All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree
@ 2016-12-18 23:25 Stephen Rothwell
  2016-12-19  9:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2016-12-18 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

Hi Miklos,

Today's linux-next merge of the overlayfs tree got conflicts in:

  fs/overlayfs/dir.c
  fs/overlayfs/inode.c

I am pretty sure thses conflicts only exist because the overlayfs tree
was rebased before being merged by Linus.  I am dropping the oevrlay fs
tree for today.  Please clean it up.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree
  2016-12-18 23:25 linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2016-12-19  9:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2016-12-19  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the overlayfs tree got conflicts in:
>
>   fs/overlayfs/dir.c
>   fs/overlayfs/inode.c
>
> I am pretty sure thses conflicts only exist because the overlayfs tree
> was rebased before being merged by Linus.  I am dropping the oevrlay fs
> tree for today.  Please clean it up.

Hi Stephen,

Sorry, fixed now.

Thanks,
Miklos

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree
@ 2018-06-04  0:31 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2018-06-04  0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Miklos Szeredi
  Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Al Viro

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]

Hi Miklos,

Today's linux-next merge of the overlayfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/open.c

between commit:

  af04fadcaa93 ("Revert "fs: fold open_check_o_direct into do_dentry_open"")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  e0e3f7de6435 ("vfs: simplify dentry_open()")

from the overlayfs tree.

I have no idea how to fix this up ... so I just used the overlayfs
version for now.  I assume that this will need more work before being
merged into Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-04  0:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-18 23:25 linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-19  9:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-06-04  0:31 Stephen Rothwell

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.