* [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ufs: core: Let delay value after LPM can be modified by vendor
@ 2022-10-20 1:35 zhe wang
2022-10-20 7:16 ` Avri Altman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: zhe wang @ 2022-10-20 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jejb, martin.petersen, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, bvanassche
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, beanhuo, stanley.chu, adrian.hunter,
zhe.wang1, zhenxiong.lai, yuelin.tang
From: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
Some UFS devices require that the VCC should drop below 0.1V after
turning off, otherwise device may not resume successfully. And
because the power-off rate is different on different SOC platforms.
Therefore, we hope that the delay can be modified by vendor to
adjust the most appropriate delay value.
Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 +++++++++--
include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 7256e6c43ca6..f6350231da0e 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@
/* Polling time to wait for fDeviceInit */
#define FDEVICEINIT_COMPL_TIMEOUT 1500 /* millisecs */
+/* Default value of turn off VCC rail: 5000us */
+#define UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US 5000
+
#define ufshcd_toggle_vreg(_dev, _vreg, _on) \
({ \
int _ret; \
@@ -7784,6 +7787,9 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba);
+ if (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM && !hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
+ hba->vcc_turnoff_delay = UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US;
+
ufshcd_wb_probe(hba, desc_buf);
ufshcd_temp_notif_probe(hba, desc_buf);
@@ -8917,8 +8923,9 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
* Some UFS devices require delay after VCC power rail is turned-off.
*/
if (vcc_off && hba->vreg_info.vcc &&
- hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM)
- usleep_range(5000, 5100);
+ hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM &&
+ hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
+ usleep_range(hba->vcc_turnoff_delay, hba->vcc_turnoff_delay + 100);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 9f28349ebcff..bfde3cb962fb 100644
--- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -828,6 +828,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_monitor {
* device
* @complete_put: whether or not to call ufshcd_rpm_put() from inside
* ufshcd_resume_complete()
+ * @vcc_turnoff_delay: VCC turnoff delay value.
*/
struct ufs_hba {
void __iomem *mmio_base;
@@ -975,6 +976,7 @@ struct ufs_hba {
#endif
u32 luns_avail;
bool complete_put;
+ u32 vcc_turnoff_delay;
};
/* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ufs: core: Let delay value after LPM can be modified by vendor
2022-10-20 1:35 [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ufs: core: Let delay value after LPM can be modified by vendor zhe wang
@ 2022-10-20 7:16 ` Avri Altman
2022-10-20 9:16 ` Zhe Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avri Altman @ 2022-10-20 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhe wang, jejb, martin.petersen, alim.akhtar, bvanassche
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel, beanhuo, stanley.chu, adrian.hunter,
zhe.wang1, zhenxiong.lai, yuelin.tang
> From: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
>
> Some UFS devices require that the VCC should drop below 0.1V after
> turning off, otherwise device may not resume successfully. And
> because the power-off rate is different on different SOC platforms.
> Therefore, we hope that the delay can be modified by vendor to
> adjust the most appropriate delay value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 +++++++++--
> include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 7256e6c43ca6..f6350231da0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@
> /* Polling time to wait for fDeviceInit */
> #define FDEVICEINIT_COMPL_TIMEOUT 1500 /* millisecs */
>
> +/* Default value of turn off VCC rail: 5000us */
> +#define UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US 5000
> +
> #define ufshcd_toggle_vreg(_dev, _vreg, _on) \
> ({ \
> int _ret; \
> @@ -7784,6 +7787,9 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
>
> ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba);
>
> + if (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM &&
> !hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
> + hba->vcc_turnoff_delay = UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US;
Couldn't find where otherwise you are setting this value?
Also, UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM is only set for MTK.
Are you planning at some point adding your own host driver?
> +
> ufshcd_wb_probe(hba, desc_buf);
>
> ufshcd_temp_notif_probe(hba, desc_buf);
> @@ -8917,8 +8923,9 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> * Some UFS devices require delay after VCC power rail is turned-off.
