* [PATCH v5] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device()
@ 2023-09-14 21:31 Jinhui Guo
2023-09-18 10:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jinhui Guo @ 2023-09-14 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rafael, lenb, gregkh
Cc: lizefan.x, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, Jinhui Guo, stable,
kernel test robot
platform_add_device() creates the numa_node attribute of sysfs according
to whether dev_to_node(dev) is equal to NUMA_NO_NODE. So set the numa node
of device before creating numa_node attribute of sysfs.
Fixes: 4a60406d3592 ("driver core: platform: expose numa_node to users in sysfs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122309.mbxAnAIe-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
---
V4 -> V5: Add Cc: stable line and changes from the previous submited
patches
V3 -> V4: Refactor code to be an ACPI function call
V2 -> V3: Fix Signed-off name
V1 -> V2: Fix compile error without enabling CONFIG_ACPI
drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 4 +---
drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
index 48d15dd785f6..adcbfbdc343f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
@@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
if (IS_ERR(pdev))
dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(pdev));
- else {
- set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, acpi_get_node(adev->handle));
+ else
dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
dev_name(&pdev->dev));
- }
kfree(resources);
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 76bfcba25003..35c891075d95 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
goto err;
}
+ set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, ACPI_NODE_GET(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)));
ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
if (ret) {
err:
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index a73246c3c35e..6a349d53f19e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
return 0;
}
#endif
+
+#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) ((adev) && (adev)->handle ? \
+ acpi_get_node((adev)->handle) : NUMA_NO_NODE)
+
extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
#define PXM_INVAL (-1)
@@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
#define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev) do { } while (0)
#define ACPI_HANDLE(dev) (NULL)
#define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode) (NULL)
+#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) NUMA_NO_NODE
#include <acpi/acpi_numa.h>
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device()
2023-09-14 21:31 [PATCH v5] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device() Jinhui Guo
@ 2023-09-18 10:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-09-18 12:41 ` [PATCH] " Jinhui Guo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2023-09-18 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jinhui Guo
Cc: rafael, lenb, gregkh, lizefan.x, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
stable, kernel test robot
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jinhui Guo
<guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> platform_add_device()
According to "git grep" this function is not present in 6.6-rc2.
If you mean platform_device_add(), please update the patch subject and
changelog accordingly.
> creates the numa_node attribute of sysfs according
> to whether dev_to_node(dev) is equal to NUMA_NO_NODE. So set the numa node
> of device before creating numa_node attribute of sysfs.
It would be good to also say that this needs to be done in
platform_device_register_full(), because that's where the platform
device object is allocated.
However, what about adding the NUMA node information to pdevinfo? It
would be more straightforward to handle it then AFAICS.
> Fixes: 4a60406d3592 ("driver core: platform: expose numa_node to users in sysfs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122309.mbxAnAIe-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
> ---
> V4 -> V5: Add Cc: stable line and changes from the previous submited
> patches
> V3 -> V4: Refactor code to be an ACPI function call
> V2 -> V3: Fix Signed-off name
> V1 -> V2: Fix compile error without enabling CONFIG_ACPI
>
> drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 4 +---
> drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index 48d15dd785f6..adcbfbdc343f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
> if (IS_ERR(pdev))
> dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(pdev));
> - else {
> - set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, acpi_get_node(adev->handle));
> + else
> dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
> dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> - }
>
> kfree(resources);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 76bfcba25003..35c891075d95 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
> goto err;
> }
>
> + set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, ACPI_NODE_GET(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)));
> ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
> if (ret) {
> err:
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index a73246c3c35e..6a349d53f19e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) ((adev) && (adev)->handle ? \
> + acpi_get_node((adev)->handle) : NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +
> extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
>
> #define PXM_INVAL (-1)
> @@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
> #define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev) do { } while (0)
> #define ACPI_HANDLE(dev) (NULL)
> #define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode) (NULL)
> +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) NUMA_NO_NODE
>
> #include <acpi/acpi_numa.h>
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device()
2023-09-18 10:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2023-09-18 12:41 ` Jinhui Guo
2023-09-18 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jinhui Guo @ 2023-09-18 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rafael
Cc: gregkh, guojinhui.liam, lenb, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
lizefan.x, lkp, stable
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:30:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jinhui Guo
> <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
> > platform_add_device()
>
> According to "git grep" this function is not present in 6.6-rc2.
