Re: Data corruption when using multiple devices with NVMEoF TCP

[Hao Wang <pkuwangh@gmail.com>]

Also really strange to me. This has been burning me 16+ hours a day
for 2 days doing

And for your question, yes I did.
Locally on the target side, no data corruption happening, with the
same process of creating a partition on each device, creating a
2-device raid-0 volume, and creating a filesystem.
I have also tested on multiple sets of machines, but no luck.

Another point I should've mentioned is that corruption does not always
happen. Sometimes if I only copy one .gz file (~100MB), it seems fine.
But whenever I copy a large directory with many .gz files (~100GB in
total), there are always some .gz files corrupted.

Hao

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:29 AM Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> wrote:
>
> Hey Hao,
>
> > I'm using kernel 5.2.9 with following related configs enabled:
> > CONFIG_NVME_CORE=y
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NVME=y
> > CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH=y
> > CONFIG_NVME_FABRICS=m
> > # CONFIG_NVME_FC is not set
> > CONFIG_NVME_TCP=m
> > CONFIG_NVME_TARGET=m
> > CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_LOOP=m
> > # CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_FC is not set
> > CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP=m
> > CONFIG_RTC_NVMEM=y
> > CONFIG_NVMEM=y
> > CONFIG_NVMEM_SYSFS=y
> >
> > On target side, I exported 2 NVMe devices using tcp/ipv6:
> > [root@rtptest34337.prn2 ~/ext_nvme]# ll
> > /sys/kernel/config/nvmet/ports/1/subsystems/
> > total 0
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 19 02:08 nvmet-rtptest34337-1 ->
> > ../../../../nvmet/subsystems/nvmet-rtptest34337-1
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 19 02:08 nvmet-rtptest34337-2 ->
> > ../../../../nvmet/subsystems/nvmet-rtptest34337-2
> >
> > On initiator side, I could successfully connect the 2 nvme devices,
> > nvme1n1 & nvme2n1;
> > [root@rtptest34206.prn2 /]# nvme list
> > Node             SN                   Model
> > Namespace          Usage                      Format           FW Rev
> > ---------------- --------------------
> > ---------------------------------------- ---------
> > -------------------------- ---------------- --------
> > /dev/nvme0n1     ***********     INTEL *******          1
> > 256.06  GB / 256.06  GB    512   B +  0 B    PSF119D
> > /dev/nvme1n1     ***********     Linux                       1
> > 900.19  GB / 900.19  GB      4 KiB +  0 B     5.2.9-0_
> > /dev/nvme2n1     ***********     Linux                       1
> > 900.19  GB / 900.19  GB      4 KiB +  0 B     5.2.9-0_
> >
> > Then for each of nvme1n1 & nvme2n1, I created a partition using fdisk;
> > type is "linux raid autodetect";
> > Next I created a RAID-0 volume using, created a filesystem on it, and
> > mounted itL
> > # mdadm --create /dev/md5 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 --chunk=128
> > /dev/nvme1n1p1 /dev/nvme2n1p1
> > # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/md5
> > # mkdir /flash
> > # mount -o rw,noatime,discard /dev/md5 /flash/
> >
> > Now, when I copy a large directory into /flash/, a lot of files under
> > /flash/ are corrupted.
> > Specifically, that large directory has a lot of .gz files, and unzip
> > will fail on many of them;
> > also diff with original files does show they are different, although
> > the file size is exactly the same.
>
> Sounds strange to me. Nothing forbids mounting a fs on a raid0 volume.
>
> > Also I found that if I don't create a RAID-0 array, instead just make
> > a filesystem on either /dev/nvme1n1p1 or /dev/nvme2n1p1, there is no
> > data corruption.
> >
> > I'm wondering if there is a known issue, or I'm doing something not
> > really supported.
>
> Did you try to run the same test locally on the target side without
> having nvme-tcp/nvmet-tcp target in between?

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme