From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf bench: Add support for 32-bit systems with 64-bit time_t
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:27:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0w4EOsSUThTAxrARPSyt+CGJTV4V4eeNmDNdG2Qrbq9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9db8c79a-f704-84ce-360b-84335f926a48@collabora.com>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:06 AM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
> Às 05:08 de 21/09/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:47 AM André Almeida
> > <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> #if defined(__i386__) || __TIMESIZE == 32
> >> # define NR_gettime64 __NR_clock_gettime64
> >> #else
> >> # define NR_gettime64 __NR_clock_gettime
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> struct timespec64 {
> >> long long tv_sec; /* seconds */
> >> long long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
> >> };
> >>
> >> int gettime64(clock_t clockid, struct timespec64 *tv)
> >> {
> >> return syscall(NR_gettime64, clockid, tv);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Then we can just use &timeout at __NR_futex_time64 for 32bit arch and at
> >> __NR_futex for 64bit arch.
> >
> > This is still broken when you disable CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME,
> > which disables all system calls that take time32 arguments.
> >
>
> Oh, I think my point was confusing then. My suggestion was to use only
> the futex entry points that accepts time64, and to always use
> clock_gettime that uses time64, for all platforms. Then it will work if
> we disable CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME.
Yes, that would be ok. It does require using at least linux-5.1, but we
perf is already sort-of tied to the kernel version.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf bench: Add support for 32-bit systems with 64-bit time_t
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:27:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0w4EOsSUThTAxrARPSyt+CGJTV4V4eeNmDNdG2Qrbq9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9db8c79a-f704-84ce-360b-84335f926a48@collabora.com>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:06 AM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
> Às 05:08 de 21/09/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:47 AM André Almeida
> > <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> #if defined(__i386__) || __TIMESIZE == 32
> >> # define NR_gettime64 __NR_clock_gettime64
> >> #else
> >> # define NR_gettime64 __NR_clock_gettime
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> struct timespec64 {
> >> long long tv_sec; /* seconds */
> >> long long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
> >> };
> >>
> >> int gettime64(clock_t clockid, struct timespec64 *tv)
> >> {
> >> return syscall(NR_gettime64, clockid, tv);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Then we can just use &timeout at __NR_futex_time64 for 32bit arch and at
> >> __NR_futex for 64bit arch.
> >
> > This is still broken when you disable CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME,
> > which disables all system calls that take time32 arguments.
> >
>
> Oh, I think my point was confusing then. My suggestion was to use only
> the futex entry points that accepts time64, and to always use
> clock_gettime that uses time64, for all platforms. Then it will work if
> we disable CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME.
Yes, that would be ok. It does require using at least linux-5.1, but we
perf is already sort-of tied to the kernel version.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-17 6:10 [PATCH v3 1/2] perf benchmark: Call the futex syscall from a function Alistair Francis
2021-09-17 6:10 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-17 6:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf bench: Add support for 32-bit systems with 64-bit time_t Alistair Francis
2021-09-17 6:10 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-17 7:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-17 7:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-17 18:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-09-17 18:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-09-20 22:47 ` André Almeida
2021-09-20 22:47 ` André Almeida
2021-09-21 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-21 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-21 23:06 ` André Almeida
2021-09-21 23:06 ` André Almeida
2021-09-22 11:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-22 11:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-22 11:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-09-22 11:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-24 4:34 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-24 4:34 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-24 4:34 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-24 4:34 ` Alistair Francis
2021-09-26 21:32 ` André Almeida
2021-09-26 21:32 ` André Almeida
2021-09-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf benchmark: Call the futex syscall from a function Davidlohr Bueso
2021-09-17 18:21 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a0w4EOsSUThTAxrARPSyt+CGJTV4V4eeNmDNdG2Qrbq9w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@collabora.com \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf bench: Add support for 32-bit systems with 64-bit time_t' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.