>
> If you mean platform_device_add(), please update the patch subject and
> changelog accordingly.
>
This is my mistake, the function name was written wrong.
I will fix it in the next patch.
> > creates the numa_node attribute of sysfs according
> > to whether dev_to_node(dev) is equal to NUMA_NO_NODE. So set the numa node
> > of device before creating numa_node attribute of sysfs.
>
> It would be good to also say that this needs to be done in
> platform_device_register_full(), because that's where the platform
> device object is allocated.
>
Thaks for your suggestion. I will modify my decription soon.
> However, what about adding the NUMA node information to pdevinfo? It
> would be more straightforward to handle it then AFAICS.
>
I have tried three potential solutions to fix the bug:
1. The first one is what the current patch do.
2. Add a new function interface only for acpi_create_platform_device() call.
But the code will be a bit redundant.
3. Add an member "numa_node" in `struct platform_device_info`, just as what
`struct device` done:
```
struct platform_device_info {
...;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
int numa_node;
#endif
```
But not all the call to platform_device_register_full() would set numa_node,
and many of them use ` memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));` to initialize
`struct platform_device_info`. It could initialize numa_node to zero and
result in wrong numa_node information in sysfs.
```
struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
const struct platform_device_info *pdevinfo) {
...;
/*
* (1) It will initialize numa_node in `struct device` to NUMA_NO_NODE.
* NUMA_NO_NODE is -1.
*/
pdev = platform_device_alloc(pdevinfo->name, pdevinfo->id);
...;
/*
* (2) If we add set_dev_node() here, we have to make sure pdevinfo->numa_node
* is correct. But It is difficult to do so, especially drivers don't want to
* set numa_node. Instead of initializing pdevinfo->numa_node to NUMA_NO_NODE,
* they are accustomed to memset `struct platform_device_info` to be zero.
*/
set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, pdevinfo->numa_node);
...;
/*
* (3) The sysfs attribute numa_node will create here.
*/
ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
...;
}
```
> > Fixes: 4a60406d3592 ("driver core: platform: expose numa_node to users in sysfs")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122309.mbxAnAIe-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> > V4 -> V5: Add Cc: stable line and changes from the previous submited
> > patches
> > V3 -> V4: Refactor code to be an ACPI function call
> > V2 -> V3: Fix Signed-off name
> > V1 -> V2: Fix compile error without enabling CONFIG_ACPI
> >
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 4 +---
> > drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > index 48d15dd785f6..adcbfbdc343f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > @@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > if (IS_ERR(pdev))
> > dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
> > PTR_ERR(pdev));
> > - else {
> > - set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, acpi_get_node(adev->handle));
> > + else
> > dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
> > dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> > - }
> >
> > kfree(resources);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > index 76bfcba25003..35c891075d95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, ACPI_NODE_GET(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)));
> > ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
> > if (ret) {
> > err:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index a73246c3c35e..6a349d53f19e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > #endif
> > +
> > +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) ((adev) && (adev)->handle ? \
> > + acpi_get_node((adev)->handle) : NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > +
> > extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
> >
> > #define PXM_INVAL (-1)
> > @@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
> > #define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev) do { } while (0)
> > #define ACPI_HANDLE(dev) (NULL)
> > #define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode) (NULL)
> > +#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) NUMA_NO_NODE
> >
> > #include <acpi/acpi_numa.h>
> >
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
Thanks,
Jinhui Guo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device()
2023-09-18 12:41 ` [PATCH] " Jinhui Guo
@ 2023-09-18 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2023-09-18 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jinhui Guo
Cc: rafael, gregkh, lenb, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, lizefan.x, lkp, stable
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:41 PM Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:30:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jinhui Guo
> > <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > platform_add_device()
> >
> > According to "git grep" this function is not present in 6.6-rc2.