> */
> if (vcc_off && hba->vreg_info.vcc &&
> - hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM)
> - usleep_range(5000, 5100);
> + hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM &&
> + hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
> + usleep_range(hba->vcc_turnoff_delay, hba->vcc_turnoff_delay +
> 100);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 9f28349ebcff..bfde3cb962fb 100644
> --- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -828,6 +828,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_monitor {
> * device
> * @complete_put: whether or not to call ufshcd_rpm_put() from inside
> * ufshcd_resume_complete()
> + * @vcc_turnoff_delay: VCC turnoff delay value.
> */
> struct ufs_hba {
> void __iomem *mmio_base;
> @@ -975,6 +976,7 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> #endif
> u32 luns_avail;
> bool complete_put;
> + u32 vcc_turnoff_delay;
Can this be part of struct ufs_vreg instead?
Also maybe vcc_turnoff_delay_us?
Thanks,
Avri
> };
>
> /* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
> --
> 2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ufs: core: Let delay value after LPM can be modified by vendor
2022-10-20 7:16 ` Avri Altman
@ 2022-10-20 9:16 ` Zhe Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhe Wang @ 2022-10-20 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avri Altman
Cc: jejb, martin.petersen, alim.akhtar, bvanassche, linux-scsi,
linux-kernel, beanhuo, stanley.chu, adrian.hunter, zhe.wang1,
zhenxiong.lai, yuelin.tang
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com> 于2022年10月20日周四 15:16写道：
>
> > From: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
> >
> > Some UFS devices require that the VCC should drop below 0.1V after
> > turning off, otherwise device may not resume successfully. And
> > because the power-off rate is different on different SOC platforms.
> > Therefore, we hope that the delay can be modified by vendor to
> > adjust the most appropriate delay value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhe Wang <zhe.wang1@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > index 7256e6c43ca6..f6350231da0e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@
> > /* Polling time to wait for fDeviceInit */
> > #define FDEVICEINIT_COMPL_TIMEOUT 1500 /* millisecs */
> >
> > +/* Default value of turn off VCC rail: 5000us */
> > +#define UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US 5000
> > +
> > #define ufshcd_toggle_vreg(_dev, _vreg, _on) \
> > ({ \
> > int _ret; \
> > @@ -7784,6 +7787,9 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba
> > *hba)
> >
> > ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba);
> >
> > + if (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM &&
> > !hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
> > + hba->vcc_turnoff_delay = UFS_VCC_TURNOFF_DELAY_US;
> Couldn't find where otherwise you are setting this value?
> Also, UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM is only set for MTK.
> Are you planning at some point adding your own host driver?
>
We are still preparing and discussing our own UFS host driver code,
which will be uploaded once we are done.
> > +
> > ufshcd_wb_probe(hba, desc_buf);
> >
> > ufshcd_temp_notif_probe(hba, desc_buf);
> > @@ -8917,8 +8923,9 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba
> > *hba)
> > * Some UFS devices require delay after VCC power rail is turned-off.
> > */
> > if (vcc_off && hba->vreg_info.vcc &&
> > - hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM)
> > - usleep_range(5000, 5100);
> > + hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_DELAY_AFTER_LPM &&
> > + hba->vcc_turnoff_delay)
> > + usleep_range(hba->vcc_turnoff_delay, hba->vcc_turnoff_delay +
> > 100);
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > index 9f28349ebcff..bfde3cb962fb 100644
> > --- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > +++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> > @@ -828,6 +828,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_monitor {
> > * device
> > * @complete_put: whether or not to call ufshcd_rpm_put() from inside
> > * ufshcd_resume_complete()
> > + * @vcc_turnoff_delay: VCC turnoff delay value.
> > */
> > struct ufs_hba {
> > void __iomem *mmio_base;
> > @@ -975,6 +976,7 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> > #endif
> > u32 luns_avail;
> > bool complete_put;
> > + u32 vcc_turnoff_delay;
> Can this be part of struct ufs_vreg instead?
> Also maybe vcc_turnoff_delay_us?
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
> > };
> >
> > /* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
Thanks for your suggestion, I will modify it in V2.
Thanks,
Zhe Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-20 9:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-20 1:35 [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ufs: core: Let delay value after LPM can be modified by vendor zhe wang
2022-10-20 7:16 ` Avri Altman
2022-10-20 9:16 ` Zhe Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.