Odd output from scrub status

Odd output from scrub status

[David C. Partridge]

root@charon:~/bin# btrfs scrub status /dev/sdb1
UUID:             f9655777-8c81-4d5e-8f14-c1906b7b27a3
Scrub started:    Sun Jul 17 10:27:39 2022
Status:           running
Duration:         1:59:29
Time left:        6095267:46:37
ETA:              Tue Nov 20 23:13:45 2717
Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB
Rate:             801.72MiB/s
Error summary:    no errors found
root@charon:~/bin#

Cheers, David

Re: Odd output from scrub status

[Nikolay Borisov]

On 17.07.22 г. 14:28 ч., David C. Partridge wrote:
> Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
> Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB


What kind of raid profiles are in use on this filesystem?

Re: Odd output from scrub status

[Qu Wenruo]

On 2022/7/17 19:28, David C. Partridge wrote:
> root@charon:~/bin# btrfs scrub status /dev/sdb1
> UUID:             f9655777-8c81-4d5e-8f14-c1906b7b27a3
> Scrub started:    Sun Jul 17 10:27:39 2022
> Status:           running
> Duration:         1:59:29
> Time left:        6095267:46:37
> ETA:              Tue Nov 20 23:13:45 2717
> Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
> Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB
> Rate:             801.72MiB/s
> Error summary:    no errors found
> root@charon:~/bin#
>
> Cheers, David
>
>
Mind to share the following commands output?

# btrfs fi df <mnt>
# btrfs fi usage <mnt>
# uname -a

I'm considering if it's RAID56 or other profiles causing the problem.

Thanks,
Qu

RE: Odd output from scrub status

[David C. Partridge]

Hardware Raid 5  It may have got confused because I did btrfs subvolume delete of a few subvolumes just before I started the scrub?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> 
Sent: 18 July 2022 09:02
To: David C. Partridge <david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk>; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd output from scrub status



On 17.07.22 г. 14:28 ч., David C. Partridge wrote:
> Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
> Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB


What kind of raid profiles are in use on this filesystem?

RE: Odd output from scrub status

[David C. Partridge]

> Mind to share the following commands output?

Sure, no problem

root@charon:/home/amonra# btrfs fi df /shared
Data, single: total=8.37TiB, used=5.76TiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=1.09MiB
Metadata, DUP: total=11.00GiB, used=5.56GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
root@charon:/home/amonra# btrfs fi usage /shared
Overall:
    Device size:		  25.46TiB
    Device allocated:		   8.39TiB
    Device unallocated:		  17.07TiB
    Device missing:		     0.00B
    Used:			   5.77TiB
    Free (estimated):		  19.68TiB	(min: 11.14TiB)
    Data ratio:			      1.00
    Metadata ratio:		      2.00
    Global reserve:		 512.00MiB	(used: 0.00B)

Data,single: Size:8.37TiB, Used:5.76TiB (68.89%)
   /dev/sdb1	   8.37TiB

Metadata,DUP: Size:11.00GiB, Used:5.56GiB (50.53%)
   /dev/sdb1	  22.00GiB

System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:1.09MiB (3.42%)
   /dev/sdb1	  64.00MiB

Unallocated:
   /dev/sdb1	  17.07TiB
root@charon:/home/amonra# uname -a
Linux charon 5.4.0-122-generic #138-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 22 15:00:31 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@charon:/home/amonra#

David

Re: Odd output from scrub status

[Chris Murphy]

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM David C. Partridge
<david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk> wrote:
>
> root@charon:~/bin# btrfs scrub status /dev/sdb1
> UUID:             f9655777-8c81-4d5e-8f14-c1906b7b27a3
> Scrub started:    Sun Jul 17 10:27:39 2022
> Status:           running
> Duration:         1:59:29
> Time left:        6095267:46:37
> ETA:              Tue Nov 20 23:13:45 2717
> Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
> Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB
> Rate:             801.72MiB/s
> Error summary:    no errors found
> root@charon:~/bin#


What version of btrfs-progs? Looks like 96ed8e801 fixed an issue with
ETA reporting, which I'm guessing made it into btrfs-progs 5.2 or
5.2.1?


-- 
Chris Murphy

RE: Odd output from scrub status

[David C. Partridge]

btrfs-progs 5.4.1-2

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> 
Sent: 18 July 2022 20:51
To: David C. Partridge <david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Odd output from scrub status

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 7:28 AM David C. Partridge
<david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk> wrote:
>
> root@charon:~/bin# btrfs scrub status /dev/sdb1
> UUID:             f9655777-8c81-4d5e-8f14-c1906b7b27a3
> Scrub started:    Sun Jul 17 10:27:39 2022
> Status:           running
> Duration:         1:59:29
> Time left:        6095267:46:37
> ETA:              Tue Nov 20 23:13:45 2717
> Total to scrub:   4.99TiB
> Bytes scrubbed:   5.48TiB
> Rate:             801.72MiB/s
> Error summary:    no errors found
> root@charon:~/bin#


What version of btrfs-progs? Looks like 96ed8e801 fixed an issue with
ETA reporting, which I'm guessing made it into btrfs-progs 5.2 or
5.2.1?


-- 
Chris Murphy

Re: Odd output from scrub status

[Chris Murphy]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:01 PM David C. Partridge
<david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk> wrote:
>
> btrfs-progs 5.4.1-2

Well, if you can find a newer version that'd help determine if it's a
current bug or one long since fixed. Current version is 5.18.1.



-- 
Chris Murphy

RE: Odd output from scrub status

[David C. Partridge]

Intermittent problem ...

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> 
Sent: 19 July 2022 04:35
To: David C. Partridge <david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>; Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Odd output from scrub status

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:01 PM David C. Partridge
<david.partridge@perdrix.co.uk> wrote:
>
> btrfs-progs 5.4.1-2

Well, if you can find a newer version that'd help determine if it's a
current bug or one long since fixed. Current version is 5.18.1.



-- 
Chris Murphy