> >
> > If you mean platform_device_add(), please update the patch subject and
> > changelog accordingly.
> >
>
> This is my mistake, the function name was written wrong.
> I will fix it in the next patch.
>
> > > creates the numa_node attribute of sysfs according
> > > to whether dev_to_node(dev) is equal to NUMA_NO_NODE. So set the numa node
> > > of device before creating numa_node attribute of sysfs.
> >
> > It would be good to also say that this needs to be done in
> > platform_device_register_full(), because that's where the platform
> > device object is allocated.
> >
>
> Thaks for your suggestion. I will modify my decription soon.
>
> > However, what about adding the NUMA node information to pdevinfo? It
> > would be more straightforward to handle it then AFAICS.
> >
>
> I have tried three potential solutions to fix the bug:
> 1. The first one is what the current patch do.
>
> 2. Add a new function interface only for acpi_create_platform_device() call.
> But the code will be a bit redundant.
>
> 3. Add an member "numa_node" in `struct platform_device_info`, just as what
> `struct device` done:
>
> ```
> struct platform_device_info {
> ...;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> int numa_node;
> #endif
> ```
>
> But not all the call to platform_device_register_full() would set numa_node,
> and many of them use ` memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));` to initialize
> `struct platform_device_info`. It could initialize numa_node to zero and
> result in wrong numa_node information in sysfs.
Well, platform_device_register_full() need not take that value as the
numa node number directly. It may, for example, take the number from
pdevinfo, subtract 1 from it and use the result of that as the numa
node number, if not negative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device()
@ 2023-09-14 21:28 Jinhui Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jinhui Guo @ 2023-09-14 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guojinhui.liam, guojinhui.liam, guojinhui.liam
Cc: Jinhui Guo, stable, kernel test robot
platform_add_device() creates the numa_node attribute of sysfs according
to whether dev_to_node(dev) is equal to NUMA_NO_NODE. So set the numa node
of device before creating numa_node attribute of sysfs.
Fixes: 4a60406d3592 ("driver core: platform: expose numa_node to users in sysfs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309122309.mbxAnAIe-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
---
V4 -> V5: Add Cc: stable line and changes from the previous submited
patches
V3 -> V4: Refactor code to be an ACPI function call
V2 -> V3: Fix Signed-off name
V1 -> V2: Fix compile error without enabling CONFIG_ACPI
drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 4 +---
drivers/base/platform.c | 1 +
include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
index 48d15dd785f6..adcbfbdc343f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
@@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
if (IS_ERR(pdev))
dev_err(&adev->dev, "platform device creation failed: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(pdev));
- else {
- set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, acpi_get_node(adev->handle));
+ else
dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "created platform device %s\n",
dev_name(&pdev->dev));
- }
kfree(resources);
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 76bfcba25003..35c891075d95 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
goto err;
}
+ set_dev_node(&pdev->dev, ACPI_NODE_GET(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)));
ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
if (ret) {
err:
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index a73246c3c35e..6a349d53f19e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
return 0;
}
#endif
+
+#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) ((adev) && (adev)->handle ? \
+ acpi_get_node((adev)->handle) : NUMA_NO_NODE)
+
extern int pnpacpi_disabled;
#define PXM_INVAL (-1)
@@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
#define ACPI_COMPANION_SET(dev, adev) do { } while (0)
#define ACPI_HANDLE(dev) (NULL)
#define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode) (NULL)
+#define ACPI_NODE_GET(adev) NUMA_NO_NODE
#include <acpi/acpi_numa.h>
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-18 15:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-14 21:31 [PATCH v5] driver core: platform: set numa_node before platform_add_device() Jinhui Guo
2023-09-18 10:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-09-18 12:41 ` [PATCH] " Jinhui Guo
2023-09-18 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-14 21:28 [PATCH v5] " Jinhui Guo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.