[PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[trix]

From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>

Remove the second 'know'.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
index bdc7a30d1217c..b92605df3872c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_ex_setup_region(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
 #ifdef ACPI_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
 	/*
 	 * If the Field access is any_acc, we can now compute the optimal
-	 * access (because we know know the length of the parent region)
+	 * access (because we know the length of the parent region)
 	 */
 	if (!(obj_desc->common.flags & AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID)) {
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-- 
2.26.3

Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>
> Remove the second 'know'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>

This is ACPICA material, so it needs to be submitted to the upstream
project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica/

Also, it would be good to combine all of the analogous changes in one patch.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> index bdc7a30d1217c..b92605df3872c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_ex_setup_region(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
>  #ifdef ACPI_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
>         /*
>          * If the Field access is any_acc, we can now compute the optimal
> -        * access (because we know know the length of the parent region)
> +        * access (because we know the length of the parent region)
>          */
>         if (!(obj_desc->common.flags & AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID)) {
>                 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> --
> 2.26.3
>

[Devel] Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM <trix(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tom Rix <trix(a)redhat.com>
>
> Remove the second 'know'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix(a)redhat.com>

This is ACPICA material, so it needs to be submitted to the upstream
project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica/

Also, it would be good to combine all of the analogous changes in one patch.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> index bdc7a30d1217c..b92605df3872c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_ex_setup_region(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
>  #ifdef ACPI_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
>         /*
>          * If the Field access is any_acc, we can now compute the optimal
> -        * access (because we know know the length of the parent region)
> +        * access (because we know the length of the parent region)
>          */
>         if (!(obj_desc->common.flags & AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID)) {
>                 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> --
> 2.26.3
>

Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[Tom Rix]

On 1/31/22 10:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>>
>> Remove the second 'know'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> This is ACPICA material, so it needs to be submitted to the upstream
> project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica/
>
> Also, it would be good to combine all of the analogous changes in one patch.

I am not sure if this is the last one for acpica, the finder script is 
very slow.

I will wait a bit and combine these in a day or two.

And take care of the other repo.

Tom

>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> index bdc7a30d1217c..b92605df3872c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_ex_setup_region(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
>>   #ifdef ACPI_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
>>          /*
>>           * If the Field access is any_acc, we can now compute the optimal
>> -        * access (because we know know the length of the parent region)
>> +        * access (because we know the length of the parent region)
>>           */
>>          if (!(obj_desc->common.flags & AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID)) {
>>                  if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> --
>> 2.26.3
>>

[PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

[trix]

From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>

Remove the second 'than'.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
index 69603ba52a3ac..f62d5d0242058 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info *acpi_hw_get_bit_register_info(u32 register_id)
  * RETURN:      Status
  *
  * DESCRIPTION: Write the PM1 A/B control registers. These registers are
- *              different than than the PM1 A/B status and enable registers
+ *              different than the PM1 A/B status and enable registers
  *              in that different values can be written to the A/B registers.
  *              Most notably, the SLP_TYP bits can be different, as per the
  *              values returned from the _Sx predefined methods.
-- 
2.26.3