ ndelay(50);
+}
+
+static const struct hwspinlock_ops sirf_hwspinlock_ops = {
+ .trylock = sirf_hwspinlock_trylock,
+ .unlock = sirf_hwspinlock_unlock,
+ .relax = sirf_hwspinlock_relax,
+};
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin;
+ struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
+ u32 num_of_locks;
+ int idx, ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "num-spinlocks", &num_of_locks);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "Unable to find hwspinlock number. ret=%d\n", ret);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ hwspin = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hwspin) +
+ sizeof(*hwlock) * num_of_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hwspin)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* retrieve io base */
+ hwspin->io_base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+ if (!hwspin->io_base)
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < num_of_locks; idx++) {
+ hwlock = &hwspin->bank.lock[idx];
+ hwlock->priv = hwspin->io_base + HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(idx);
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwspin);
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+
+ ret = hwspin_lock_register(&hwspin->bank, &pdev->dev,
+ &sirf_hwspinlock_ops, 0, num_of_locks);
+ if (ret)
+ goto reg_failed;
+
+ return 0;
+
+reg_failed:
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int sirf_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(&hwspin->bank);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+
+ iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id sirf_hwpinlock_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock", },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirf_hwpinlock_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver sirf_hwspinlock_driver = {
+ .probe = sirf_hwspinlock_probe,
+ .remove = sirf_hwspinlock_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "atlas7_hwspinlock",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirf_hwpinlock_ids),
+ },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(sirf_hwspinlock_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SIRF Hardware spinlock driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Chen <wei.chen-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>");
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation
2015-03-25 23:03 ` Barry Song
(?)
@ 2015-05-06 18:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-05-07 0:25 ` Barry Song
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2015-05-06 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
devicetree, Ohad Ben-Cohen, linux-kernel, Wei Chen, Barry Song
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>
>
> Add hwspinlock support for the CSR atlas7 SoC.
>
[..]
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b22c492
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +SIRF Hardware spinlock device Binding
> +-----------------------------------------------
> +
> +Required properties :
> +- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
> + "sirf,hwspinlock"
> +
> +- reg : the register address of hwspinlock
> +
> +- num-spinlocks : how many spinlocks this device provides
Why is number of spinlocks dynamic?
If you need to keep this it should have the "sirf," prefix.
You should either make a reference to the hwlock.txt pointing out the required
"#hwlock-cells" property, or simply include it here.
> +
> +Example:
> + hwspinlock {
> + compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock";
> + reg = <0x13240000 0x00010000>;
> +
> + num-spinlocks = <30>;
Does the hardware really have 30 locks?
The reason for my question is that we had a similar discussion regarding
this property for the Qualcomm driver, in which I ended up dropping the
property because I wanted the dt binding to describe the actual hardware
and not the limited amount stated in some software design document.
The example is missing #hwlock-cells = <1>;
> + };
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> index 3612cb5..fc400e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> @@ -29,4 +29,16 @@ config HSEM_U8500
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config HWSPINLOCK_SIRF
I would appreciate if you put this above HSEM_U8500 to keep the list
somewhat sorted.
> + tristate "SIRF Hardware Spinlock device"
> + depends on ARCH_SIRF
> + select HWSPINLOCK
> + help
> + Say y here to support the SIRF Hardware Spinlock device, which
> + provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processor
s/processor/processors
> + on the SoC.
> +
> + It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in SIRF hardware
> + spinlock or just want a bare minimum kernel.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
> index 93eb64b..472b82d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock_core.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_OMAP) += omap_hwspinlock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_HSEM_U8500) += u8500_hsem.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_SIRF) += sirf_hwspinlock.o
Please keep sort order here as well.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b68722a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/*
> + * SIRF hardware spinlock driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
> + *
> + * Licensed under GPLv2.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +
> +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
> +
> +struct sirf_hwspinlock {
> + void __iomem *io_base;
> + struct hwspinlock_device bank;
> +};
> +
> +/* Hardware spinlock register offsets */
> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_RD_DEBUG 0x400
> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_BASE 0x404
> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(x) (HW_SPINLOCK_BASE + 0x4 * (x))
> +
> +/* Possible values of HW_SPINLOCK_REG */
> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED 0
> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_FREE 1
> +
> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
> +
> + /* attempt to acquire the lock by reading its value */
> + return (HW_SPINLOCK_FREE == readl(lock_addr));
> +}
> +
> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
> +
> + /* release the lock by writing 0 to it */
> + writel(HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED, lock_addr);
This looks really wierd, but I assume the naming of the value is in line
with hardware documentation(?)
Instead of having the somewhat confusing names you could replace the
constants with just:
return !!readl(lock_addr);
and
writel(0, lock_addr);
If nothing else because you have the comments there as well...
