Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM: runtime: enable wake irq after runtime_suspend hook called

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:" 
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
	Eddie Hung <eddie.hung@mediatek.com>,
	Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM: runtime: enable wake irq after runtime_suspend hook called
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:41:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gGntbfnvAP5A491_hUh-JUuqZjZRdPPLwWJjnZRtemcQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617874514-12282-1-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:35 AM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> When the dedicated wake irq is level trigger, enable it before
> calling runtime_suspend, will trigger an interrupt.
>
> e.g.
> for a low level trigger type, it's low level at running time (0),
> and becomes high level when enters suspend (runtime_suspend (1) is
> called), a wakeup signal at (2) make it become low level, wake irq
> will be triggered.
>
>                 ------------------
>                |           ^     ^|
> ----------------           |     | --------------
>  |<---(0)--->|<--(1)--|   (3)   (2)    (4)
>
> if we enable the wake irq before calling runtime_suspend during (0),
> an interrupt will arise, it causes resume immediately;

But that's necessary to avoid missing a wakeup interrupt, isn't it?

> enable wake irq after calling runtime_suspend, e.g. at (3) or (4),
> will works.
>
> This patch seems no side effect on edge trigger wake irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> index a46a7e30881b..796739a015a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -619,12 +619,12 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>         __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDING);
>
>         callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_suspend);
> -
> -       dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(dev, true);
>         retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
>         if (retval)
>                 goto fail;
>
> +       dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(dev, true);
> +
>   no_callback:
>         __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
>         pm_runtime_deactivate_timer(dev);
> @@ -659,7 +659,6 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>         return retval;
>
>   fail:
> -       dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev);
>         __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
>         dev->power.deferred_resume = false;
>         wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
> --
> 2.18.0
>