* state of systemd in oe
@ 2013-02-14 14:02 Ian Geiser
2013-02-14 15:39 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Geiser @ 2013-02-14 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Hey, I noticed that systemd service files are going back into the oe-core layer and not always compatible with meta-oe. What is the official policy on systemd right now? Is it supposed to be confined to the meta-oe/meta-systemd layer? Or what cases will they be pulled in and/or duplicated in oe-core? Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: state of systemd in oe
2013-02-14 14:02 state of systemd in oe Ian Geiser
@ 2013-02-14 15:39 ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-14 16:03 ` Trevor Woerner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2013-02-14 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Geiser; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 14 February 2013 14:02, Ian Geiser <igeiser@devonit.com> wrote:
> Hey, I noticed that systemd service files are going back into the oe-core layer and not always compatible with meta-oe. What is the official policy on systemd right now? Is it supposed to be confined to the meta-oe/meta-systemd layer? Or what cases will they be pulled in and/or duplicated in oe-core? Thanks!
I'm pulling as much as makes sense into oe-core, and the meta-systemd
maintainers are doing a sterling job at keeping up with changes we've
been making in oe-core, or deleting appends that have been merged into
oe-core.
Hopefully by the time 1.4 is released meta-systemd won't exist.
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: state of systemd in oe
2013-02-14 15:39 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2013-02-14 16:03 ` Trevor Woerner
2013-02-14 16:11 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Woerner @ 2013-02-14 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Just out of curiosity:
- will systemd be the default?
- will it be possible to still use/choose sysvinit (i.e. is sysvinit
going away)?
How does systemd fit in with busybox? My understanding is that busybox
has its own init system. If someone enables/chooses systemd, does it
disable busybox's init from being built?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: state of systemd in oe
2013-02-14 16:03 ` Trevor Woerner
@ 2013-02-14 16:11 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2013-02-14 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trevor Woerner; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 14 February 2013 16:03, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity:
> - will systemd be the default?
> - will it be possible to still use/choose sysvinit (i.e. is sysvinit
> going away)?
No and yes.
> How does systemd fit in with busybox? My understanding is that busybox
> has its own init system. If someone enables/chooses systemd, does it
> disable busybox's init from being built?
At the moment busybox's init isn't used - that's one of the many
options for an init system including sysvinit, which is the default.
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-14 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-14 14:02 state of systemd in oe Ian Geiser
2013-02-14 15:39 ` Burton, Ross
2013-02-14 16:03 ` Trevor Woerner
2013-02-14 16:11 ` Burton, Ross
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.