> +}
> +
> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + ndelay(50);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct hwspinlock_ops sirf_hwspinlock_ops = {
> + .trylock = sirf_hwspinlock_trylock,
> + .unlock = sirf_hwspinlock_unlock,
> + .relax = sirf_hwspinlock_relax,
> +};
> +
> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin;
> + struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
> + u32 num_of_locks;
> + int idx, ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "num-spinlocks", &num_of_locks);
As above; if you need this the property should have a "sirf," prefix.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Unable to find hwspinlock number. ret=%d\n", ret);
No need to print the error code here.
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + hwspin = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hwspin) +
> + sizeof(*hwlock) * num_of_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hwspin)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* retrieve io base */
> + hwspin->io_base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> + if (!hwspin->io_base)
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
By using something like the following you can use devres for the ioremap.
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
hwspin->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
if (IS_ERR(hwspin->io_base))
return PTR_ERR(hwspin->io_base);
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < num_of_locks; idx++) {
> + hwlock = &hwspin->bank.lock[idx];
> + hwlock->priv = hwspin->io_base + HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(idx);
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwspin);
> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + ret = hwspin_lock_register(&hwspin->bank, &pdev->dev,
> + &sirf_hwspinlock_ops, 0, num_of_locks);
> + if (ret)
> + goto reg_failed;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +reg_failed:
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(&hwspin->bank);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + return ret;
Even if you return an error here the device will still be torn down.
> + }
> +
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sirf_hwpinlock_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirf_hwpinlock_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sirf_hwspinlock_driver = {
> + .probe = sirf_hwspinlock_probe,
> + .remove = sirf_hwspinlock_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "atlas7_hwspinlock",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirf_hwpinlock_ids),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(sirf_hwspinlock_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SIRF Hardware spinlock driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>");
Part of these details I think the patch looks good.
Regards,
Bjorn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation
@ 2015-05-07 0:25 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2015-05-07 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
devicetree, Ohad Ben-Cohen, linux-kernel, Wei Chen, Barry Song,
DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux
2015-05-07 2:13 GMT+08:00 Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>
>>
>> Add hwspinlock support for the CSR atlas7 SoC.
>>
> [..]
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b22c492
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +SIRF Hardware spinlock device Binding
>> +-----------------------------------------------
>> +
>> +Required properties :
>> +- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
>> + "sirf,hwspinlock"
>> +
>> +- reg : the register address of hwspinlock
>> +
>> +- num-spinlocks : how many spinlocks this device provides
>
> Why is number of spinlocks dynamic?
>
> If you need to keep this it should have the "sirf," prefix.
we would like to move it a MARCO in drivers directly just like other
spinlock drivers.
>
>
> You should either make a reference to the hwlock.txt pointing out the required
> "#hwlock-cells" property, or simply include it here.
yes. this has been discussed in another thread and Suman posted same comments.
>
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + hwspinlock {
>> + compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock";
>> + reg = <0x13240000 0x00010000>;
>> +
>> + num-spinlocks = <30>;
>
> Does the hardware really have 30 locks?
yes.
>
>
> The reason for my question is that we had a similar discussion regarding
> this property for the Qualcomm driver, in which I ended up dropping the
> property because I wanted the dt binding to describe the actual hardware
> and not the limited amount stated in some software design document.
>
the channel number should be HW? not SW?
>
> The example is missing #hwlock-cells = <1>;
>
>> + };
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> index 3612cb5..fc400e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> @@ -29,4 +29,16 @@ config HSEM_U8500
>>
>> If unsure, say N.
>>
>> +config HWSPINLOCK_SIRF
>
> I would appreciate if you put this above HSEM_U8500 to keep the list
> somewhat sorted.
>
looks fine.
>> + tristate "SIRF Hardware Spinlock device"
>> + depends on ARCH_SIRF
>> + select HWSPINLOCK
>> + help
>> + Say y here to support the SIRF Hardware Spinlock device, which
>> + provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processor
>
> s/processor/processors
>
>> + on the SoC.
>> +
>> + It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in SIRF hardware
>> + spinlock or just want a bare minimum kernel.
>> +
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> index 93eb64b..472b82d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock_core.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_OMAP) += omap_hwspinlock.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HSEM_U8500) += u8500_hsem.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_SIRF) += sirf_hwspinlock.o
>
> Please keep sort order here as well.
looks fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b68722a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
>> +/*
>> + * SIRF hardware spinlock driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
>> + *
>> + * Licensed under GPLv2.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +
>> +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
>> +
>> +struct sirf_hwspinlock {
>> + void __iomem *io_base;
>> + struct hwspinlock_device bank;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Hardware spinlock register offsets */
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_RD_DEBUG 0x400
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_BASE 0x404
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(x) (HW_SPINLOCK_BASE + 0x4 * (x))
>> +
>> +/* Possible values of HW_SPINLOCK_REG */
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED 0
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_FREE 1
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>> +
>> + /* attempt to acquire the lock by reading its value */
>> + return (HW_SPINLOCK_FREE == readl(lock_addr));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>> +
>> + /* release the lock by writing 0 to it */
>> + writel(HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED, lock_addr);
>
> This looks really wierd, but I assume the naming of the value is in line
> with hardware documentation(?)
looks wired too. will double-check.
>
>
> Instead of having the somewhat confusing names you could replace the
> constants with just:
> return !!readl(lock_addr);
> and
> writel(0, lock_addr);
>
> If nothing else because you have the comments there as well...
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + ndelay(50);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct hwspinlock_ops sirf_hwspinlock_ops = {
>> + .trylock = sirf_hwspinlock_trylock,
>> + .unlock = sirf_hwspinlock_unlock,
>> + .relax = sirf_hwspinlock_relax,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin;
>> + struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
>> + u32 num_of_locks;
>> + int idx, ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
>> + "num-spinlocks", &num_of_locks);
>
> As above; if you need this the property should have a "sirf," prefix.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Unable to find hwspinlock number. ret=%d\n", ret);
>
> No need to print the error code here.
>
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + hwspin = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hwspin) +
>> + sizeof(*hwlock) * num_of_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!hwspin)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* retrieve io base */
>> + hwspin->io_base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> + if (!hwspin->io_base)
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> By using something like the following you can use devres for the ioremap.
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> hwspin->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> if (IS_ERR(hwspin->io_base))
> return PTR_ERR(hwspin->io_base);
the benefit should be avoiding kfree. this should be a coding style
issue. i think this of_iomap is following the existing omap driver.
>
>> +
>> + for (idx = 0; idx < num_of_locks; idx++) {
>> + hwlock = &hwspin->bank.lock[idx];
>> + hwlock->priv = hwspin->io_base + HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(idx);
>> + }
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwspin);
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + ret = hwspin_lock_register(&hwspin->bank, &pdev->dev,
>> + &sirf_hwspinlock_ops, 0, num_of_locks);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto reg_failed;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +reg_failed:
>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(&hwspin->bank);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> + return ret;
>
> Even if you return an error here the device will still be torn down.
>
so what is your suggestion about this? do you think the unregister
should be "void" as other unregister functions?
>> + }
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sirf_hwpinlock_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirf_hwpinlock_ids);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver sirf_hwspinlock_driver = {
>> + .probe = sirf_hwspinlock_probe,
>> + .remove = sirf_hwspinlock_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "atlas7_hwspinlock",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirf_hwpinlock_ids),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(sirf_hwspinlock_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SIRF Hardware spinlock driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Chen <wei.chen@csr.com>");
>
> Part of these details I think the patch looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
-barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation
@ 2015-05-07 0:25 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2015-05-07 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson
Cc: Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Ohad Ben-Cohen,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Wei Chen, Barry Song,
DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux
2015-05-07 2:13 GMT+08:00 Bjorn Andersson <bjorn-UYDU3/A3LUY@public.gmane.org>:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Barry Song <21cnbao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> From: Wei Chen <wei.chen-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Add hwspinlock support for the CSR atlas7 SoC.
>>
> [..]
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b22c492
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/sirf,hwspinlock.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +SIRF Hardware spinlock device Binding
>> +-----------------------------------------------
>> +
>> +Required properties :
>> +- compatible : shall contain only one of the following:
>> + "sirf,hwspinlock"
>> +
>> +- reg : the register address of hwspinlock
>> +
>> +- num-spinlocks : how many spinlocks this device provides
>
> Why is number of spinlocks dynamic?
>
> If you need to keep this it should have the "sirf," prefix.
we would like to move it a MARCO in drivers directly just like other
spinlock drivers.
>
>
> You should either make a reference to the hwlock.txt pointing out the required
> "#hwlock-cells" property, or simply include it here.
yes. this has been discussed in another thread and Suman posted same comments.
>
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + hwspinlock {
>> + compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock";
>> + reg = <0x13240000 0x00010000>;
>> +
>> + num-spinlocks = <30>;
>
> Does the hardware really have 30 locks?
yes.
>
>
> The reason for my question is that we had a similar discussion regarding
> this property for the Qualcomm driver, in which I ended up dropping the
> property because I wanted the dt binding to describe the actual hardware
> and not the limited amount stated in some software design document.
>
the channel number should be HW? not SW?
>
> The example is missing #hwlock-cells = <1>;
>
>> + };
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> index 3612cb5..fc400e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
>> @@ -29,4 +29,16 @@ config HSEM_U8500
>>
>> If unsure, say N.
>>
>> +config HWSPINLOCK_SIRF
>
> I would appreciate if you put this above HSEM_U8500 to keep the list
> somewhat sorted.
>
looks fine.
>> + tristate "SIRF Hardware Spinlock device"
>> + depends on ARCH_SIRF
>> + select HWSPINLOCK
>> + help
>> + Say y here to support the SIRF Hardware Spinlock device, which
>> + provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processor
>
> s/processor/processors
>
>> + on the SoC.
>> +
>> + It's safe to say n here if you're not interested in SIRF hardware
>> + spinlock or just want a bare minimum kernel.
>> +
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> index 93eb64b..472b82d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile
>> @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock_core.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_OMAP) += omap_hwspinlock.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HSEM_U8500) += u8500_hsem.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_SIRF) += sirf_hwspinlock.o
>
> Please keep sort order here as well.
looks fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b68722a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sirf_hwspinlock.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
>> +/*
>> + * SIRF hardware spinlock driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited, a CSR plc group company.
>> + *
>> + * Licensed under GPLv2.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +
>> +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
>> +
>> +struct sirf_hwspinlock {
>> + void __iomem *io_base;
>> + struct hwspinlock_device bank;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Hardware spinlock register offsets */
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_RD_DEBUG 0x400
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_BASE 0x404
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(x) (HW_SPINLOCK_BASE + 0x4 * (x))
>> +
>> +/* Possible values of HW_SPINLOCK_REG */
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED 0
>> +#define HW_SPINLOCK_FREE 1
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>> +
>> + /* attempt to acquire the lock by reading its value */
>> + return (HW_SPINLOCK_FREE == readl(lock_addr));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
>> +
>> + /* release the lock by writing 0 to it */
>> + writel(HW_SPINLOCK_LOCKED, lock_addr);
>
> This looks really wierd, but I assume the naming of the value is in line
> with hardware documentation(?)
looks wired too. will double-check.
>
>
> Instead of having the somewhat confusing names you could replace the
> constants with just:
> return !!readl(lock_addr);
> and
> writel(0, lock_addr);
>
> If nothing else because you have the comments there as well...
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sirf_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + ndelay(50);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct hwspinlock_ops sirf_hwspinlock_ops = {
>> + .trylock = sirf_hwspinlock_trylock,
>> + .unlock = sirf_hwspinlock_unlock,
>> + .relax = sirf_hwspinlock_relax,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin;
>> + struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
>> + u32 num_of_locks;
>> + int idx, ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
>> + "num-spinlocks", &num_of_locks);
>
> As above; if you need this the property should have a "sirf," prefix.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Unable to find hwspinlock number. ret=%d\n", ret);
>
> No need to print the error code here.
>
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + hwspin = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hwspin) +
>> + sizeof(*hwlock) * num_of_locks, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!hwspin)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* retrieve io base */
>> + hwspin->io_base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> + if (!hwspin->io_base)
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> By using something like the following you can use devres for the ioremap.
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> hwspin->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> if (IS_ERR(hwspin->io_base))
> return PTR_ERR(hwspin->io_base);
the benefit should be avoiding kfree. this should be a coding style
issue. i think this of_iomap is following the existing omap driver.
>
>> +
>> + for (idx = 0; idx < num_of_locks; idx++) {
>> + hwlock = &hwspin->bank.lock[idx];
>> + hwlock->priv = hwspin->io_base + HW_SPINLOCK_OFFSET(idx);
>> + }
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hwspin);
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + ret = hwspin_lock_register(&hwspin->bank, &pdev->dev,
>> + &sirf_hwspinlock_ops, 0, num_of_locks);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto reg_failed;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +reg_failed:
>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sirf_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct sirf_hwspinlock *hwspin = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(&hwspin->bank);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> + return ret;
>
> Even if you return an error here the device will still be torn down.
>
so what is your suggestion about this? do you think the unregister
should be "void" as other unregister functions?
>> + }
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + iounmap(hwspin->io_base);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id sirf_hwpinlock_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "sirf,hwspinlock", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sirf_hwpinlock_ids);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver sirf_hwspinlock_driver = {
>> + .probe = sirf_hwspinlock_probe,
>> + .remove = sirf_hwspinlock_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "atlas7_hwspinlock",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sirf_hwpinlock_ids),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(sirf_hwspinlock_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SIRF Hardware spinlock driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Chen <wei.chen-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org>");
>
> Part of these details I think the patch looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-07 0:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-25 23:03 [PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: hwspinlock: add CSR atlas7 implementation Barry Song
2015-03-25 23:03 ` Barry Song
2015-05-06 18:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-05-07 0:25 ` Barry Song
2015-05-07 0:25 ` Barry Song
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.